You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God. You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that. And the Bible is evidence that there is a God everything within the Bible has been proven to have some sort of backing, for example the Bible is historically accurate with its writings.
65 comments
Gosh, another one of these Jedi mind tricks.
To simply think of something is not to automatically believe something. For example, I didn't automatically think you are an idiot...wait a minute...no, never mind.
You may not believe in Flying Spaghetti Monster, but by denying Flying Spaghetti Monster or accepting that there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster you have already acknowledged the fact that there is Flying Spaghetti Monster.
You can not think of something and choose to deny it...
...your brain will not let you do that.
You forgot that there are still folks (how I envy them) who have not heard about the Bible or God. I suppose that by not thinking about God they acknowledge the fact that there is a God.
"Informative"? I don't think so.
"You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God."
"You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that."
"And the Bible is evidence that there is a God everything within the Bible has been proven to have some sort of backing, for example the Bible is historically accurate with its writings."
"You may not believe in leprechauns, but by denying leprechauns or accepting that there is no leprechaun you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a leprechaun. You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that."
See how stupid it sounds?
You may not believe in Thor, but by denying Thor or accepting that there is no "Thor" you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a "Thor".
So you should have no problem converting to Asatru then.
See what I did there?
If you deny Bigfoot then you acknowledged the fact there is a Bigfoot. If you deny elves then you acknowledged the fact there are elves. If you deny the Loch Ness Monster then you acknowledged the fact there is a Loch Ness Monster. If you deny anal probe-giving aliens then you acknowledged the fact there are anal probe-giving aliens. If you deny unicorns, then you acknowledged the fact that there are unicorns. If you deny Zeus, then you acknowledge the fact that there is a Zeus. If you deny fairies...
"...for example the Bible is historically accurate with its writings."
- So Jesus died after the first day of Passover, as the synoptic gospels say, and before the Passover, as John says? Strange, I know of no Christian sect which teaches that Jesus died twice. Still, it must be so if the bible is historically accurate with its writings.
Don't argue the bible with people who have actually read it. It just makes you look stupid.
Do you need special training to attain that level of educational foresight or are some people just lucky to be born that way?
By the way Informative2016, I'd like to tell you all about Lord Athe who I expect you don't believe in. Oops! Sorry, me and my big mouth.
You may belie ve in God, but by denying the non existence of God or accepting that there is a God you have already acknowledged the fact that there isn't a God. You can not think of something and choose to belie ve it, your brain will not let you do that. And the Bible isn't evidence that there is a God; everything within the Bible hasn't been Peer Reviewed, to have some sort of backing, for example: the Bible isn't historically accurate with its writings. Example: According to Ezekiel, Tyre was erased from the map. There's 174,000 people today who would like a word with you, re. the [i]non[/i]existence of the city they're currently residing in, right now, 8th November 2013 [i]AD[/i].
...now you see how it works? Certainly Argument Annihilation: take the fundies own 'logic' and reverse such, to expose the absurdity of blind faith.
A rainbow doesn't actually physically exist, but at least we can see it, nay explain and easily replicate such. That isn't absurd, but fact . Reality.
And when a book of fairytales - the Bible - claims that a talking snake existed, it must be historically accurate, as per your own words , amirite, so as per said 'historically accurate Scripture, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (KJV), you are forced to prove that a reptile with human speech ability existed; and as all things were created by God, they must still exist to this day. So go ahead, find for me a talking snake, or admit that your Bible is lies from start to finish; and it must be literal throughout - cover-to-cover - otherwise again, it's ALL lies.
"You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God."
For some reason, this logic only seems to work with your god. Why is that? Or are you saying that you believe in all the gods ever dreamed up by man?
"for example the Bible is historically accurate with its writings"
You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God. You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that.
Lemme try something: "There are no aliens with giant schlongs trying to have butt sex with fundies." Uh oh. You'd better watch out because now those aliens exist! Worst yet, you denying it only makes them more real >:)
You may beleive in god, but by denying atheism or accepting god you have already acknowledged the fact that there is no god. You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that.
"And the Bible is evidence that there is a God everything within the Bible has been proven to have some sort of backing, for example the Bible is historically accurate with its writings."
The Koran has never been proven false in spite of millions of god-hating infidels desperately trying. Leave your false cult and submit to Allah.
If the Bible is evidence god exists, why does it make him look like an asshole and not worthy of worship? Why is it used to justify hatred of unbelievers and homosexuals? And in your whole post, that was the least of your fails
Great, that must mean that the Flying Spaghetti Monster does exist. The fact that there are fewer pirates and more global warming is evidence that there is a FSM.
You haven't actually read that Bible of yours, have you dearie? It even contradicts itself in the very first two chapters. But, the Song of Songs has its merits, though; it's probably my favorite part. Too bad I was taught the Christmas Gospel by heart in school, and not that one...
So, all plants don't require photosynthesis?
Listen, if I can find an error on the very first fucking page of your book, chances are the rest of the book is shit.
Ok my logic circuits are over flowing with errors from reading this. I think I'd actually explode from the logic bomb this guy tries to drop if I didn't have those crumple zones.
"You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God. "
No...no no no no NO! Brains and logic do not work that way!
You may not believe in Smurfs, but by denying Smurfs or accepting that there are no Smurfs you have already acknowledged the fact that there are Smurfs.
PS When I say Smurfs I don't mean methheads that steal over the counter cold medicine.
By that reasoning, anything I can think of must therefore be real: unicorns, a ring of giant meatballs in orbit around Neptune, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, a hollow moon filled with slime creatures, a race of tiny people inhabiting my trash compactor ...
"You may not believe in [the monsters in the closet], but by denying [the monsters in the closet]or accepting that there [are no monsters in the closet] you have already acknowledged the fact that there [are no monsters in the closet].
So tell me, how pointy are their horns and how sharp are their claws?
"You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that."
Have fun believing in Superman, Harry Potter, and the Flying Spaghetti Monster, because by that logic, your knowledge of all of them means that you must believe they exist.
Seriously. That must be the most transparently unexamined statement I've heard in a long time.
> You may not believe in God, but by denying God or accepting that there is no God you have already acknowledged the fact that there is a God.
~P -> P ?
When your argument is a contradiction, it's probably wrong.
So shape-shifting aliens, unicorns, faeries, mermaids, leprechauns, and psychic powers are real. Yay!
You can apply this excrutiatingly bad attemnpt at logic to unicorns, Odin, a 4.6 billion year old Earth, orbiting teapots in space, and Santa Claus.
You didn't think it through too well, did you? Not to mention that we've seen shit like this before, so your pile of crap isn't even remotely original.
Indeed, it was the onthological argument, that was refuted by a religious man, nonetheless. St Thomas of Aquinas, in case you're wondering. The reason is obvious. That you can think that something exists, it doesn't mean it exists. Can you think of a million dollars in your account?, are there?
Congratulations, you've just admitted to believing in literally everything the human imagination has ever conceived.
What will you do for your next trick?
You may not believe in Twilight Sparkle but by denying Twilight Sparkle or accepting that there is no Twilight Sparkle you have already acknoledged that there is a Twillight Sparkle. You can not think of something and choose to deny it, your brain will not let you do that. And My Little Pony Friendship is Magic is evidence that there is a Twilight Sparkle, for example your own bible says there are unicorns.
Yes I know she is an alicorn now :)
@#1604435
And as there are also Dragons in the Bible, therefore...:
image
X3
...and as for Twi being an Alicorn and effectively a God , such as Princesses Celestia & Luna , unlike those on 4chan's /mlp/ who got their knickers in a knot about the end of the 3rd Series ('Oh, it'll change the character dynamics!' BS & so on) the fact she has also wings makes her still nonetheless Best Pony.
And of course, as Twi is now a God, a la Celestia & Luna, ergo Argument Over. >:D
So Hinawa and Flint eist?!
And where are the Mane Six?
Fucking idiotic stupid Christians...
@#1604520
"So Hinawa and Flint eist?!
And where are the Mane Six?
Fucking idiotic stupid Christians..."
I read that first name as M inawa, the cyborg counterpart to V1046R Mahoro (a.k.a. Mahoro Andou) in "Mahoromatic" X3
"@#1605389
"@1604520
"According to Informative2016's "logic" Hinawa and Flint have teamed up with The Mane Six to stop Species 8472 and The Umbrella Corp. from invading Hogwarts"
I am now imagining the ultimate crossover: M inawa & James Coburn's super-spy defending Harry Potter's school from attacks via Bioships & Zombies; also with the help of Pinkie Pie, Fluttershy, Applejack, Rainbow Dash, Rarity & Alicorn Twilight Sparkle armed with their Elements of Harmony.
Now that'd be quite a crackfic in Fanfiction.net! X3 /)^3^(\
Aw, fuck, guys! I just thought of Cthulhu, and then I tried to deny Cthulhu existed, but my fucking brain wouldn't let me do that! So now, Cthulhu DOES exist and he's going to eat every fucking one of us! Sorry ...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
