[the women are not responsible. if a man cant control himself to match his wives sex drive, then he is solely responsible for that.]
Nonsense! Since she is not to withhold, her drive is not the big issue. Her submission in that area is. If parents don't feel like feeding their kid, tough! It is something that must be done, a need.
61 comments
So much for free will.
Now go DIAF.
having a few problems in the underwear department are you ?
your meat and two veg is a limp snag and two peas
got your wedding tackle in a knot
the one eyed trouser snake is dead
your tube steak is limp
the donger is dead
And this kind of attitude is why marital rape has been added to the laws. Just because you somehow managed to fool a woman into marrying you doesn't mean she has to spread her legs every time you decide you want a piece. I hope your personal doormat one day gets tired enough or your bs and gives you a good swift kick in the berries or several. Marriage is about the joining of two people who love each other into an equal partnership. It's not about you getting your own personal cook, maid, and sex slave for the price of a ring.
Here's three hints from a real live woman, dad.
1) We like good sex. We hate sex of the "wham-bam no thanks ma'am" variety.
2) Making sex a right on your part, and an obligation on ours is a damn big turn off .
3) See a shrink.
"If parents don't feel like feeding their kid, tough! It is something that must be done, a need."
Sex is not a need in the same way food is because YOU DON'T NEED SEX TO LIVE. Why is that so hard to grasp? I'm so fucking sick of seeing this stupid sex=food comparison everywhere. They're not remotely the same.
Thinking Allowed, I read the entire thread I get the impression he had a wife (hes single now, as he says) but she wouldnt sleep with him and he cheated on her. And now they are both gone. Which is why he is now blaming women for everything under the sun.
Its hard to tell of course, coherency isnt a strong point of his.
People NEED to eat to stay alive. They don't NEED to fuck. The two things aren't comparable.
Although, if a wife stops having sex with her husband altogether (or a husband stops having sex with his wife), I sort of can't blame the other partner for looking elsewhere for sexual satisfaction. Depending on the circumstances. But no-one should be forced to have sex against their will, married or not.
Lol. I'd like to see you try the submission thing with me.
We'll see who ends bound, gagged and with a cockring in place for a very long time... except misogynist losers like you wouldn't even get a chance to breath the air near me in the first place. Or they'd have their eyes ripped off. Whatever happens first.
Marital rape for Jesus.
*vomits*
If parents don't feel like feeding their kid, tough!
Someone near this asshole call child services. It's not the misogyny that gets me, it's not the fundie, it's that this bastard said that.
Unfortunately, you're still "human" so I can't recommend we line up all the specimens like you and have them done with by firing squad. I hope you die alone with a Fleshlight attached to your dick.
I must admit that the idea of that asshole dying from penile gangrene after using a sabotaged Fleshlight isn't without a certain appeal...
Thinking Allowed wrote:
I wonder what he does when his wife is on her period, presuming he has a wife.
Presumably she has to move out of the house, live in a shed at the far end of the garden for seven days and then sacrifice two doves as per Leviticus 15.
Unlike you, most men are perfectly capable of controlling themselves, the fact that you cannot is failure on your part, not a general situation among men, and we females are not responsible for the failure of the minority of men who are idiots and cannot control their own behavior.
I used to be married to a man who thought exactly the way you do, Dad, and I sincerely hope that one day you happen upon a woman whose family is actually protective enough of her to beat you into a bloody pulp for what you intend to do to her.
I guess he will have to take a page from JohnR7's book and find some mail order bride to marry. Of course, he will find himself sleeping in the dog house after a few months when she learns about what a pathetic loser she married and shows him that she has a mind of her own (and probably a lot sharper then his).
What about the woman's need? Shouldn't the husband submit too? Sex drive can be appeased on your own, you know.
If one party is repressing his or her sexual feelings and needs most of the time, he or she will soon repress his or her feelings of love for the other person, as well.
Give and take is a better option. Sure, sometimes you can give the other person a bit of sex even though you are not all that into it, but it must be a two way giving.
Feeding your kids is a bad analogy. Eating is a primary need, without food and water you die. You don't die without sexual release, or all the fundies saving themselves for marriage would die like flies.
Just why the hell would you want some action from a unwilling participant (wife or not) in the first place asshat?!
it's only pleasurable if the other party is being pleasured.
If your needs aren't in synch then you need to take responsibilty, show some respect, and take care of your business on your own.
You knuckle-draggers give us men a bad name.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.