www.itsnobody.wordpress.com

itsnobody #fundie itsnobody.wordpress.com

I’m trying to start a new petition to view atheists as fully subhuman, subhuman beings.

I had a petition on another site but some atheists cried and got it removed for “hate speech” or whatever, nasty people always trying to force and impose their way and their beliefs onto the entire world.

So if you agree with me that atheists should be viewed as subhuman just a post a comment, it’ll count as like a signature.

On my other blog post I explained why I view atheists as fully subhuman as opposed to partially human or human:

Reasons for viewing atheists as fully subhuman:

Atheists refuse to oppose racism and nationalism but voice up their position on things like gay rights and abortion rights
100% of all modern day atheist countries are extremely racist/nationalist beyond imagination (Denmark, Sweden, Latvia, Estonia, New Zealand, and every other atheist country)
Atheists and the atheist-controlled media refuse to attack free-will believers like how they attack Creationists even though the scientific evidence telling us that free-will is non-existent is like a million times more concrete than the evidence supporting evolution(young Earth Creationists are more rational than free-will believers)
Atheists refuse to acknowledge the undeniable historical consensus that religion directly caused the scientific revolution and insist on telling lies thoroughly debunked by historians (there aren’t any modern day historians that believe in the “Dark Ages” lie portrayed in the atheist-controlled media)
Atheists refuse to acknowledge the undeniable historical fact that Faraday’s religion directly caused Maxwell’s Equations to come into existence, and instead lie and portray the opposite
Atheists are trying to redefine the definition of science so that all that matters is authority and incredulity instead of empirical observations and valid reasoning, turning science into pseudoscience
Atheists are trying to throw away a very important principle in science – criticism and scrutiny, and turn science into pseudoscience
Atheists don’t allow people to question, scrutinize, and criticize atheistic arguments, they just breakdown and cry and interpret any criticism as “trolling”
Atheists insist on telling many lies thoroughly debunked by historians and scientists (see my post “Common Lies Spread By Atheists“)
– From post, Reasons for viewing atheists as subhuman beings

itsnobody #fundie itsnobody.wordpress.com

What a great fool it is to be an atheist.

Now the fools (atheists) have come up with more lies/atheistic propaganda. They discourage criticism and scrutiny of their atheistic propaganda because they know that their propaganda is all wrong and false.

Why would an atheist allow people to question, criticize, and scrutinize their propaganda since they are staunch anti-science fanatics and strongly the oppose the concept of criticism and scrutiny (one of the main principles in science).

Atheists claim that “less religious or atheist nations are more peaceful” and point out the murder rates in like 3-5 supposedly atheist countries (Denmark, Sweden, and New Zealand).

Now it’s time for me to debunk this claim:
Counterexamples:
Religious countries in Northern/Western Europe with lower murder rates than New Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden:
– Austria
– Switzerland
Austria is one of the most religious countries in Northern/Western Europe according to the 2005 Eurobarometer poll, and Austria’s murder rate is lower than all atheist countries in Europe and lower than every single US state as well.
Less Religious and atheistic countries with high murder rates:
– Estonia
– Latvia
– North Korea
Estonia is the country in Europe with the lowest percentage of believers in God (lower than all the other countries in Europe) according to the 2005 Eurobarometer poll and 2008 Gallup poll and Estonia’s murder rate is consistently one of the very highest in Northern Europe year after year.

So this claim has thoroughly been falsified by me with counterexamples to both (religious countries with low murder rates and atheistic countries with high murder rates).

I wonder why atheists conveniently leave out Estonia when mentioning how peaceful atheist countries are? It’s probably because they feel bad that multiple sources clearly show that Estonia is the least religious country in the world and that Estonia consistently has the highest or one of the highest murder rates in Europe.

What a shame Estonia is for atheists.

Correlation is not causation:
Distorting statistics to support propaganda is easy since correlation is not causation.

The countries atheists point out as being “peaceful” had low murder rates long before they were less religious or atheistic.

Since they had low murder rates long before they were less religious or atheistic this tells us there’s absolutely no causal link between religiosity and murder rates, meaning the reason these supposedly “atheist” countries have low murder rates is despite being atheistic.

Racism is peaceful?:
The countries atheists point out as being peaceful also happen to be the most racist countries in the world (according to all the studies done). Is a country with daily or weekly racism what atheists consider as peaceful?

But I forgot, atheists don’t consider racism to be immoral or not peaceful.

100% of all atheist countries are extremely racist, there is not even one atheist country in the entire world that is not extremely racist.

What a great fool it is to be an atheist, it’s no wonder they discourage criticism and scrutiny of basically all of their claims and any other claim that they personally agree with.

If a claim really is true then it will stand up to any amount of criticism and scrutiny, which is why atheists strongly discourage criticism of any claim that they personally agree with (knowing that it’s all wrong and false).

If we are to be honest with ourselves we can see that truthfully atheists are among the worst of all human beings, always out to deceive others, and trick people in order to gain converts.

Atheists will try anything to gain converts. They are so desperate and lame.

The simple fact is, I always win, always.

Sources for Religiosity:
– 2005 Eurostat Eurobarometer poll (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf)
– 2008 Gallup poll (http://www.gallup.com/poll/114022/State-States-Importance-Religion.aspx)

Sources for murder rates:
– UNODC crime statistics (http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/Homicide_statistics2012.xls)
– Eurostat crime statistics (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-006/EN/KS-SF-12-006-EN.PDF)

itsnobody #fundie itsnobody.wordpress.com

Knowing my beliefs to be true, flawless, faultless, and without error I encourage people to question, criticize, scrutinize things so that they can see that I am correct.

The main reason why atheists intentionally disallow free and open criticism of their arguments is specifically because they are anti-science fanatics and know that their arguments and beliefs are wrong and false, so they ban and block anyone from questioning, criticizing, or scrutinizing their arguments. If a statement is true then it will stand up to any amount of criticism, so why do atheists intentionally prevent criticism for?

Since I know my statements are true I intentionally encourage criticism.

Atheistic arguments are so laughable and weak, I don’t know how anyone can seriously take atheistic arguments seriously. If atheists really take their arguments seriously then they must be foolish, idiotic, senseless, or not understand anything about logic or science.

There simply is no such thing as a logical atheistic argument.