Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4 5 9
Quote# 103658

[This is from an article titled "What's Wrong With Liberals?"]

Today they dominate the government at every level, the Democrat Party, the courts, the schools, the universities, the news media, Hollywood, and every other aspect of the public sector you can think of - even quite a few of the churches. There are still a few religious leaders, political commentators, bloggers, and a handful of politicians who oppose them: but have you seen the opposition winning many battles lately? There are Newswithviews readers who now believe the Left is invincible in this fallen world, and will only be defeated with the return of Jesus Christ.

You'd think the progs would be happy, riding high as they are, abusing Christians to their hearts' content, running the show however they please. You'd think they wouldn't even notice the few small voices raised against them.

And yet they aren't happy. The most trivial act or word of dissent enrages them. They have conniptions over it.

Why?

Well, the Bible tells us Satan is unhappy - filled with wrath, because he knows he has only a short time left to run wild on the earth (Revelation 12:12). Sound like anyone you know?

When the devil is angry and unhappy, his servants are angry and unhappy.

With all the work they've done on Global Warming, for instance, nature refuses to cooperate and most people have noticed that. Libs 'n' progs love Global Warming! It's their ticket to global governance. "Deniers" must be crushed.

They push Evolution for all they're worth, and still a lot of people aren't buying it. Libs 'n' progs love Evolution: it gets God out of the picture, leaving the path clear for their own creation and idol, the devouring state, to be supreme. But somehow they just can't seem to nail it down.

It's the same story with all the rest of their comprehensive program of social engineering - same-sex pseudomarriage, all that "transgender" business, forcible redistribution of wealth, redefinition of the family, and the dissolution of all the nations into some icky kind of world government. They just can't close the deal.

[...]

As long as there is any opposition at all, leftists refuse to feel secure.

Lee Duigon, Barb Wire 15 Comments [9/23/2014 3:31:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103654

I really wish your guess was correct, but unfortunately it is not. I have come from a generational background with Illuminati ties through several family bloodlines.

Most of my family served in a different division, with out the deep involvement in the dark brotherhood. I know people who were part of that side and one of my own sons was a victim of Satanic ritualistic abuse.

Though I don't personally know Lauren Stratford, I have had help indirectly from her through a couple of her close friend's, Randolf and Johanna Michaelsen.

When I was trying to break free of the evil organization Someone gave me a copy of Johanna's book, "The Beautiful Side of Evil". I read the book..not with out difficulty. Especially toward the end of the book, my house came under demonic attack with simultaneous poundings and beatings all coming from the outer walls of the house. Even the windows were being beat upon to the point that I thought they would break. I struggled through the book and said the prayer provided at the end of the book. Instantly I felt the heavy black blanket of oppression lift off of me and leave! The poundings ceased, and I thanked God. I knew that God was there for me and He would keep me safe.

Wanting to thank Johanna for writing her book, I wrote her a letter. I never expected to hear from her, But I did. I don't remember if she wrote me first or called me first. She wanted to see how my family and I were doing. We kept in touch for a few years. I am very thankful for the time she and her husband took out of their busy schedule to counsel me and pray with me and for my family. Johanna was also very helpful during the time I was literally fighting to save my son's life who was being ritualistically abused. That was 22 years ago! To know my son today, you would never believe his past. He is truly a miracle! I am soooo thankful!!!! I thank God regularly for this miracle and for all those who have stood in the gap for my family and me. We make it a point to stay close to God. Psalm 91.

Carolyn Hamlett, christian-forum.net 14 Comments [9/23/2014 3:30:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Tony
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103651

One of the stock objections to the Resurrection is that Jesus didn’t appear to more people. But the problem with this objection is that infidels will always move the goalpost.

1. Suppose Jesus appeared to Pilate. Suppose we had an ostensible firsthand account of his appearance to Pilate.

How would infidels respond? Their first resort would be to deny the authenticity of the account. It must be a 2C forgery, or something like that.

And they know it couldn’t be authentic since dead men don’t return from the grave. So you have a circular denial.

2. But suppose the account was authenticated. How would infidels respond?

i) Their next resort would be to ask rhetorically, What’s more likely: that Jesus really did appear to Pilate, or that Pilate lied, or hallucinated, or we have a case of mistaken identity, &c.?

ii) They’d add that ancient witnesses can’t be trusted. They’re so superstitious, you know. So that feeds into their confirmation bias. They see what they expect to see. Things that go bump in the night.

3. Suppose Jesus appeared on national TV. How would the infidel respond?

He might says: What’s more likely: that dead men return from the grave, or that his television appearance was a computer-animated illusion?

4. Suppose Jesus made a personal appearance to the infidel? How would he respond?

i) He might say, How do I know it’s Jesus? What does Jesus look like, anyway? And it’s not like I can do a DNA match.

ii) Or he might say, What’s more likely: that dead men return from the grave, or that I had a hypnagogic hallucination?

iii) Or he might say, Even a space alien impersonating Jesus is more likely than Jesus appearing to me. At least space aliens, if they exist, are naturally possible. And any naturalistic explanation, however unlikely, is more likely than any supernaturalistic explanation like a miracle (i.e. the Resurrection).

steve, Triablogue 17 Comments [9/23/2014 3:27:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103650

There is no truth whatsoever in the second half of the above paragraph: "If you examine secular societies in comparison to religious societies; secular societies will consistently have less crime, unemployment, corruption and more freedom, share of wealth and a higher standard of living." The Refiner's Fire CHALLENGES the author to prove that statement!

Look at the U.S. in general, at what has happened since 1962 since "God" and prayer were removed from public schools and government buildings! Since then, things have become more secular, worse, and that is a proven fact! Do a Google search and you'll see the U.S. has the highest level of teenage drug abuse in any industrialized nation as well as the highest divorce rate. We are the world's largest manufacturer of beer and the third greatest consumer of alcohol per capita. The U.S. has some of the world's most liberal abortion laws, despite the many "pro-life" protests. Furthermore, organized, public prayer in our schools is against the law, but yet our children's textbooks honor Buddha and Mohammed! Magazines that would make the proverbial sailor blush appear on our grocery check-out lines for our children to see! Many American states have annual "gay" parades, and "gays" are now fighting for the right to marry - and our own President supports their cause!

"One nation under God"? Perhaps at one time, but not anymore.

Carmen, The Refiner's Fire 24 Comments [9/23/2014 3:27:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103649

Without God, a collection of subjective preferences based on the personal opinions and desires of the collective whole of society and the declared moral truth that unnecessary suffering is wrong, is the best that can be offered without God. But, ultimately, it fails because it is subjective, not universal. If you think it is universal because all people don't like unnecessary suffering, then think again. There are people who prefer unnecessary suffering. The mentally ill, for example. Are they wrong for preferring it? If you say it's okay for them, then the moral is not universal since it doesn't apply to them. If you say it's not okay for them, then you are imposing of value on others and what gives you the right to do that in a subjective world?


Matt Slick, CARM 18 Comments [9/23/2014 3:26:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103647

I forgot to mention that I personally believe Obama is not circumcised. His comfort in his own skin and obvious self-confidence, which is not manufactured or desperate, is what I imagine would likely be the case for an intact man. I could be wrong, but if I am found to be wrong I will be very surprised. As Hugh7 said in July, Obama’s father’s people, the Luo, don’t believe in circumcision even though they are Muslim (this is part of the conflict in Kenya), so it seems possible that he might have influenced Obama’s liberal -thinking mother not to let the doctor’s cut Obama. I hope so. And I hope we live to see the day when this incredibly traumatic, brutal, and damaging practice is made punishable by life sentences, hanging, or exile to a melting iceberg.

Robert, Last Blog on Earth 15 Comments [9/23/2014 3:25:54 AM]
Fundie Index: -1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103644

The rock duo, t.A.T.u. became famous for the video of their single, All The Things She Said, which features a memorable same-sex (neither woman is actually a lesbian) kiss in the rain. (left) Now one of the members has revealed she is actually a raging homophobe.

Citing an interview which has since been removed from YouTube, the pop-culture site Refinery 29 reports Yulia Volkova as saying she would never accept a gay son.

"Yes, I would condemn him, because I believe that a real man must be a real man. God created man for procreation, it is the nature. The man for me is the support, the strength male voice, male look. Definitely no, I won't support a gay son."

The stunned interviewer reacted, saying:

"Stop, stop. You just told me that you do not mind if your daughter was a lesbian. You were talking about freedom."

But Yulia doubled down:

"This only applies to a daughter, not a son. I think for men, it's a bad freedom. A man has no right to be a fag. Two girls together, not the same thing as the two men together. It seems to me that lesbians look aesthetically much nicer than two men holding their hands or kissing."

The amazing part of the interview is that Yulia insists she isn't homophobic. She explains it's just that she wants her son "to be a real man, not a fag." She finished by saying:

"Being gay is still better than murderers, thieves, or drug addicts. If you choose out of all this, being gay is better than the rest."

Yulia Volkova, New Civil Rights Movement 17 Comments [9/23/2014 3:24:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103642

Some basic facts on heterosexuality:
Heterosexuality is compulsory, that is we are psychologically conditioned (through propaganda) and physically forced into it (through sexual harassment, rape, marriage and pimping). This is one of the very basic tenets of radical feminism. Compulsory means the opposite of choice. By definition women never choose to be owned by a man, and the only free choice we can make is to resist hetero-captivity by becoming separatist, lesbian or celibate.

Heterosexuality is the system which guarantees each man sexual access to a woman and exclusive ownership over her so he can rape, impregnate and use her as his personal breeder and domestic slave. It’s the foundational institution of patriarchal oppression, on which all patriarchal institutions – economic, state, medical, religious, military, etc – are built on.

witchwind, radical wind 16 Comments [9/23/2014 3:23:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: What?
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103639

I was mainly speaking of male homosexuality. It is disturbing not only because it was forbidden, but also because it's just disturbing. I mean really? Really? It's actually natural for women to be somewhat attracted to each other, but men? Really? I literally thought it was a joke when I was first told about it...then come to find out that it's real...wow. If you don't think it's disturbing, then there's something wrong, either that or society is more influencial than I thought it was.

I'm only against male homosexuality, the Scriptures say nothing about women though it's strongly suggested that women marry (it's mostly against pure lesbianism in that case, then again the Scriptures never actually say anyone needs to get married).

It's the penetrating member that's the problem, a woman has no way of actually having Scriptural intercourse with another woman, so therefore they're free in that respect. My question is why can't this opinion be respected?

Shinobi Train, Naruto Base 52 Comments [9/22/2014 3:19:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 26
Submitted By: Menomaru
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103636

In an interview with Cleveland Right to Life’s Molly Smith earlier this month, Mission America President Linda Harvey claimed that LGBT youth centers are in fact “homosexual sex centers” where “kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals” and contracting HIV.

Harvey reported that LGBT teens at these centers “go and socialize with out homosexuals who are college-age and some of the volunteers who are out homosexuals” which leads her to believe that “kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals.”

“The things that go on in the bathrooms at these centers…It’s unbelievable. It’s everything you can imagine” she said.

“Social service agencies donate money because, again, it’s considered a youth center. No, it’s a homosexual sex center and kids should not be involved in this. This is another way HIV is being spread, I think. There’s no question that kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals, and that’s why you see Centers for Disease Control shows 13- to 24-year-old HIV rates are going up.”

Linda Harvey, Right Wing Watch 36 Comments [9/22/2014 3:10:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Zagen30
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103635

If you are considering voting for the Libertarian candidate in any Senate election, please send me your name and address so I can track you down and drown you.

Ann Coulter, Townhall.com 47 Comments [9/22/2014 3:09:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103634

To explain how evolution is impossible, let's take for example an XBOX 360. Let's give it a female counterpart for good luck. If you put them in a house full of food and fresh water, and then give them millions of years, do you think they will ever give birth to a Play Station 3?

No, of course not. The same impossibility applies to any animal today. If you take two dogs, and let them breed for millions of years, are they ever going to produce a non-dog? Like a bird, or a chimpanzee? No, of course not. They will always give birth to a dog.

Here's another example:

Now, my wife is black, and I am white. And the odds of her giving birth to a child... that has wings... is slim to none. Now, in evolution the change has to be beneficial to the species. And flying would be a great benefit. But that's impossible... UNLESS... WE TRY OVER AND OVER AGAIN FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS!

Yes, that's it! The magic formula for evolution is MILLIONS OF YEARS!

We can clearly see from these two examples that evolution is impossible. There is absolutely no logical proof for evolution.

Brian Price, Value of Truth 51 Comments [9/22/2014 3:09:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103631

[Pat Robertson loses his shit when the Air Force no longer requires recruits say "So help me God" when swearing oath]

TV preacher Pat Robertson lashed out at a “Jewish radical” on Thursday who he said was responsible for God being removed from the Air Force oath.

The Air Force announced on Thursday that the words “so help me God” were an optional part of the oath after an atheist airman crossed out the words on his reenlistment paperwork. Military officials had initially refused to accept the paperwork, but Department of Defense General Counsel eventually ruled that the words could be omitted.

Although the American Humanist Association had represented the airman, Robertson on Thursday blamed Military Religious Freedom Foundation President Mikey Weinstein for the movement against religion in the armed services.

“There’s a left-wing radical named Mikey Weinstein who has got a group about people against religion or whatever he calls it, and he has just terrorized the armed forces,” Robertson opined. “You think you’re supposed to be tough, you’re supposed to defend us, and you got one little Jewish radical who is scaring the pants off of you.”

“You want these guys flying the airplanes to defend us when you got one little guy terrorizing them?” he asked. “That’s what it amounts to.”

Pat Robertson, Raw Story 32 Comments [9/22/2014 3:06:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103626

If God were not logical, and if the Bible really did have any inconsistencies, then what would be the basis for saying that inconsistency is wrong? The law of non-contradiction is epistemologically rooted in the self-consistent nature of God. There is no rational basis for it otherwise. Thus, to accuse something of being wrong on the basis of inconsistency is to assume the truth of the Christian worldview

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 30 Comments [9/22/2014 3:02:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Tony
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103625

Marilyn Monroe sold her soul to Satan, stripping naked and leading an entire nation into adultery. It was her sensual role in the 1954 filthy movie, THE SEVEN YEAR ITCH, that led her divorce to baseball player Joe DiMaggio. Godless movie producers used a big floor fan to blow Marilyn's dress up over her head, completely exposing her private area for all the lustful men to never forget and film from different angle's. Her husband Joe DiMaggio was very upset with her for giving to other men what belongs only to him, that is, her body. Monroe's disloyalty to her husband, vows and marriage is awful. On her wedding day, a wife vows to keep her self only for her husband for as long as she shall live (and vise versa). Americans are such liars!

Sinfully regarding her career more than her husband (same as Sandra Bullock), Monroe filed for divorce several months later over the incident and quit her marriage (NO HUSBAND WAS GOING TO TELL MARILYN WHAT TO DO!!!). So she left, abandoned and ruined his life. Poor Joe!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 28 Comments [9/22/2014 3:02:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103623

To look at the really big picture, I think it is funny to listen to an evolutionists ask a creationist, “How could all the dogs in the world come from just two dogs on Noah’s ark?” and then turn around and teach that all the dogs in the world came from a rock! Over billions of years of course! (Or quickly if you are from Harvard!) On page 31 of The Ancestor’s Tale, Dawkins says, “It is entirely probable that cattle, pigs horses, sheep, goats, chickens, geese, ducks, and camels followed a course which was just as fast and just as rich in unexpected side-effects.”

Keep in mind that the changes needed to turn a wolf, fox, or jackal into a dog are minor compared to turning a rock into a dog or even an amoeba into a dog. I’m even willing to let them have the huge head start of not dealing with the major problem of the origin of life issue and letting them start with a hamster (already a mammal, air-breathing, and land-dwelling) and see if they can turn it into a dog.

Kent Hovind, Dr. Kent Hovind's Blog 31 Comments [9/22/2014 3:01:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103622

Well it happened in Beslan, Russia. I will never forget that horrible day. I'm really torn about the idea of M4's being in the hands of school cops. Our gubmit never focuses on the source of these problems--Islam. So long as we keep importing muslims like they're some kind of fine cheese, we'll have this looming cloud always hanging over us. Since we're too stupid to stop it (or worse, complicit in perpetuating it) then this is our reality.

I have no idea why we haven't used nukes on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, to finally be done with this cult.

Florian9, Rapture Ready 20 Comments [9/22/2014 3:01:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: jesus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103620

soon they'll have satanism in schools..... oh wait... its been renamed as evolution

michaelmynameis, Christian Forums 26 Comments [9/21/2014 8:33:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Armoured
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103618

"Ray, if I may ask, what training/school/ qualifications do you possess that make you a valid authority on any subject matter relating to the process of evolution? I read your biography that is posted on multiple sites, and I could not identify any formal training in evolutionary biology. Just want to know why I should trust your word, over the word of someone like Richard Dawkins. I am just curious as to what your college degree is in, and what formal training you accomplished. Thanks." Joe Smith

I'm not an expert in evolutionary biology, and have never claimed to be. That's why I took a camera to the experts at UCLA and USC and asked them for evidence of Darwinian evolution. They couldn't give any. Not a peep. Watch them flounder:www.evolutionVsGod.com (over 1.7 million views).

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's blog 27 Comments [9/21/2014 8:31:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103610

["FTMs do not hate all women, they hate the ones (can be man or woman) who do not respect their identity. I'm sure lesbians dislike the fact that people say that they're an abomination and they're going to hell."]

Why do they always bring up lesbians? This irritates me to no end. We all know that FTM "transitioning" is being used to erase lesbian identity, specifically butch lesbians who are almost an endangered species, and then they have the gall to start lecturing lesbians. After "transitioning", FTMs get to step up in social standing by becoming "men", and they also get to dump the lez or dyke label once and for all.

[...]

Girls receive messages that they are inferior to males almost from infancy. Many teenage girls are terrified of being labeled lesbian or dyke. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that a strong element of internalized misogyny and lesbian phobia play a major role in FTMs desire to "transition."

Anonymous, The Dirt from Dirt 23 Comments [9/21/2014 8:24:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103609

[Just to be clear, when dirt says "females" she is referring to trans men.]

No female transitions who does not HATE women, NONE! Although you will hear quite the opposite from trans females everywhere. How they "love" women, they just dont want to BE women. How they will open doors, admire how women put make up on, how sexy women look in heels, protect them even! These are the messages they have internalized, messages that spell out M I S O G Y N Y. Messages that are at the very least keeping women from reaching that ever elusive HUMAN status and at worse, killing them/us in droves.

If you hate your female body, it feels ugly, gross, uncomfortable, alien, it isnt because you have a "man" trapped somewhere in there, it is because you have been systematically taught from before birth the female body outside of sexually pleasing men is ugly, gross, messy, smelly, too fat, too skinny, no tits, pimply, sweaty, fishy. That natural female functions like pissing, shitting, farting, burping arent "lady like." That bleeding once a month is gross, smells, is messy, clotty, and unnatural because the less evolved male body only knows how to destroy life, not create it. That women are emotional, over emotional, too emotional, excessively emotional, because males again due to their (sad) hormonal make up cannot achieve the heights, the universal range of emotions that women can.

We've all heard story after story right from the mouths of trans females themselves about how post "T", they are now "much calmer" and can now think "more logically" etc. Meaning now that those messy girl emotions have been shut down or contained by the manly emotionally sterile testosterone, life is so much better! Better not because of feeling better, because they feel less, better because they can other themselves away from their hate object, women!

Unless we were taught to hate ourselves as female, we wouldnt. And we are taught to hate ourselves as female, by being taught that woman is something to be detested. You cannot hate your femaleness UNLESS you hate female as a nature. You cannot be uncomfortable within your femaleness UNLESS you hate female as a nature. You cannot try to change your female nature, without hating female nature first.

dirt, The Dirt from Dirt 20 Comments [9/21/2014 8:23:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103607

Imagine, if you will, Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton (though not necessarily together – we don’t wanna be too fantastic here), John Kerry, Stuart Smalley, Joe Biden and Bill Maher all gathered ‘round the base of ol’ Mount Sinai as Moses brings down the following decree to man directly from the mind and hand of God:


“I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

You shall have no other gods before me.”

(Exodus 20:2-3)

Any thoughts as to how that one would go over?

Not well, I’m guessing.

Especially when we take the time to note the clear meaning and intention of the phrase “no other gods before me”, as recorded by God here in this First Commandment upon which all subsequent Commandments are founded.

When God commands that there be “no other gods before me”, He is not even remotely suggesting that it’s just fine and peachy to have or allow other gods in the land, so long as they are not ahead of Him in line or above Him in status. No, that’s not what the language here conveys at all.

Its plain, crystal clear meaning is that there are to be no other gods in His sight within the land of His obedient people.

No other gods are to be tolerated, much less openly worshiped.That’s that the God of Christianity has commanded on the subject.

(For those paying attention, this all ties in rather neatly with recent news out of Oklahoma regarding the desires of satanists to freely express their religion and publicly display monuments to their god ,which I covered earlier in Prancing Ponies, Bible Belt Satanists, and America’s Proud Rebellion.)



Scott Alan Buss, fire breathing christians 25 Comments [9/21/2014 8:22:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Tony
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103605

(from the board discussing the upcoming movie Ouija. About using an actual ouija board.)


Ms-DonnaBray
I have never been a religious person and was once a guitarist in a heavy metal band from the 80s. So you could say that playing music with dark tones could be considered satanically influenced even though at that time I didn't realize it. Music like (Ozzy, Motley Crue, Judas Priest, Black Sabbath) ect.
I have always tried to live as a good person as that is where my heart has always led me. But then I made the dreadful mistake later in life of using that damn board it has changed me forever, in knowledge I have searched out to try to fix this sin of engaging the spirit world.
In old pictures of me growing up I never seen spirit orbs but after using the board in 95 I have captured spirit orbs in so many pictures of my family, orbs mostly with my daughter.
Throughout all this I have learned a great deal of why there is an importance of reading the bible. God and Jesus are not here to make us slaves or control us but rather guide us thru a safe path of peril this world contains. To teach us the real meaning of the question WHY. (WHY = LOVE), love has many meanings, I think the Apostle Paul written them best in his letters to the many churches.

I want to point out that so many people today think God, Jesus and religion are the same but they are not. God never created religion and Jesus actually argued against the religious leaders while he walked the earth, Jesus didn't agree with the religious leaders teachings. It was those same religious leaders that were the ones that had Jesus put to death. Religion is man made, not God made. When man created religion the evil spiritual forces twist religion to make those who have no understanding of the bible and the world then hate God because of religion. Does the Devil exist? Yes very much so. Lucifer has many he commands to destroy us. Why does he do this? Lucifer is angry against God and wants to prove to God we are inferior, he wants to justify his actions in the things he did in heaven and the destruction of the human race. He tried to make himself a God above the REAL God, that was why he was cast out of heaven.
I'm not a preacher by any means but now rather a student of life. God definitely saved me from hell and he will do the same for all who search him. God is a God of love, he wants us all to have a good life but not a sinful one. I found this out from the perils I put myself and family in when opening spiritual doors that lead to death.
I hope that what I write here will open the eyes of ones why try to understand what I have written so to understand the world we live in and the spiritual world that is around us all the time. Both worlds exist together but one is the physical plain and the other is a spiritual dimension that is made if energy. We are bound by time, the spirit world isn’t.
God bless

deepfreezeband1985, IMDB 17 Comments [9/21/2014 8:21:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Bryan65
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103604

It is no accident that the current lawsuit against me in federal court is for “Crimes Against Humanity.” They are deliberately trying to associate my name with the spectre of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, for whose criminal prosecution the category of “Crimes Against Humanity” was created. That association carries with it special implications (e.g. “If you could go back in time would you assassinate Hitler before he came to power?”).

And both the lawsuit and the HRC publication repeat outrageous lies and misrepresentations that paint me as a monster intent on inciting “gay” genocide.

Clearly, even this bogus lawsuit hasn’t stopped me from advocating Biblical truth about homosexuality and the LGBT agenda, so what is left for them to do?

I believe they are now deliberately trying to incite murder against me and every other person on their enemies list. That might have sounded a bit paranoid in years past, but post-Corkins it is just cold hard fact that some “gay” activists are incited to murder by inflammatory leftist rhetoric. The HRC knows that, and yet their rhetoric in this Exporting Hate publication is MORE inflammatory than the SPLC’s rhetoric the drove Corkins over the edge!

Because I am a Bible-believing Christian I am not afraid of death. But neither am I volunteering for martyrdom. As of today I am for the first time going to start taking precautions against the possibility of being assassinated by agents of the LGBT movement. For one thing, I will no longer publicize my travel schedule in advance.

And I am demanding a retraction and public apology from both HRC and SPLC. To both of them I insist: STOP INCITING HATE BEFORE YOU GET PEOPLE KILLED!!!!!

Scott Lively, Scott Lively Ministries 26 Comments [9/21/2014 8:20:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103602

[Commenting on the "Why I Quit Going To Your Church" article]

There's only one masculine, righteous form of Christianity left in the world and that is Orthodox Christianity with its ultimate masculine expression being the Russian Orthodox Church. Every Western church is feminised, corrupted and betaised. I want nothing to do with the weak Protestant sects or the current Vatican II mafia. In fact just like marriage in the West, if any man is associated with a Western church, your masculinity has immediately been demoted. The churches are 'legitimisers' of the state and cultural norms. The real Western churches died sometime circa 1962ish. The new architecture is drab and ugly, drawing its inspiration from the ugly glass and steel designs of modern architecture. The interiors are as hallowed out as the culture and people it represents and the church leaders dispossess the moral authority that once consolidated the families of nations. The West is a whore, bereft of any real legitimacy, and whose principles are completely alien to anything masculine and right.

Lance Christopher, Return of Kings 21 Comments [9/21/2014 8:17:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 9