That's leads me to another question. If man and other living animals were formed by fish that left the water and grew legs billions of years ago, why would the evidence of mudskippers lead one to believe in "evolution" considering this seems like a regression?
I mean really, if we have already developed from fish that grew legs doesn't it seem that the appearance of another fish "walking" on land is slightly behind that which has already (apparently) happened?
26 comments
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
