Steve Kirsch #conspiracy

Steve Kirsch #conspiracy twitter.com

Do you know why there is never a debate on whether vaccines cause autism?

It is because the pro-vaxxers always refuse ANYONE who tries to debate them.

There has never been a debate between experts. Ever.

It's not about me at all. I'm happy not participating. So don't make it about me. That's just gaslighting.

They won't debate anyone who is smart enough to challenge them. Ever.

12 comments

Sigh, there has been debates for almost 150 years now. We “pro-vaxxers” have the same problem as climate scientists with climate change deniers, physicists with geocentrists and flat-earthers, us evolutionary biologists with creationists and the list goes on and on. Your side, like all of these, has no good arguments. Hell, anti-vaxxers still go on and on about that damn Wakefield paper that has been debunked again and again. You are not interested in a true debate, you only want to push your dumb points through. That doesn’t require much intelligence, only the capacity to lie and slander. Which you once again show here.

Because there was a debate, years ago; and you cranks lost. Evidence showed no link.
But of course it's all about you, since you have no actual argument. You just want to play victim for attention.

“Do you know why there is never a debate on whether vaccines cause autism?"
Because the whole anti-vax movement was shown to be a fraud so a guy could increase sales of something he was invested in?
Because only the credulous and those seeking to feel like an insider put any value on the claims?
Because as mentioned above, scientists have learned not to give any attention to scam artists or their victims?
D, All of the Above?

Pro-vaxxers are the experts in the field of medicine. A lawyer no matter how skilled he is (RFK jr)is not an expert on medical fields. At least Andrew Wakeman is a medical doctor who worked on vaccines. He is mad his own vaccine was overlooked for one more effective and has turned on the whole industry out of spite.

There's nothing to debate. Anti-vaxxers only have antedotes while pro-vaccines people have decades of studies saying they work. Anti-vaxxers are just acting in bad faith.

“There was no debate!” Except all those your lot lost.

We don't decide science through debates. We use evidence, and anti-vaxxers have none.

There has never been a debate between experts. Ever.

Could it be that there are no experts on your side?

Don’t wrestle with a pig - you’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.

And I bet that any debate will end with enough materials for a rhetoric course on sophisms and logical fallacies.

Do you know why there is never a debate on whether vaccines cause autism?

For much the same reason I wouldn’t want to play chess with a pigeon.

Vaccines were created - thus exist - way before the likes of Oxford AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer BioNTech, Sputnik-V etc.

Whoops!

Steve Kirsch #conspiracy twitter.com

12 comments

Confused?