Quote# 94447

Who said, "no matter can be created or destroyed"?

As a Christian, I reject the hypothesis that "no matter can be created or destroyed".

I believe what the scriptures state, that everything was created by the Word of God. God spoke, used the Logos/Word/Jesus, creation into existence.



Simple Math, Y! answers 48 Comments [5/22/2013 3:27:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 34

Quote# 94433

Last night I was debating some atheists in a PalTalk chat room. When I entered, one of them was on the microphone telling the room how evolution is a scientific fact and providing a few scanty details of why this is so. I got into the debate, and asked how their claim was evidence of evolution. When it was their turn to use the microphone in the chat room, they were unwilling to explain how it was evidence of evolution, but instead put forth a 2 minute diatribe of how ignorant and non-scientific creationists are because they deny the obvious fact of evolution. A few others in the chat room did exactly the same thing - make a claim, such as that changes to allele frequency over time is evolution, then when asked how it is evidence or a mechanism for evolution, they provide no explanation and instead provide a 2 minute long diatribe of how evolution is true and creationists are ignorant. After 30 minutes of this repeated failure of the evolutionists to support their claims, they got tired of being cornered for their inability to do so, and asked me for evidence of my "invisible magic man" having created life. So, I explained to them a single example of Irreducible Complexity of the many which could be provided - the fact that the machinery that decodes the genetic information in the DNA to produce proteins is itself encoded in the DNA.

The fact that the machinery which translates the genetic information to produce proteins is itself comprised of proteins is a game-ender for evolution theory. Since the machinery is a product of it's own translation, the DNA, the codes for proteins, and the environment of the cell which includes all of the rest of the features of the cell, must exist in order for the translation of protein codes to take
place. The components must already exist, fully-formed and fully functional, for any of them to exist. This is interdependency which cannot be broken, and therefore Irreducible Complexity. The components could not have evolved piecemeal. Let's imagine that the DNA is like a book coded in a specific digital language (DNA code is digital by the way). Encoded in that book is the machinery which is able to decode the book. In order to decode the book, you must retrieve the information which allows you to produce the decoder machine. The problem is, that since this information is encoded in the book, you cannot translate the code to produce this machinery unless the decoding machinery already exists outside of the source of information which produces the decoder!

What this means in short is that not only did the components exist together in the beginning, but the entire cell did as well because these components require the cell to exist. Since the cell exists all together and fully functioning, and since the cell contains the genome for the entire organism, it follows that the entire organism existed, fully-formed and fully functional in the beginning with no transition or intermediary steps involved whatsoever. One might as well say that the cow came into existence at once, eating grass, swishing it's tail, completely unaware of the fact that it did not exist a nanosecond ago. This is Special Creation, and science has provided empirical evidence of it.

Having provided this single example of Irreducible Complexity which also evidences Special Creation, the evolutionists in the chat room were unable to even address the issue, and simply got on the microphone, one after another, and claimed I had not provided evidence of creation, and insisted that I do so. They would not even discuss my example. I suppose their only defence was to outright dismiss my example, claim I had provided nothing, and demand that I did. I suspect this is because they were both unable to discuss the subject for lack of knowledge about it biologically, and also because they were dumbfounded that such evidence actually exists. The humorous aspect the the failure of every atheist in the room to actually debate evidences is that they actually go to chat rooms, bring up evolution, claim it is a science fact, and mock you for believing in creation.

Apparently, Sky Daddy must have something going, if someone like myself, who has no formal education in biology, is capable of acquiring enough knowledge of it on my own that prevents atheists, even genuine biologists, from being able to debunk what He has created with their pseudo scientific fantasy.

NephilimFree, What Darwin Didn't Know 57 Comments [5/21/2013 3:50:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 94431

I can provide 100 scientific evidences that the earth is not millions of yrs old. I'll be glad to do so in a debate with you in Skype sometime if you like. Atheists do indeed hate God. They hate him because He he is the standard for morality, and they have their own standards, and so they refuse to humble themselves to Him and His law.

NephilimFree, What Darwin Didn't Know 56 Comments [5/21/2013 3:49:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 42

Quote# 94428


n her article Why Megachurch Pastors Keep Falling Into Sexual Immorality, Jennifer LeClaire, editor of the right-leaning Christian news site Charisma, points out that pastors Loveless, Hunter and Hinn aren’t the only three to “rock their churches with sexual scandals” in recent times. LeClaire, author of a book titled Spiritual Warrior's Guide to Defeating Jezebel, takes the uncommon position of holding male Christian leaders accountable for their adulterous behaviors—well sort of. LeClaire attributes immorality and idolatry to the “spirit of seduction” of the biblical character Jezebel, who “woos people into sexual immorality and idolatry.”

She writes, “Sadly, the spirit of Jezebel is picking off pastors one by one as they succumb to the evil desires in their own hearts. Too few recognize the sinister workings of Jezebel's covert seduction. They’ve bought into what I call the ‘Jezebel deception’ and are either tolerating sexual immorality in the church or merely failing to recognize the true Jezebel in operation because they are on a witch hunt for controlling, manipulative women.”


Jennifer Leclaire, Alternet 33 Comments [5/21/2013 3:49:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Frostythesnowman

Quote# 94427

Faggots recruiting children -- again!

Rump rider recruiting of our children rolls on. For several decades there have been organized rump rider perverts working hard to recruit and train children into their perverted lifestyle. Television has broadcast programs such as Telletubies aimed at very young children and featuring an obviously perverted rump rider "tubie." Now their campaign to pervert the minds of young children is continuing with the distribution of gay children's books targeted at the very young reader, at children who's parents may not be aware that its gay literature. The new book, And Tango Makes Three depicts pervert faggots as harmless two penguins who adopt a baby penguin to raise as a young faggot. Read story.

Psychosexual perversion should not be taught to children. Bob supports the rights of sexual perverts to publish whatever perverted adult literature they want to destroy their filthy minds with. A right to free speech and publication does not translate into a right to spew filth among children. They have a right to speak and publish. They have NO right to force anyone else to listen or read. Their filth should be kept off of children's television and out of schools and children's sections at libraries. The deliberate campaign by sexual perverts to recruit children needs to be opposed strongly by concerned parents, and since cunts are incapable of reason it needs to be opposed especially by fathers. All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. In the face of perverted recruiting our children we good MEN must take strong effective action against these sexual perverts. Stop them by whatever means necessary to protect our children.

Since public libraries opened in the 19th century, unmarried lesbians have worked as librarians instead of as wives and homemakers. In public libraries across the country these sick female perverts are putting forth their sordid sexual lives in the hands of children. The librarian who does so should be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail. She is a disgrace to our community and does great harm to our children. She has violated the public trust and lost her feminazi "civil rights" to public employment.

Bob, The World According to Bob 56 Comments [5/21/2013 3:48:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: aebars

Quote# 94424

The problem with secular morality is that secular moral rules are based on secular, i.e., mortal authority, which means that they can be questioned, warped, bypassed or altogether ignored. Religious morality is based in divine authority which is by definition infallible and cannot be cheated around.

Most humans observe laws mainly because of the fear of punishment, there being relatively few evolved enough to restrain themselves from immoral actions even when there's no threat of punishment. Secular punishment, however, can be avoided - by bribing or evading law enforcement, by mitigating the penalty via judicial procedures (such as plea bargaining), and so on. Divine punishment, however, cannot be eluded or bribed - it is slow to come, but it is inevitable to arrive, and it is this inevitability of punishment that makes people think twice before indulging in crime. A godless thief will steal without remorse, since he knows the worst he can get is a few years in prison, but a person that believes in God will think twice before becoming a thief, since he knows a punishment awaits him at the end of his life even if he manages to dodge prison.

I find the lot of the folk believing in religious superstitions preferable to godlesness and total lack of restraint. Those who are evolved enough will rise above petty superstitions and refrain from immoral deeds anyway, but the lot who yet lack the ability to resist their base urges best fear at least something, however silly, to keep in check.

Sidhae, Nationstates 50 Comments [5/21/2013 3:46:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: zyr

Quote# 94421

[The movie this person is referring to is "Trembling Before G-d", a documentary about homosexuals in the Orthodox Jewish community.

Acceptance of homosexual behavior

I participate in a group in Jerusalem for people with homosexual attractions who want to reduce or change their homosexual behavior and/or attractions. There are currently about a dozen of us. I think I am therefore in a good position to evaluate "change" efforts. If people knew that these efforts involve working on assertiveness, self-esteem, and other aspects of character development, they wouldn't be so quick to dismiss reparative therapy and similar approaches. Harmful? Far from it. This is about personal development. I don't know anyone in our group who feels that they haven't benefitted from the experience.

[...]

Regarding the film, I recently attended a public screening of it at a Masorti synagogue, which was followed by an audience discussion. Some people saw this issue as being all about "tolerating people who are different", which is certainly a message promoted in the film, but I didn't see it that way. Should Orthodox Judaism allow openly-adulterous rabbis to lead congregations, or give public honors to intermarried congregants? So why should the community welcome openly-gay people, who are living with same-gender partners, as rabbis or synagogue presidents? Doing so would convey a lenient attitude toward something clearly contrary to Jewish tradition.

Anonymous, Aish.com 21 Comments [5/21/2013 3:26:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 94413

Televangelist Pat Robertson had some eyebrow-raising advice for a woman who wrote complaining of a cheating husband.

"I've been trying to forgive my husband for cheating on me," the viewer writes. "We have gone to counseling, but I just can't seem to forgive, nor can I trust. How do you let go of the anger? How do you trust again?"

While Robertson's co-host called infidelity "one of the ultimate betrayals," the controversial host disagreed.

"Here's the secret: stop talking about the cheating," Robertson advised.

"He cheated on you. Well, he's a man."

Robertson also suggested the writer be forgiving of her husband's transgressions and the "tendency of man."

"Does he provide a home for you to live in," Robertson said. "Does he provide food for you to eat? Does he provide clothes for you to wear? Is he nice to the children... Is he handsome?"

"Recognize also, like it or not, males have a tendency to wander a little bit," he added. "What you want to do is make a home so wonderful that he doesn't want to wander."

Pat Robertson, UPI.com 54 Comments [5/21/2013 3:24:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 37

Quote# 94412

An ad for car insurance apparently suggests much more.
One Million Moms, a group that monitors children's programming, is calling on Geico to pull a recent commercial featuring a woman apparently flirting with a talking pig calling it 'bestiality.'
In their press release, the organization says, 'The Geico marketing team may have thought this would be humorous, but it is disgusting to see how the company takes lightly the act of bestiality.'

The commercial features a young woman and a pig, apparently stranded in a broken-down car.
'Did you turn your ringer off so no one would interrupt us?'

The pig though, seems uninterested, in the young woman and shows off the mobile Geico app on his phone as well as the game Fruit Ninjas.
This is not the first time that One Million Moms has protested such a high-profile company for allegedly depicting bestiliaty.

Earlier the group found objection to a Skittles ad featuring a walrus.
On their Facebook page, the 'disgusting Geico ad' features over 130 likes and has been shared over 100 times.



One Million Moms, The Daily Mail 44 Comments [5/21/2013 3:23:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 31

Quote# 94409

Two religious leaders are threatening lawsuits if the city [San Antonio] doesn’t stop offering domestic partner benefits in light of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s advisory opinion saying they violate the state Constitution.

Pastor Gerald Ripley of Voices for Marriage and Philip Sevilla of Texas Leadership Coalition addressed the San Antonio City Council Wednesday, threatening lawsuits in order to stop the benefits from being offered if the city doesn’t end them by June 30, the San Antonio Express-News reports.

“Lawsuits will be filed if necessary,” Ripley said.

“We cannot allow this in San Antonio. We are not San Francisco,” Sevilla said.

City attorney Mike Bernard told the newspaper the city won’t change its policy until the U.S. Supreme Court rules in two key marriage equality cases.

San Antonio Mayor Julián Castro has supported the benefits and said last month Abbott’s opinion to take away the benefits would hold Texas back.

Gerald Ripley and Philip Sevilla, Dallas Voice 25 Comments [5/21/2013 3:23:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 94408

Heartiste and Steve Sailer provide compelling evidence that females should not be allowed to make their own sexual and reproductive choices. Their hormones make them stupid. Thus we have a bunch of baby murderers running around who will doubtless repeat their parent’s choices. And here is another video of raging hormones on parade. Most females, upon meeting a seemingly high status male, will jump his bones given a few minutes of opportunity, which is why societies where virginity was important and illegitimacy disastrous kept fertile age women on a very tight leash.

My personal highly unscientific observation is that the lower a woman’s self esteem, the better her behavior, and vise versa, since the lower her self esteem, the more vulnerable she is to social pressure and male authority. It is the girl with high self esteem that follows her pussy.

Jim, Jim's Blog 52 Comments [5/21/2013 3:23:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 47

Quote# 94394

[On president Obama calling to congratulate Jason Collins for coming out about his sexuality but not calling Tim Tebow to congratulate him for being Christian]

“We’ve got Tim Tebow who will kneel and pray to God on the football field. Meanwhile we have a professional athlete that decides he’s going to announce his sexuality and he gets a personal call from the United States to highlight the sexuality of a professional ballplayer. These are ways that the culture gets undermined, where it gets divided. The people over on this side take their followership from that kind of leadership. One notch at a time, American civilization, American culture, western civilization, western Judeo-Christiandom are eroded.”

Rep. Steve King, The Nation 81 Comments [5/19/2013 4:32:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 94390

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) lashed out at Democrats over the issue of abortion on Monday just minutes after a jury returned a guilty verdict in the high-profile case of an abortion doctor accused of multiple homicides.

“Democrats do not want abortion to be safe or rare,” Stockman said in a statement. “Democrats oppose even the most basic of health and safety standards for abortion mills. Democrats don’t care how many women are maimed, infected with diseases or die on the routinely-filthy abortion mills. Democrats worship abortion with same fervor the Canaanites worshipped Molech.”

Kermit Gosnell was found guilty of three counts of first-degree murder on Monday in Philadelphia and could face the death penalty. Gosnell was accused of performing partial-birth abortions and killing one woman.

Prosecutors believe he was involved in dozens of illegal late-term abortions, forcing the live births of fetuses up to eight months old, and in some cases “snipping” the spines of the babies that survived the abortion attempts with scissors.?? Media reports say some of the babies were born breathing and screaming, and that body parts were kept in jars around the filthy blood- and feces-stained clinic.

Gosnell was charged with partially delivering seven babies that were 24 weeks or older, although prosecutors say the actual number is far higher. He was also charged with the death of one of the mothers who went into cardiac arrest during a procedure.

No Democrats defended Gosnell’s crimes, and many denounced him. However, Stockman on Monday sought to tie Gosnell to the pro-abortion rights stances of many Democrats.

“The courts call it murder. Democrats call it ‘health care,’” Stockman said. “Despite the blood-soaked horror of Gosnell’s clinic, Democrats refuse to loosen their embrace of unrestricted, unregulated, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.”

“Even more chilling, as an Illinois state senator Barack Obama voted several times to make Gosnell’s inhuman crimes the law of the land,” he added. “I hope this verdict moves him to look into his soul and change his position.”

Rep. Steve Stockman, The Hill 66 Comments [5/19/2013 4:31:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 52

Quote# 94385

When Jesus said there would be signs in the sun, He didn't say that power grids would be knocked out or that solar flares, gamma rays, electromagnetic storms would always face the earth, and at times they will, He just said there will be signs in the sun.

So to me this is just another sign indicating that Jesus is coming very very soon!

raptureholic, Rapture Ready 49 Comments [5/19/2013 4:11:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: dylanstrategie

Quote# 94384

Unexpected prayer policy tabled by Oak Harbor council

News of a new policy restricting what should be said during council invocations spread quickly over the weekend, upsetting many who argue a change would violated people’s freedom of religion and speech.

At least a dozen people attended Tuesday night’s council meeting to speak out on the issue; some said they are specifically upset the proposals state that speakers should not invoke the name of a deity.

“When I read the proposed resolution I was deeply disturbed to find wording that would dictate to which God I may pray when offering an invocation here in the council chambers,” said Ron Lawler, pastor for Family Bible Church.

Oak Harbor, WA, Whidbey News Times 34 Comments [5/19/2013 3:22:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: emau99

Quote# 94380

Why do European and Negro Scholars in mainstream academia continue to run with the claim that Homosexuality existed among indigenous Africans prior to foreign contact.
I have yet to see legitimate untainted archeological anthropological and oral sources that detail homosexuality being practiced among our ancestors prior to colonization. Even RAPE was virtually unheard of in Africa prior to colonization.
So the question is why do these so called scholars keep running with this BLATANT LIE?
THEY ARE TRYING TO PUSH AN AGENDA!!

Mfon Amun Ptah, Tumblr 74 Comments [5/18/2013 4:20:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 58
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 94378

THEIR IS ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF SEXUAL PERVERSION AMONG INDIGENOUS AFRICANS PRIOR TO COLONIZATION AND CONTACT WITH FOREIGN PEOPLES.
There is no archeological evidence of Homosexuality, Bestiality, Pedophilia, Transexuality or any other Perverse form of European Sexuality among indigenous Africans prior to colonization and contact with foreign peoples.
There is no anthropological evidence of Homosexuality, Bestiality, Pedophilia, Transexuality or any other Perverse form of European Sexuality among indigenous Africans prior to colonization and contact with foreign peoples.
There is no literary evidence of Homosexuality, Bestiality, Pedophilia, Transexuality or any other Perverse form of European Sexuality among indigenous Africans prior to colonization and contact with foreign peoples.
There is no oral tradition of Homosexuality, Bestiality, Pedophilia, Transexuality or any other Perverse form of European Sexuality among indigenous Africans prior to colonization and contact with foreign peoples.
THERE IS NO PROOF OF ANY OF THESE THINGS AMONG INDIGENOUS AFRICANS PRIOR TO COLONIZATION AND CONTACT WITH FOREIGN PEOPLES!! ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF!!
Anyone who says that there is without showing it, is either a naive tool or is BLATANTLY part of the Agenda to promote sexual perversion among African People and Destroy the African family.

Mfon Amun Ptah, Tumblr 35 Comments [5/18/2013 4:20:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 44
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 94376

[Bastardization? Really? How am I corrupting these texts? Please feel free to explain because frankly its quite simple. God says babies are innocents. God says killing innocents is murder. God killed innocents. Fact fact fact based on your texts, all three. It looks like rather you are dissatisfied with my conclusion that your god committed murder.]

Dissatisfied sums it up, yeah. Can you not see how you cherry picked two unrelated sentences and forced them together to prove your point? The logic is clear... God has the capacity to know and judge fairly where you do not. Given the whole concept of fallibility as accepted by Christians and Jews, your idea that children are innocents is unfounded and unbiblical. Simple as that.

fr0d0, Atheist Forums 41 Comments [5/18/2013 4:19:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 94375

This is what I feel should be done about the homosexuality problem:

1. Repeal all gay "marriage" laws. They make no sense from a logical, legal, semantic, or philosophical standpoint. You can't have male hens and you can't have gay marriage.

2. Eliminate "civil unions" - see above.

3. Draft a Constitutional amendment preventing either of the above 2 points from ever being issues anywhere in the country.

4. Nullify all existing gay "marriages" and "civil unions". To allow them to continue to exist undermines the entire agenda.

5. Work to eliminate the arbitrary stigma toward reparative therapy.

6. Make said therapy mandatory for first-time offenses of displaying homosexual behavior in public.

7. Train all school counselors - from pre-K to college - in said therapy.

8. Make any public displays of homosexual misconduct a misdemeanor after the first.

I think this would really eliminate a lot of the problems homosexuals are causing. If you have any other ideas, let me know.

Vlad III, FSTDT Comments 68 Comments [5/18/2013 4:19:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 72

Quote# 94374

A feminist in the strict and proper sense may be defined as a woman who envies the male role.

By the male role I mean, in the first place, providing, protecting, and guiding rather than nurturing and assisting. This in turn involves relative independence, action, and competition in the larger impersonal society outside the family, the use of language for communication and analysis (rather than expressiveness or emotional manipulation), and deliberate behavior aiming at objective achievement (rather than the attainment of pleasant subjective states) and guided by practical reasoning (rather than emotional impulse).

Both feminist and nonfeminist women sense that these characteristically male attributes have a natural primacy over their own. I prefer to speak of "primacy" rather than superiority in this context since both sets of traits are necessary to propagate the race. One sign of male primacy is that envy of the female role by men is virtually nonexistent — even, so far as I know, among homosexuals.

Normal women are attracted to male traits and wish to partner with a man who possesses them. Healthy societies are marked by a cooperative reciprocity between the sexes, but an unequal one in the sense that it involves male leadership of the female, somewhat as in ballroom dancing.

The feminists' response to the primacy of male traits, on the other hand, is a feeling of inadequacy in regard to men — a feeling ill-disguised by defensive assertions of her "equality." She desires to possess masculinity directly, in her own person, rather than partnering with a man. That is what leads her into the spiritual cul de sac of envy.

And perhaps even more than she envies the male role itself, the feminist covets the external rewards attached to its successful performance: social status, recognition, power, wealth, and the chance to control wealth directly (rather than be supported). She tends not to give much thought to the great mass of men who struggle to fulfill the demands of their role without ever attaining the rewards of superior performance.

F. Roger Devlin, Thornwalker 38 Comments [5/18/2013 4:18:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 94372

I've heard stories about abortionists playing with the bodies of dead babies (like holding them up like dolls and making them "talk") and all kinds of other crazy crap that goes on in your regular run of the mill abortion clinic.

Rubystars, JTF.org 50 Comments [5/18/2013 4:18:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 50
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 94371

(On Minnesota's state senate passing a law to legalize gay marriage)

I love seeing the comments restarted...somebody must have had a good argument why SSM shouldn't be legalized. Something like incurring more to the states Debt to cover SSM benefits, lawsuits against churches for discrimination, that a small percent of Minnesotans get to redefine a term for the majority, that were passing laws just so we don't hurt someone's feelings, that the majority of MN's don't want SSM (which is a completely different argument than putting it in our constitution), It violates DOMA. If it does pass, I wonder what's next from the bullies and incompetent legislature?

justusecnn, startribune.com 31 Comments [5/18/2013 4:09:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
Submitted By: Jason_the_Cripple

Quote# 94370

I have a theory. First, I'll mention that there exists a theory (posed by 2 mathematicians who analyzed statistical data) that suggests that homosexuality is caused by a virus, to which a fetus is exposed in the mother's body. My theory is that liberalism is also caused by a virus, and the two viruses are linked. I am saying this because liberalism is suicidal. A group of biologically healthy organisms would not espouse an ideology that leads to their demise. It is unnatural and sick, in a literal sense. I have also noticed that there are very few liberal Jews among those who came from the former USSR. This would be consistent with the virus theory, becauses viruses are spread geographically.

Masha, JTF.org 47 Comments [5/18/2013 3:29:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 44
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 94368

Thoughts on Weekend events
For the past few years since the arab springs I have been keeping my eyes glued to the news and events that has been happening around he world and United States. I noticed when something happens... like natural disaster, shootings, failing economies, etc.... all those stuff seems to happen during the week not the weekend. I also notice there are absolute no update or interesting news starting from Thursday til Sunday. All this makes me wonder when Jesus comes to get his bride before God's wrath would probably occur on a weekend since we are not to know the day or hour of his return. No one would expect anything to happen on a weekend.

Has anyone noticed this??

Shannon9602 , RR 55 Comments [5/17/2013 3:28:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: lisa

Quote# 94366

Signed, sealed and delivered, the death of the "Re-PUNK-licans" but much worse is the death of America and the birth of AMERIKA! We , as we desrve will be feeling the wrath of God! I personally believe that he is using this Muslim-Marxist jihadist to punish this nation, as he had done to Israel in the past, for turning away from Him! Button up your seat belts as the ride is about to get really horrific - this I guarantee you!

David Veselenak, Political Outcast 48 Comments [5/17/2013 3:28:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 33