Mr. Coulter #sexist #homophobia

Mr. Coulter #sexist #homophobia godorscience.com

As I stated, as they eliminate the biological aspect-they being pro-homo and "convinced" it is a hereditary or biological trait- it leaves wide open the environment as being a FACTOR and not soley the reason. Who said over-mothering was the culprit? Why not an immasculating woman? Preferably the type of woman who bought into the 60s/70s womens lib(lib means liberal) movement. It is gonna reveal that the very perfect liberal woman is the leading FACTOR in boys becoming queer. They are already realizing it and setting up the WOMB as being the fault and not the WOMBman, most assuredly the liberal woman. Hatred for the fetus, setting up hatred for the womb, which is the biological problem with homosexuality. I suppose the cure will be to encourage women to get historectomies which will thus encourage more homosexuality which will then make homosexuality mainstream/de-stigmatized. The United States of homos, boy if we arent popular as a nation now, just wait until that dream is realized. WE will be the envy of the entire w
o
r
l
d

41 comments

old comment by Nezu Chiza

Okay...in the first sentence he complains about "them" eliminating the biological aspect of homosexuality, then complains that "they" are convinced it's a hereditary or biological trait. I'm confused as to how he can contradict himself in the same SENTENCE like that.
Moving on, I believe he meant "emasculating", not "immasculating", that's the only way what he says works...but I don't understand how he can think just because a woman has power, a man LOSES power. And how that makes the man gay I'll never understand. Continuing, if he believes that being gay is a biological cause(as he stated in the first sentence), then how can it be caused by a liberal woman? What about men who grow up with the sort of braindead woman he seems to prefer, but who STILL are gay? And finally, why would people encourage women to get histerectomies? Even the most ardent, militent Women's Libber doesn't go out and do THAT. Frankly, I think Mr. Coulter needs to go back to whatever world he thinks these things happens in and leave everyone else alone.

old comment by Adrian

"As I stated, as they eliminate the biological aspect-they being pro-homo and "convinced" it is a hereditary or biological trait- it leaves wide open the environment as being a FACTOR and not soley the reason.
The beginning of the sentence seems broken, but basically he seems to be saying that even if homosexuality is biological there must be an environmental factor too. Who said over-mothering was the culprit? Why not an immasculating woman? Preferably the type of woman who bought into the 60s/70s womens lib(lib means liberal) movement. OK, so after a brief mention of the "Jewish mother" stereotype, he goes after liberated women. Not only is his etymology for women's lib false (and I'm 90% sure he knows it), he seems intent on making them look like ball-cutting feminazi, which is ridiculous. Those are at most a very small (if vocal) minority. They are already realizing it and setting up the WOMB as being the fault and not the WOMBman, most assuredly the liberal woman. Scientifical fact: homosexuals have their brain wired a bit differently from heterosexuals, and this seems to be caused by an in utero excess of oestrogenes for a male foetus; and to a lesser extent by an excess of testosterone for a female one. A few days ago, I stumbled on an article that was mentioning that, statistically, among brothers born of the same mother, the younger one was the higher the chances of being gay. There were speculations about the mother's body percieving male foetus (foeuti?) as foreign and building a quasi-immunitary response over time. I dunno how much of that Coulter Boy here knows (or understands), but his misogynistic and homophobic rant kicks into full speed. The rest of his post just makes no sense....