Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4 5 10
Quote# 102390

Lastly, I became a Christian primarily through the study of Bible prophecy. While studying engineering, statistics, etc., in college, I was confronted with and blown away by the prophecies contained within the Bible. Prophecies such as the destruction of Tyre (Ezek. 26:1-16), the regathering of Israel in our lifetime after thousands of years of dispersion (Is. 11:11-12; 66:7-8), Daniel’s prophecies about the rise and fall of Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, and specific leaders such as Alexander the Great and Antiochus Epiphanies (Dan. 7:1-8; Dan. 8, Dan. 11) are so specific and on the mark that the only way skeptics have tried to refute them is by saying they were written after the fact; however, good historical investigation proves their claims to be false. For more information on these prophecies and others, see Newman’s compilation of evidence from Bible prophecy.[9]

Moreover, the prophecies about the coming of Jesus are simply astonishing. Over 100 distinct prophecies about Christ hundreds of years before His birth were made, which all came true. Peter Stoner, in his book Science Speaks, calculates the odds of just eight prophecies being accidently fulfilled in the life of one man to be 1017 or one hundred quadrillion.[10] Mathematicians point out that anything which exceeds 1050 power is the exact same thing as zero chance, and this probability is exceeded with 20 fulfilled prophecies (and remember, Jesus fulfilled over 100).

Concerning Bible prophecy, Blaise Pascal wrote: "I see many contradictory religions, and consequently all false save one. Each wants to be believed on its own authority, and threatens unbelievers. I do not therefore believe them. Every one can say this; every one can call himself a prophet. But I see that Christian religion wherein prophecies are fulfilled; and that is what every one cannot do."[11] It seems to me we have some pretty extraordinary evidence to substantiate the supernatural nature of the Bible and the God behind that Bible.

I could continue, but you get the idea. I think Christianity has some pretty extraordinary evidence on its side.

But, let’s now stop for a moment and consider the skeptic and atheist worldview. Do they make claims that would seem to necessitate extraordinary evidence?

The atheist claims that a cause (with a beginning all its own) possessing none of the characteristics of its effects created all that we know via time + matter + chance. That’s a pretty extraordinary claim.

The atheist claims that “Living objects . . . look designed, they look overwhelmingly as though they’re designed. Biology is the study of complicated things which give the impression of having been designed for a purpose”[12] but are not designed, and that the information (not data) contained with all of us did not come from an intelligent source. That’s a pretty extraordinary claim.

The atheist claims that either Jesus never existed or all the historical accounts written about Him are inaccurate, exaggerated, and cannot be trusted. Given all the historical evidence refuting such a position, that’s a pretty extraordinary claim.

If extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, then the atheist has some explaining to do. And that explaining needs to involve supplying the same extraordinary evidence that they require of Christians.

Robin Schumacher, Blogos 37 Comments [7/30/2014 3:27:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102388

Slaves will be slaves, keep turning your RIGHT to protect yourself over to a criminal , corporate , police state that cares NOTHING ABOUT YOU! They care only of your inability to defend yourselves in the event of ANY emergency , whether man made or nature made. If you ignore history, and this isn't ancient history were talking about, and give into the B.S. That your being spoon fed YOU DESERVE TO BE IN A FEMA CAMP

Robbie Rage, The Libertarian Republic 25 Comments [7/30/2014 3:08:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Firestarox
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102382

Sure they are! We are at a point where it is Good vs Evil and your side has nothing to do with good!
Leftist:
* kill babies
* no borders
* destroy capitalism
* lie,cheat,steal
* force others to be open to phag lifestyle
* avoid any personal responsibility
* zero discipline in schools
* Live off the backs of hard workers while wasting their minds and bodies with drugs!
* participation trophies for last place so wittle feelings don't get hurt
* OWS movement, one messed up orgy of drug attics.
* believe global warming cause we say it is real
* indoctrinate our youth with failed liberalism as ideology
* Common Core Garbage
* the only time Liberal/Progressive aren't freaking out is if you agree with their twisted views! Fascists Scum that they are!

No quality, redeeming traits to speak of! YOUR TIME WILL COME!

Gr8tGooglyMoogly, Hollywood Reporter 31 Comments [7/30/2014 3:06:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: zipperback
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102380

In more haredi war news, the Maayanei Hayeshua Medical Center in the haredi city of Bnei Brak has been sharply criticized by Auerbach’s faction, as well, after some haredi yeshiva students began volunteering to help the medical staff. Auerbach's faction complained that this volunteering would cause the haredi yeshiva students to neglect their yeshiva studies, and therefore it should be stopped immediately.

Hospital officials reportedly responded that before asking the students to volunteer, they had asked rabbis who ruled that it was permissible because it is taking part in as saving lives, and is therefore a mitzvah.

Auerbach’s faction, however, disagrees.

Almost no haredim serve in the IDF and the minuscule number said to be serving in Gaza are a only a tiny percentage of what the number should be proportionate to the haredi population of Israel.

Haredi rabbinic leaders from all factions have ascribed Israel’s relative safety from thousands of Hamas rockets and missiles to various magic formulations based on God’s protection of the Land of Israel and the Jewish people, but have refused to acknowledge or thank the IDF, IDF soldiers, the Iron Dome missile defense system, the scientists who developed it and who help run it, or the US, which paid for it.

“Everything is really all from God,” one haredi rabbi recently said, going on to say that putting any trust in the Iron Dome or even praising it was a form of “idol worship.”

Followers of Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach, Failed Messiah 14 Comments [7/30/2014 3:05:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102378

Despicable spying by Gog and Magog continues as intensely as ever. When one nation spies on another, the other nation takes countermeasures, leading to an endless circle of espionage and counter-espionage.

Originally, MI5 and MI6 were housed in the same building, but they eventually became separate spying bureaus.

Domestic and international spying have separate headquarters in London, but they are all financed by the Bank of England, and answer to the queen!!

The CIA and FBI are their CLONES in the United States.

Only the Judgment Day will reveal the number of people who spied for . . . and are still spying for those 2 agencies.

The FBI (Federal Bureau of Inquisition) is a clone of MI5 and concentrates on domestic spying!!

The CIA (Central"Intelligence" Agency) is a clone of MI6 and concentrates on foreign spying.

Only the Judgment Day will reveal the number of people who spied for . . . and are still spying for these 2 agencies.

When will all this despicable spying end? Only when the master spy Satan himself and his dupes are cast into the lake of fire and brimstone will the universe be rid of Satan and his spies forever:

And the beast was taken and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. (Revelation 19:20).

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 19 Comments [7/30/2014 3:05:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102376

The Coming Christian Revolt

By Matt Barber, July 21, 2014

From behind a smoking sniper rifle high atop his ivory tower peers the secular “progressive.” He surveys his many victims, strewn across the American landscape below and mockingly sneers, “War on Christianity? What war on Christianity?”

He then resumes shooting, all the while insisting that those uncooperative Christians who scatter for cover behind the Word of God and the U.S. Constitution somehow suffer from a “persecution complex” (the baker, the photographer, the florist, the innkeeper, the Christian school administrator, etc.).

Though there are many, it is plain for all to see that abortion and “sexual liberation” remain the two principal theaters in the ongoing culture war battlefront.

To fully advance the causes of radical feminism, abortion-on-demand, unfettered sexual license, gay marriage and the like, the pagan left must do away with religious free exercise altogether. Under the guise of “anti-discrimination,” Christians today face discrimination at unprecedented levels.

Let’s see if we can make this abundantly clear. Christians, true Christians—regenerate, Bible-believing Christians who strive their level best to maintain fidelity to the word of God and honor His commands—will not—indeed cannot—participate in, approve of, facilitate or encourage certain behaviors deemed by the Holy Scriptures to be immoral or sinful.

This is both our constitutionally affirmed human right and our Christian duty.

It is not done from hate. It is not done from bigotry. It is done neither from a position of superiority nor a desire to “impose our beliefs” upon others.

It is done from both obedience to Christ and compassion for our fellow fallen who yet wallow in folly.

Central to Christianity, and clearly delineated throughout both the Old and New Testaments, is the unambiguous and timeless proposition that any sexual practice outside the bonds of true man-woman marriage constitutes sexual immorality and results in separation from God. This, of course, includes sexual acting out between members of the same sex, whether or not such acting out is tied to the novel notion of so-called same-sex marriage.

Likewise central to Christianity is the relatively easy-to-understand concept that a Christ follower must neither take the life of a pre-born child nor aid and abet, in any way, the taking of such life.

It is not so much that Christians wish, willy-nilly, to call abortion, homosexual behavior, fornication, adultery, bestiality, incest or any other disordered sexual proclivity “sinful.” It is, rather, that we must. For the true Christian, God’s objective truths will always trump man’s subjective desires.

Newton’s Third Law states: “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”

For every law, regulation, activist court ruling or presidential edict that demands Christians violate their sincerely held religious beliefs and adopt a postmodern, moral relativist way of life, there increases, in exact proportion, the likelihood of widespread civil disobedience—disobedience of the sort we haven’t seen since the civil rights struggles of the 1950s and ’60s.

Indeed, if, in the spirit of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., we, his fellow Christian travelers, must again face the water hoses, then face them we shall.

As the recent Hobby Lobby decision reaffirmed, the government cannot legislate away religious free exercise. Where your desire, intense though it may be, for me to employ you despite your antagonistic values system, pay for your abortion, or host, photograph or otherwise bake a rainbow cake for your faux wedding, comes into conflict with my absolute right to religious liberty, the result is a forgone conclusion.

I win, you lose.

We have seen and will continue to see an exponential increase in Christian business owners refusing to violate God’s commands by complying with unconstitutional, immoral and unjust government dictates.

For 2,000 years, whenever such conflicts have arisen, Christians have placed the laws of God above the laws of man.

What makes you think we’re about to change now?

As many in the early church refused to bow a knee to Caesar in worship, so, too, will many modern Christians refuse, under any circumstances, to obey any law that presumes to make sin obligatory.

If the ancient church, through the power of the Holy Spirit, was able to face the lions in hopeful anticipation of joining Jesus, then we, too, under the same Spirit, will face anything today’s pagan left can threaten.

In the ongoing culture war, it seems there are no rules of engagement. The secular left will accept nothing short of unconditional surrender. That is to say, the pagans demand that we Christians abandon the biblical worldview altogether, and adopt their own.

This will never happen.

Martin Luther King Jr. famously declared, “One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

In 2012, after the Obama administration unilaterally issued its now-gutted HHS contraception/abortion mandate, Catholic priests from across the nation, to their great credit, read from the pulpit a letter that contained the following declaration: “We cannot—we will not—comply with this unjust law.”

As our secularist government increasingly imposes similar laws, so, too, increases the certitude of civil disobedience.

While there are those who will give way out of fear, weakness or a desire to conform to the world, there are many others who will not. Christians must peacefully come together, lock arms and redouble our resistance to evil.

Even when that evil is adorned with the presidential seal and signature

AFTH, Americans For Truth 37 Comments [7/29/2014 1:58:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Dominic
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102375

[Supposed Twitter conversation between a self declared neo-reactionary(Scharlach) and an anarchist recounted for his audience, had to cut well over half due to ramble so more under the link]

Anarchist: Cultural groups are not as different as you’re implying here. I’ve traversed enough of this planet to know that human cultures are very similar . . . the differences are relatively small.

Scharlach: The differences are small? That’s interesting. I heard just the other day that Afghanistan might go back to stoning adulterers.

Anarchist: What? Huh? I don’t get it? Huh?

Scharlach: Nevermind. I’d just say that your globe-trotting has most likely been from cosmopolitan city to cosmopolitan city. Everyone looks the same in those cities because they’ve all just adopted your Western norms and ways of living. These people are a minority.

Anarchist: Well, then, the key for democracy is to . . . . to . . .

Scharlach: To what? To make sure that no one on the globe really is all that different from anyone else?

Anarchist: You’re putting words in my mouth!

Scharlach: You just said a moment ago that you define democracy as a system of governance in which individuals group together to decide on things that impact them directly. So let’s look at the Afghan example: do you think it’s alright for Afghans to stone adulterers?

Anarchist: Of course not! That’s horrid! It’s especially horrid because it’s almost always the women who get punished, not the men! Misogyny!

Scharlach: Maybe. But I personally think Afghans have every right to stone adulterers if that’s their cultural consensus. Just as Americans have every right to jail anyone who stones anyone else, if that’s the American consensus.

Anarchist: So you have no problem with murder, slavery, genocide, so long as they’re “culturally consensual”?

Scharlach: I think that any attempt I might make—as an outsider—to solve a problem in Africa or the Middle East would only make matters worse. And you should agree with me, too, if you believe your own version of democracy just defined a moment ago. You need to ask yourself, if you’re such an anarchist, such a believer in organic decision-making among people involved in something, why do you feel this impulse to interfere with something happening in an alien culture five thousand miles away from you? Do adultery laws in Afghanistan “impact you directly”? Does slavery in Africa “impact you directly”?

Anarchist: First, even if it didn’t, we still need to take moral stances on some things. And, second, yes, it does: slavery in Africa makes electronics cheaper for me.

Scharlach: This is exactly what I was talking about at the beginning: in a democracy, it’s only a matter of time before everyone comes to believe that everything affects them directly . . .

Anarchist: [Silence]

Scharlach: And in the end, maybe everything does, in some Cloud Atlas kind of way, affect everyone at some level. Which is why the universalist democratic impulse is dangerous. When everyone has a voice about everything everyone else does, the world becomes its own tyranny.

Scharlach, Habitable Worlds 20 Comments [7/29/2014 1:57:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102367

[This is from the second day of Brother Nathanael's "street evangelism report" in Times Square of New York City.]

ALL was going really well with many conversations and even some very serious ones sharing Christ with a group of young adults in their early 20's.

Satan was NOT happy and he sent behind me on the smaller median strip a "naked cowgirl" who was way past her prime.

She looked like she was in her late 60s and a Jew. Half of her buttocks crack was showing, she was totally wrinkled from head to toe with hideous varicose veins and her breasts were totally exposed except for some pasted hearts on her nipples.

It was all one HIDEOUS spectacle.

Now the masses, (the goyisha masses) were totally focused on this miserable naked witch Jew. (Has to be a metaphor for the Jew-control of Jewmerica.)

After exercising much patience for 30 minute I decided I had enough of this witch.

So I turned around and told the professional camera man, who was photographing me for his particular project, that I am now going to get "rid of this witch."

"How are you going to do that?" He asked. "Watch me," I answered.

So I yelled out to the Jew witch, (who was giving me the finger the whole time), "Hey! Look at me!" She did.

Then I took my Cross and made a slicing motion under her knees and said, "You're finished!"

She yelled back, "You're doing that because I'm Jewish."

I replied, "You're lewd, you old hag."

She began to wither and 5 minutes later she walked off into the crowd never to return.

Brother Nathanael Kapner, Real Jew News 25 Comments [7/29/2014 1:50:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102364

Because Atheists think they are better than everyone else. Atheists are extremly racist. They think black people are closer to monkies than everyone else! That's what evolution teaches! Atheism is inherently nihilistic. Atheism leads to Communism. Atheism = Big Government = Nihilism = Racism = Christianphobia = Homosexual Agenda = Abortion Holocaust = Satanism = Socialism = Liberalism = Paganism = Lesbianism = Communism = Illuminati = ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
Atheists have been in control of America since the sixties. That's why America has become a cesspool of sin! That's why most television shows are pornographic. That's why gays are getting naked and demanding access to our children.
Jesus says "Atheists are children of the devil". Atheists serve Satan (knowingly or unknowingly). Atheism attracts perverts, homosexuals, druggies, drunks, feminists, pagans, Liberals, communists, emo kids, goths, lesbians, and pedophiles because it allows them to live perverted lifestyles. Atheism is a sick and violent (look at Stalin and Pol Pot!) religion that the world would be better off of if it was exterminated.


Kaykay, Yahoo! Answers 31 Comments [7/29/2014 1:49:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Juicifur
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102363

(referring to the MH17 crash)

Thank God that this righteous work of God has grabbed the attention of the world. It is time to speak some truth! It is the time to declare plainly and unapologetically: The Judge of All the Earth Shall Do Right! As Abraham declared in Genesis Chapter 18 on the eve of the holocaust that killed millions at Sodom in a few minutes, kind of like this event.

The evidence is compelling that these 298 souls are in hell.

There is no objectively reasonable basis to believe anything else about the eternal fate of these 298. You all have the responsibility to judge between good and evil [Amos 5:15; Luke 12:57] and take forth the precious from the vile [Jeremiah 15:19]: especially at the time of death and eternity.

Make no mistake and nix the lying, maudlin talk: the wicked shall be turned into hell and all nations that forget God. [Psalm 9:17]. These are not giant land masses entering hell, these are persons—one by one—like the rich man of Luke Chapter 16. Read it.

These nine countries, especially those prominently represented amongst these dead–Dutch, Malaysians and Australians– stand tall in the world of rebellious perverts. Go to any search engine and look it up and find that these nations are dominated by false and idolatrous religious practices and policies, and their followers are hell-bound. The first place to visit for complete and accurate information is www.godhatesatheworld.com for your research. And, as a direct result of their idolatry the Lord turns them over to fornication, adultery and faggotry. Read Romans Chapter 1 for that lesson.

Westboro Baptist Church, WBC blogs 26 Comments [7/29/2014 1:49:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102359

Conservapedia proven right, again: the nation that rejects same-sex marriage and stands up against the homosexual agenda wins the World Cup. Germany did not lose a game the entire tournament, even though its opponents often had more talented players.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 43 Comments [7/29/2014 3:29:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Night Jaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102358

[In Conservapedia's article on 'Scientist']

A scientist is someone who practices science. Scientists who have tenure at universities, however, are often liberal atheists, as faculties today are hostile to people like Isaac Newton or Louis Pasteur who were inspired by their faith.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 39 Comments [7/29/2014 3:29:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Night Jaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102357

You Might be a Statist

You think that others can morally make decisions about the appropriate use of the private property of another person.

You hate greedy corporations, but think an organization such as the government - itself a greedy organization- will protect you from greedy corporations.

You think it is possible for government to change the laws of supply and demand or determine an appropriate response to scarcity.

You think your neighbor, or some guy on the other side of town, should be restricted from owning a firearm, since he might be a psychopath, while simultaneously assuming that some other guy, who might be a psychopath, can be armed because a third guy or group of people - none of whom you have ever met - authorizes it.

You think the moral nature of theft, murder, slavery, assault, and kidnapping change dependent upon the size of the group that authorizes these actions.

You are scared of the idea of consenting adults engaging in free trade; especially if they are not taxed or regulated.

You think it is morally justified to withhold trade with the people of a country - called an embargo or imposing sanctions - in order to blackmail the ostensible ruler(s) of that country to do your bidding.

You assert that guns cause crime, food causes obesity, schools cause education, or states create wealth.

You are not aware that most regulations are in place to protect existing companies from competition.

You claim separation of church and state, then vote for government to enforce your beliefs and values.

You think charity only happens when the government gives money to poor people.

You think that rules written by bureaucrats of the state can be used to control the state.

You think it's okay to give up some rights for security.

You believe that health care, education, housing, and food are rights.

anonymous, secrets of the fed 39 Comments [7/29/2014 3:29:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: skybison
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102356

Over 1 billion Chinese are ready to adopt the Christian Faith of Sun Yat-Sen!!

Over 1 billion Chinese people are tired of British Communism and they are ready to adopt the Faith of Sun Yat-sen which is catholic and universal Christianity.

Millions visit the mausoleum, but few realize that he too was cut down by a British assassin at the very moment of his greatest triumph!!

A Lincoln-like statue of Dr. Sun Yat-sen dominates the interior of the mausoleum.

2011 was the centenary of the Republic of China so a banner of Dr. Sun Yat-sen was installed in Red Square.

A giant portrait of the Chinese Abraham Lincoln dominates Red Square.

This portrait indicates that the Chinese are ready for a Tea Party to dump British Communism into the sea.

in 1838, Commissioner Lin Zexu dumped thousands of tons of British opium into the sea.

Communism is worse than opium because opium kills the body but Communism kills the soul.

Unfortunately, there is a wax dummy of British spy Mao Zedong close to the portrait of the Chinese Abraham Lincoln. The life-like dummy was probably made at Madame Tussaud's in London. Communists and atheists always prefer cremation because they think the Almighty won't be able to put their bodies back together again for Judgment Day!!

In one of the cruelest hoaxes in history, millions of Chinese have walked past the portrait of Sun Yat-sen on their way to honor a wax dummy of British spy Mao Zedong!!

Mao said that he wanted to be cremated after death. Communists and atheists always prefer cremation because they think the Almighty won't be able to put their bodies back together again for Judgment Day!!

When Chiang died in Taiwan in 1975, his tomb was temporary, because he desired to be buried in his native Fenghua, in Zhejiang province.

His beloved wife Madame Chiang sleeps in Westchester County, New York.

British spy Karl Marx said that "religion is the opiate of the people." As a matter of fact, Communism is the opiate of the people. Chinese people are much too intelligent to be Communists . . . or Fascists.

The time for China to reunite under the banner of true Christianity is NOW. The typical British Empire strategy is divide and conquer. We see that in India, Africa, South America, Ireland etc., etc. The true Son of Heaven said:

And Joshua knew their thoughts, and said unto them, "every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand (Matthew 12:25).

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 35 Comments [7/29/2014 3:28:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102354

If Dinosaurs lived millions of years ago and before man ever entered the picture (according to Darwin) then why do we have drawings of them by man before man discovered dinosaur fossils?

SolaSaint, BaptistBoard 24 Comments [7/29/2014 3:26:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: PT
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102349

Do Not Work In A Job That Employs Women

Division of labor according to sex has been a feature of human societies since the beginning. There are even theories by some anthropologists that this division was what allowed Homo Sapiens to decisively pull ahead of their competitors. World War II and the ensuing scourge of feminism changed all of that in America and Europe. In part, this was a reflection of how industries were changing. Where farms and factories once employed most of the population, the country workforce shifted towards clerical and service work. Fortunately, there are still plenty of occupations that are dominated by men where you can escape the tyranny that is the modern feminist dominated work place. Given that so many jobs including women are legal minefields, as well as unpleasant and inhospitable to the masculine man, there are many reasons you should consider a change to a job where you can work in an all male environment.

[...]

Learn The True Meaning Of Teamwork

Are men or women better at working in teams? Although men are more individualistic, assertive, and aggressive, it is these very qualities that make them better at working in groups. Of course, it is a tired feminist talking point that “women value cooperation more than men do.” The truth is that women avoid overt conflict, but they love to keep drama bubbling under the surface. This translates to an atmosphere of mistrust in many teams that include women, even if females are experts at maintaining saccharine appearances.

Working with men only, one will find that conflicts are taken care of on the spot, preventing interpersonal problems from compounding; the assertiveness and aggression of men strengthens the group rather than weakens it. Working without the tensions that women cultivate, men are able to coalesce into ruthlessly efficient teams accomplishing feats from the heroic to the mundane that we take for granted (here, here, and here). Cooperative behavior releases dopamine to the brain in humans, which explains the immense pride that comes when you’re part of a group of men able to fight and work almost as one man, sometimes without even speaking. Camaraderie has been the drug of choice for men for time immemorial, and women’s preference for conflict destroys this.

Rediscover A Healthy Sense Of Mystery Around The Opposite Sex

In the past, men and women led lives that were parallel and interdependent but usually very separate. Men and women mingled together only at certain times of the day, or sometimes only certain times of the week or even year in the case of people who lived in rural areas. Every man enjoys the company of women, but most men become fatigued with too much. When men and women work separately, it cultivates a natural mystery and respect, so that time that men and women spend together is more appreciated. Presently, the sexes know each other too intimately, and familiarity leads to contempt. As any man who knows the ins and outs of the female mind will attest, the better you get to know women, the more you dislike them. Working a long day in the world of the masculine workplace, with its attendant cursing, laughing, and rough masculinity, one appreciates the contrasting feminine much more when he goes back to his woman (or women). Compare this with the modern workplace, where many men are so tired of feminine pettiness and drama by the end of the day that the prospect of being around women in the evening is exhausting.

[...]

Ditch The Corrosiveness That Women Bring To All Male Groups

In naval tradition, it was considered bad luck to have a woman on a ship, and this was more than a mere superstion ion. The introduction of a woman to an all male environment changes an atmosphere instantly. Obviously, there is the distraction, as focus that should be used to get work done is funneled into thoughts of fucking. But the really corrosive effect of women in all male workplaces is how it affects the way men treat each other. No longer are other men comrades and friends; they are competitors. This happens subconsciously, as men start to be suspicious of others and subtle posturing and power plays start. Once again, we see that the wisdom of our forefathers is usually superior to modern philosophies.

Conclusion

If you don’t already work in an all male occupation, you should explore ways to move into one. There are many fewer female free jobs than formerly, but they can be found with a little bit of digging. Perhaps I will write a post soon exploring the options available to young men starting their lives and older men looking to restart their lives (as an aside, one direction that I will specifically recommend against is the military; it has been thoroughly corrupted by feminism). If you’re ready to do embark on a path that will give you new respect for yourself and other men, start moving towards an all male job immediately. Your soul and your sanity will thank you for it.

Mjolnir, Return of Kings 32 Comments [7/29/2014 3:20:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102343

I love the last part, "Homosexuals harm no one.." Last I checked, necrophiliacs harm no one either. So do tree huggers and animal lovers. But then, harm is not limited to physical injury. There's psychological injury as well. Imagine what will happen to a kid who grew up in a world were homosexuals and necrophiliacs abound freely? It is comparable to a child raised up in a brothel. The prostitutes don't harm anyone but the child's mind will be warped by the realities of the world he grew up in. In the case of the child that grew up in a brothel, he starts seeing women as sex objects and nothing more. He will probably go and marry a lady one day with that mentality and if the lady should ever say no to sex one day, he will think he's being denied his rights no matter how reasonable or legitimate the wife's reason may be. His reaction might be to take what "belongs" to him by force and he Molests his wife. Meanwhile, someone is saying somewhere, prostitutes harm no one. They are just rendering a service. Now, in the other scenario, a child grows up in a world of gays, and necrophiliacs. What's to stop him from being a little bit innovative when he gets tired of the "norm" of his world. He might wake up one day and decide to take it up a notch by becoming an animal lover, after all he is hurting no one, right?

P.S. Am trying to approach this from a scientific and logical point of view because I can see clearly that you are an atheist. No matter the scientific proofs that comes up tomorrow making homosexuality or any other perversion pleasant and appealing to the world. As long as the Lord God Almighty is against it, so shall I be.

henryskywalker2003, Nairaland 45 Comments [7/28/2014 3:24:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: TheReasonator
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102342

People need to start thinking less and praying more.

Dave, Yahoo Answers 51 Comments [7/28/2014 3:24:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: ThatGuy
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102335

Homosexuality is actually a demon spirit. It is such a putrid smelling demon that other demons don't even like to hang around it. A genuine prophet of God told me that the Lord allowed him to smell this demon spirit, and he got sick to his stomach. And yet as humans, many embrace this demon. Yes, you heard me right. Being gay is demonic.

Bert Farias, Right Wing Watch 41 Comments [7/28/2014 3:20:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102332

[The post is titled "Debunking the Patriarchy Myth"]

[A painting from 1631 of a father wiping a baby]

So there you have it: The Patriarchy in action — changing diapers. This is before feminism, before women’s suffrage and before Susan B. Anthony’s great grandparents were born.

The painting is pretty funny to me, because I can so easily relate to the poor guy in the picture who has to wipe the kid’s butt. You can see him recoiling from the stench, arm hung to the side in resignation.

Tell me, if men were so privileged back then, why would they ever have to wipe a kid’s butt?

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 33 Comments [7/28/2014 3:17:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102330

Homosexuality is a preference which causes far more harm and disunity in society than it NEEDS to. What's more, and this is the important reason of why I think it's logical to phase it out at birth if we can, it ADDS nothing. There is nothing that anyone, by the simple virtue of being homosexual, adds to society, themselves or to others. All it is is sexual preference, the world will NOT become a bland uniform 1984-type scenario by making this decision. That's just ludicrous.

Lord Woodlouse, spacebattles 27 Comments [7/28/2014 3:10:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102329

Are you a Marcionite? Find out in one easy question!

Does this offend you?



If you answered Yes:
You are a Marcionite.
...
If you answered No:
You are an orthodox Christian (at least on this point). Congratulations!

Timothy Dukeman, Deeper than Sound-Bites 39 Comments [7/28/2014 3:10:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102327

I’m convinced that lots, and lots of normal, law-abiding men have “look, but don’t touch” feelings about 11 and 12 year old girls. And it’s not pedophilic at all. Same way being attracted to Helen Mirren’s figure in a red dress is not gerontophilic.

Emma the Emo, Just another student, discovering the truth about feminism 36 Comments [7/28/2014 3:08:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102326

The non-Calvinist might also say that the unfairness of Calvinism is in God creating Booker for the purpose of sending him to hell. In other words, under Calvinism, God actually wants Booker in hell—which seems unloving—whereas under a non-Calvinist view God lovingly wants him in heaven but is limited by what Booker himself will do.

I’ll talk about why the idea that God cannot create a world in which Booker chooses salvation is absurd some other time. For now, let’s suppose that’s true. How does that help the non-Calvinist?

Is it loving or fair for God, under freewill theism, to create Booker, knowing he will suffer eternal conscious punishment? What does it even mean to say that God wants Booker to be saved? Given that the choice is between creating him for eternal death, or not creating him at all, isn’t the only loving option to not create him?

Now of course, the non-Calvinist is welcome to say that God has some overriding reason to create Booker. The world in which Booker goes to hell, perhaps, is overall a better world than one without him, or one where he is saved. But that mimics the Calvinist’s argument! Under Calvinism, it is better that God be glorified through Booker’s reprobation than for Booker to be saved or not exist at all. The end for which God creates Booker is not reprobation itself. He does not want Booker in hell for its own sake, but rather for the purpose of revealing his perfection. A non-Calvinist might disagree about God’s ultimate goal, but his position remains functionally identical to Calvinism, and therefore offers no justification whatsoever for thinking that double predestination is unfair or unloving.


Dominic Bnonn, Thinking matters 29 Comments [7/28/2014 3:06:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 102323

So everything was great and blissful with my new discovery until, until I started to realize that the feminists would be opposed to my dream of me having a traditional family and that it would be hard for me to find a woman who didn’t want to work during her marriage with me. This is when my anti-feminism began in earnest. Very quickly my belief in patriarchy was no longer really about getting a woman at all and it was instead a kind of Holy Crusade to destroy feminism. Feminism was the great enemy lurking behind every bush and poisoning the minds of all the women around me and endlessly trying to threaten me and bully me to try to get me to become evil like them.

It is funny, why was it that I never experienced the fantasy of “taking care of” a woman until my mid-20s? I had definitely fallen in love before that time multiple times and I do remember feeling strongly protective towards women I was attracted to occasionally and seeking to be “controlling” at times and I did give women gifts a few times but it wasn’t until the point of my conversion to patriarchy that I actually had a full blown fantasy of “taking care of” a woman financially 100% like how the traditional family model worked. Looking back I am sure this was because I somehow knew or felt that it was “forbidden” and “shameful” for me to actually fantasize about and idealize taking care of a woman. That the very thought of “taking care of a woman” was repulsive and disgusting according to the feminist cultural messages that had been drummed into me my whole life. I think by the time I had reached my mid-20s I just didn’t really care anymore about the stigma I would face in wanting to “take care of a woman” because I was already being rejected by women anyways so it wasn’t like my situation would get any worse by trying something new.

So, I felt the forbidden feeling of wanting to take care of a woman and I had the forbidden thought that taking care of a woman was actually a morally good thing to do; that being the end of my time as a feminist man.

What happened next was that women rejected me because I was now pro-patriarchy and therefore “sexist” and an “oppressor” and things like that but after my conversion to patriarchy I experienced this rejection in a totally different way. After my conversion to patriarchy I experienced women’s rejection of me as proof of my heroism and good moral character and that I was standing up for what was right and that the feminist women were wrong. The feminist women were wrong because they wanted me to return to the man I was before who was rejected and hated by women for my weakness and who was immoral and selfish because I wasn’t giving to women what women needed from me and deserved from me as a man. I responded to women rejecting me romantically by turning my mind towards politics and the great crusade against feminism thinking if I couldn’t serve women through a personal relationship with a woman I could serve women through the political means of making the culture overall more friendly and supportive of women’s needs by making the culture overall patriarchal instead of feminist.

Jesse Powell, Secular Patriarchy 27 Comments [7/28/2014 3:06:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 10