There is no two ways around it. Overeducating women is bad for society. There is a reason women weren't historically schooled past an eighth-grade education. Hypergamy means most of the intelligent and highly-educated women will never marry or have children, guaranteeing that the next generation will be less intelligent than the previous one. It is a disastrously dysgenic social policy.
15 comments
You want to tell that to my mom, who had a college education and sent my sister and me to college? You want to tell that to me, who sent a daughter to MIT and Harvard? You want to tell that to my daughter, who is raising my happy, bright grandchild? All of us did that while married to college-educated men. All of us think you're dumber than a bag of doorknobs.
Overeducating
No such thing. Anything you have to say is meaningless after that word... not that you have much to say of any worth even if this clear statement of your hatred for knowledge hadn't betrayed your complete inferiority.
"Super-intelligence" my ass.
Translation:
I most certainly want to marry and have children with an intelligent and highly-educated woman. *sigh* one day...
I used to think all these claims of sexism on the internet are just exaggerations made by bitter feminists. While true in some cases, I surfed around a bit and instead of finding easy-going guys just joking around (which I would be fine with), I mostly found angry, bitter genuinely sexist conspiracy tripe like this. These people are just as bitter as the single cat lady reading Dworkin.
A superintelligence fleeing the country to avoid taxes and marrying a mail-order bride from an inferior race, on the other hand, is not dysgenic at all.
Even according to his own twisted worldview, Vox Dunning-Kruger is scum.
I honestly believe this line of argument, as much as immigration and trade, is what made the (proto) alt-right shed its libertarian/free market pretenses; how the hell you do square an opposition to taxation and welfare with the brutal crippling of much of the population for the benefit of other members? Under a more conventional GOP paradigm fixated on rugged bootstrap individualism and not "punishing success," how do you then go on to condemn individual success and achievement and prevent it for the "common good" that fails to justify far milder redistribution efforts? Every mildly clever girl is a Randian hero under such a system.
Suppressing women so "beta's" can get their dicks wet makes them the ultimate welfare kings, so naturally the alt-right found itself considerably friendlier to economic interventionism and public assistance.
Societies which refuse to educate women waste talent. They also nearly always engage in various other talent-wasting practices, usually in the name of "social stability". In practice it mostly ends up reducing the frequency of social disruptions while increasing their severity, and also producing periods of stagnation where they fall behind less talent-wasting cultures.
...I think that might have been a little too clinical, but you get the idea.
Listening to misogynist assclowns like me is bad for society.
Fixed that for you, VD.
My very intelligent colleague, whose job is equaled by no man's(even me, who she is supposed to follow - in fact I let her alone, she's better when left autonomous), did marry last saturday. She did plan 2-3 children.
(bonus points : her skin is dark colored)
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
