Jason Salamone #homophobia #kinkshaming

Jason Salamone #homophobia #kinkshaming barbwire.com

As far as HIV goes, it’s only common sense that an increase of using the rectum, which primary purpose is waste disposal, for sexual intercourse, is going to increase HIV infection rates, not decrease them. If a man has anal sex with a woman, he is committing a homosexual act on a woman, being that in homosexual acts the rectum is always the substitute for the vagina, so think about that next time you want to degrade your wife—even if she says she enjoys it—that doesn’t make the act less degrading or more right.

[...]

Same-sex “marriage” is legislation that endorses and affirms homosexual sex as a positive good. It is a sexual behavior that is not equal to sex between a man and a woman; again, different behaviors result in different outcomes—.and it is definitely NOT a positive good. The fact is, homosexual sex is an unnatural and unhealthy practice, and should be discouraged at least the same way we discourage cigarette smoking.

Again, same sex “marriage” is an endorsement of a very risky behavior, so we must constantly point out the health risks associated with it.

[...]

Pornography, even man-woman porn is homosexual in nature, because it takes sex and degrades it to be about self pleasure for the viewer. Homosexuality is about an attraction towards “sameness.” And since pornography directs pleasure towards self-arousal, and does so initially even when watched with a partner, it has the same narcissistic element to it. This is difficult to explain and hard for the average person to understand at first, but as you continue your walk towards being more Christ-like, it will begin to make sense. Avoiding pornography is a key element in helping overcoming same sex attraction.

41 comments

old comment by OHP

++"If a man has anal sex with a woman, he is committing a homosexual act on a woman, being that in homosexual acts the rectum is always the substitute for the vagina"

That makes you an atheist, then, being that the internet is used by us to discuss the wealth of evidence that directly contradicts your religion. That you have your own websites dedicated to using it in your own way is apparently immaterial.

++"This is difficult to explain and hard for the average person to understand at first, but as you continue your walk towards being more Christ-like, it will begin to make sense."

Anything can make sense when you purposefully switch off your critical thinking skills and accept the "because the ancient book says that god said so back thousands of years before it was itself written down" explanation for everything. That's not a state to be proud of achieving.

old comment by

Mixed-race “marriage” is legislation that endorses and affirms mixed-race sex as a positive good. It is a sexual behavior that is not equal to sex between a man and a woman of the same race; again, different behaviors result in different outcomes.and it is definitely NOT a positive good. The fact is, mixed-race sex is an unnatural and unhealthy practice, and should be discouraged at least the same way we discourage cigarette smoking.

I've seen this shit before...

Oh, and Jason? You'll find that Anal sex has much reduced risk of certain other STD's... I can only assume you will be pointing out those health BENEFITS when talking about it, or are you simply just lying by omission... (like I need to ask...)

old comment by Goomy pls

As far as HIV goes, it’s only common sense that an increase of using the rectum, which primary purpose is waste disposal, for sexual intercourse, is going to increase HIV infection rates, not decrease them.

Except HIV is not transmitted through feces.

If a man has anal sex with a woman, he is committing a homosexual act on a woman, being that in homosexual acts the rectum is always the substitute for the vagina, so think about that next time you want to degrade your wifeeven if she says she enjoys itthat doesn’t make the act less degrading or more right.

Not every homosexual performs anal sex. Also, the defining trait of "homosexual acts," if anything, should be that they are being performed between parties of the same sex.

Same-sex “marriage” is legislation that endorses and affirms homosexual sex as a positive good. It is a sexual behavior that is not equal to sex between a man and a woman; again, different behaviors result in different outcomes.and it is definitely NOT a positive good. The fact is, homosexual sex is an unnatural and unhealthy practice, and should be discouraged at least the same way we discourage cigarette smoking.

Insert obligatory long list of animals that express homosexuality in nature here.

Again, same sex “marriage” is an endorsement of a very risky behavior, so we must constantly point out the health risks associated with it.

The only reason it's risky to be gay is that people like you mistreat them for simply being attracted to persons of the same sex.

Pornography, even man-woman porn is homosexual in nature, because it takes sex and degrades it to be about self pleasure for the viewer. Homosexuality is about an attraction towards “sameness.” And since pornography directs pleasure towards self-arousal, and does so initially even when watched with a partner, it has the same narcissistic element to it. This is difficult to explain and hard for the average person to understand at first, but as you continue your walk towards being more Christ-like, it will begin to make sense. Avoiding pornography is a key element in helping overcoming same sex attraction.

This person just has to be a Poe.

old comment by Anton

Sodomy is a means of demeaning or degrading others. That is its function. Check any theory of personality and you'll find that perceived status is an important ingredient of character or personality. You would be a fool not to consider status dynamics as having a place in sexual relationships. If you look you will find the evidence e.g. the rich man with his beautiful trophy female, even a series of them. Another is the fact that in most societies homosexuals, stereotyped as sodomists, are given low status as a group although talented individuals might rise above it. The ancient Greeks understood the status connection better than we moderns: to them male prostitutes, making their living from sodomy, were the lowest forms of life, worse than slaves. Occasionally the same idea pops into modern consciousness but it is quickly snuffed out by the political correctness tabu system.

I'm predicting that the current liberal program to raise the status of homosexuals will largely fail because of laws of social psychology. Whether we like it or not some behaviours are inherently low status. Why? Because we evolved that way. The noisy arguments between gays and so-called homophobes is all sound and fury. Nature will have her way in the long run. And truths long suppressed by secular liberal superstition will have their revenge.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Antbrain

"Sodomy is a means of demeaning or degrading others."

Now where have we heard that before...?:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=91569&Page=3#1487204 (From CARM Forums thread):

Does Daniel 12:2 Really Teach Sodomy?'

@His4Life

"Hi everyone,

My name is Marissa and I am a relatively new believer. I was saved a little over one year ago and have since joined a small, nondenominational church. It's a great congregation - the people are loving, the music is uplifting and I feel like Christ is exalted every week. So far I have found all of my pastor's sermons to be insightful and Bible-based, but a comment he made this morning left me scratching my head.

He was talking about the judgment of unbelievers and used Daniel 12:2 as the text for his sermon. I agreed with most of what he said about the text, but he interprets the reference to "shame and humiliation" to mean that the unsaved will be sodomized before being cast into hell. He claimed in his sermon that at the time the Bible was written, it was common for conquering generals to abuse prisoners of war in this way and that it would mark a person as "unclean" and prevent them from re-entering their community. In the same way, he claims, the unsaved will be kept out of heaven and will be eternally seen as "unclean" in the eyes of God."

I wonder...!

@OHP

"@Anton:

Let's cut through he common lies and distortions and get to the big offense: you have no place accusing others of "superstition". At all."

Or 'ad hominems':

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=105030&Page=1#1737954

old comment by Swede

How did a man having intercourse with a woman become homosexual?
You do know that there are homosexual women too, right?

If neither sexual partner has HIV, the manner of sex you use does not increase HIV infection rates.

A marriage is a legal contract between two (sometimes more) consenting adults*, who intend to spend their lives together, and support each other financially. You don't have to have sex to get married, stupid, and you don't have to get married to have sex.

If you clean out the rectum and soften the sphincter up sufficiently, it has a very similar outcome as PIV sex with a condom; satisfaction; relaxation and bonding.

Same is not the same as self, silly.
It's very difficult to explain, indeed, as it's arrant nonsense!

* Or should be, but millions of young girls in Africa (and other places) are married off as soon as they start menstruating, to old men, and often have their first child around 10 years of age. Many of those who don't have access to c-section operations die during labor, as their bodies are not ready to give birth yet. THIS is a real problem, a definite unnatural and unhealthy practice that ought to be discouraged, immediately. But, instead you focus on consenting adults who enjoy having sex with each other and suffer little or no harm from it, asshole!

old comment by Anton

@Paul Dirac

"Like being a bigot or a religious zealot."

You are a poor sociologist. Religious zealots can have high status e.g. the high ranking clerics who rule Iran. I am not saying they deserve it, of course, but they certainly have status.

As for bigots, the most bigoted, abusive group that I have observed on the Internet are gay activists and their fellow travellers and dupes. One also observes similar bigotry on the streets in gay "pride" marches. But they have stiff competition from rabid Moslems. Gays of course bait Christians and Moslems bait Jews.

Despite the legal gains of homosexuals, I'm predicting that the heterosexual majority will continue to see homosexuals as of somewhat lower status. There are a number of reasons. One is that homosexuals are one of the few minority groups that regularly stigmatise themselves by their very behaviours.

old comment by Anton

@mister spak.

Assumptions are true or false. "Ïnvalid" refers to reasoning. You have demonstrated neither on my part.

So called liberalisation is partly illusory. My observation is that so-called liberals can be two-faced, being nice to gays in public but deriding them in private. Social history shows that attitudes change. Liberal is not permanently liberal. Liberationist movements can produce backlashes. For example, some folk are tiring of in your face gay pride marches. People start to wonder if there's something abnormal about people forever announcing how proud they are of private behaviours. It's self-obsessive behaviour designed to silence inner doubts. Surely.