Logical proof that most atheists are weak-minded
Definition of weak-minded: lacking determination, emotional strength, or intellectual capacity.
Before reading the material below, please read article Low-heeled feminists vs. Richard Dawkins and atheism
Consider:
1. Most atheists are men.
2. Feminist women conquered the atheist movement (Again, please read Low-heeled feminists vs. Richard Dawkins and atheism . See the significant drop in Google queries for the terms atheist/atheism/Richard Dawkins post Elevatorgate controversy).
...
If only atheists were more like evangelical men whose wives were taught to obey them. In biblical Christianity, women cannot teach men and they cannot exercise authority over men as far as church matters. If only atheists women could not exercise authority over atheist men about atheist matters, the humiliation of the atheist movement being conquered by feminist women could have been avoided! Soon atheist, feminist women will impose the "one true definition of atheism" and make all atheist men memorize it!
Oh, atheist men! Feel the sting of atheism being conquered by feminist women.
36 comments
This is obviously Ken DeMeyer, one of the two men who were 'Conservative' at Conservapedia (the other one was Rich Allen).
His huge body of work there is conclusive proof that he himself is weak-minded.
1. Most atheists are people.
2. What about feminist men?
Biblical Christianity sounds very outdated and cumbersome.
Were you planning on making any sense with this, honey? If so, you failed miserably.
Sure, I'm a feminist woman, but many feminist and/or atheists men concur with me that atheism is the lack of belief in gods. Feminism is the radical idea that women are people too.
How was atheism conquered, and why was it men's property in the first place?
This reminds me of watching Birth of a Nation, when the big horror I was supposed to react to was basically interracial marriage; it may have been scary for white people years ago, but now it's a total dud.
Same with this: atheists listen to women? Apparently terrifying to some people, but they are probably all fundies, and it only shows how backward they are.
You should look in the mirror before you accuse someone of lacking intellectual capacity.
As for determination and emotional strength, acting like a feces flinging zoo monkey does not help your cause.
"If only atheists were more like evangelical men whose wives were taught to obey them."
Those are not strong minds: Theirs are weak minds who want to keep those of women even weaker so they do not have to face a challenge they can only lose. Of course, as millenia of whining demonstrate, misogynists have NEVER managed to "put women into their place", at least not to their satisfaction. Controlling women is not just evil: It is pointless and futile.
I, with utmost certainty, desire a woman with a strong mind, so we can inspire each other, share our intellects and spar with rapier wits.
"If only atheists were more like evangelical men whose wives were taught to obey them."
You mean the same evangelicals who have a high divorce rate in general and a higher one than atheists specifically? Considering that you clearly dislike atheism I'd think that you want to see "the movement" collapse. Or do you dislike feminism so much that you loathe the idea of feminists having any type of success whatsoever even a wholly imaginary one? I'm guessing that's your issue.
Logic only really works when you start with a logical and real premise. You don't have one.
Definition of weak-minded: lacking determination, emotional strength, or intellectual capacity.
Damn, that mirror is really shiny.
the Oxford English dictionary, which imposes the one true definition of every word, is unfortunately not completely staffed by feminists. Perhaps they could follow the lead of NASA, and have a junior lexicographers' camp to attract more.
AFAIK, Atheism consists of not believing in Gods. Besides that there are no atheist matters, there is no authority to be exercised, there is, in fact, no atheist movement.
Once again, you have confused atheism with something else entirely.
Atheism+ didn't conquer anything except the credibility of those supporting it.
And there are lots of atheist women speaking in the community. The only people who are unwelcome are those who believe that feminism, feminists or women should be above criticism.
So female atheists don't exist? I've never seen that one before. If this confused man has difficulty accepting my existence, I'd be more than happy to repeatedly punch him in the face to prove just how real I am.
Evangelical men have proven themselves time & time again, to be the most miserable excuses for men that one could possibly dig up. They are generally bullies, hypocrites, thieves & wife beaters. They are filth that has somehow learned to walk upright.
I'm an atheist with an IQ in the upper 1% of the population. I'm also a male and a feminist, and see women as my equal. I don't allow women or men to "exercise authority" over me beyond that which is mandated by law or contract.
Atheism has only one definition, the lack of belief in deities. Not much room for any new interpretations.
"If only atheists women could not exercise authority over atheist men about atheist matters..."
She: "Feeling the presence of any gods today?"
He: "No."
She: "Are you sure?"
He: "Yes."
She: "Did you check under the bed?"
He: "No."
She: "Why not?"
He: "Because there are no gods under the bed, either."
She: "Well OK, but don't let me catch you believing!"
I have no idea what this guy is talking about. Low-heeled feminists? Is that like a new version of an old Traffic song, maybe? The High Spark of Low Heeled Feminists?
And I had no idea what "Elevatorgate" even was until just now. I guess I must not be part of the "atheist movement" (despite being an atheist for over half of my life), I didn't realize it was "conquered" by Richard Dawkins making some possibly insensitive remarks about what sounds like a really minor incident.
"evangelical men whose wives were taught to obey them."
Josh Buggar.
At least Richard Dawkins has been married three times; no need for Adultery on his part.
...but Buggar's part has caused him to be Adulterous, so thank you for proving the moral superiority of Atheism.
Looks like his response to being quoted here was to tuck his tail between his legs and whimper off to parts unknown.
I wonder what caused this hasty retreat; was it the fact that he was rightly called out for being a Creedist asshole, or that he was proven (and so easily) to be in error about the existence of Feminist Atheists?
Either way, he lacks the courage of his convictions. Time to apply some Preparation H to that butthurt and shut the fuck up.
Straight out jealousy over the fact that many men can have relationships that are better outside of the Conservative forced society. Your divorce rates are higher for one thing because your women aren't remotely happy and grow to despise your bullshit. You keep harping about women voting which just proves you can't trust your wives to vote for your guy.
How about improving yourselves instead of just pretending and talking like you're something?
Oh, so the idea - not necessarily a fact, but an idea - that women are leading the atheist "movement" is supposed to be a mark of shame to it now? This guy is triggering me, and I'm not even a woman. A pity, too - just as I was beginning to think that humanity had progressed somehow, the universe callously threw you at me just to prove my quaint notion wrong.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.