No, you are not Homo sapiens sapiens. Since you can't prove that you are, it remains a neo-Darwinist religious and racial assumption on your part. When you get some observable evidence of your being Homo sapiens sapiens which we all can see, please notify us.
In the meantime, you're just another ordinary human being, as far as I can tell.
Nothing special about you neo-Darwinists at all.
37 comments
"Seriously though, wht is Crawford's deal with the term Homo Sapiens?"
Probably that it includes the term 'homo', and he's sort of a homophobe, sooo...
Does anyone have an account on Christian Forums?
If you do, ask him for permission to exhume his parents' corpses and measure the volume of their brain cavity. If it comes out to be approximately 1400cc's, then either he's a normal homo sapiens, or his parents were both sub-normal H. Neanderthanensis, because they had larger brains.
That should start him off on a great tirade. :D
In the actual post, he didn't even write the words 'Homo sapiens sapiens'. He instead used the abbreviation 'Hss'. It seems like he doesn't want to infect his typing fingers with the left-wing, abhorrent, sodomic word 'Homo'.
Even mentioning H-se*uality might convert healthy young boys to degenerate zombies, see?
Well, there is plenty of paleontological evidence, you know, bones and remains. Sorry if you live in the gingerbread world.
>>Crosis
Redhunter, \"Homo sapiens sapiens\" is recognized as a subspecies of \"Homo sapiens\". What the distinction is, I don't know. <<
Homo sapiens sapiens is us.
Homo sapiens includes us and the no longer distinct populations of homo sapiens idaltu, homo sapiens neanderthalensis, and potentially a couple of other groups.
Are you speaking to an Australopithecine? A Darwinist Australopithecine? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Humans are apes just as much as Gorillas, Orang-Utans, Chimpanzees, Gibbons and Bonobos are. You should be proud.
This reminds me of a stand-up's bit about the French translation of Tim Burton's remake of Planet of the Apes . Wahlberg calls one of the apes a monkey, and he indignantly responds "Monkey? I'm an ape, not a monkey! How dare you call me a monkey?"
Since singe is the French for both monkey and ape (and non-human primates generally), in the French cinema the ape replied "Singe ? I am le singe , not le singe ! How dare you call me singe ?"
Apparently the French audience appreciated the implicit existential crisis.
John must have a similar language difference? That or he's an idiot.
"No, you are not humans. Since you can't prove that you are, it remains a neo-Darwinist religious and racial assumption on your part. When you get some observable evidence of your being humans which we all can see, please notify us."
What the actual fuck.
Homo sapiens sapiens is the name we have given our species; that being the case, the claim "I am a homo sapiens sapiens" is true by definition.
Read your Hume and you'll find out that claims of truth by definition are the only ones that can be proven with 100 percent certainty. It's as patently true as any claim you'll ever hear, and you still don't believe it. You are hopeless.
Hey, John, you're epidermis is showing!
Good thing you have your skin covered up.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.