bolobaby #wingnut #homophobia

bolobaby #wingnut #homophobia freerepublic.com

Here’s the best part about the leftists - their bald-faced hypocrisy!

They seek to normalize all things homosexual, but they are they willingly use “teabagging” as a pejorative. They also LOVE to vilify any Republican who gets caught in a homosexual act (see Craig, Foley, et al). They very quickly use the fact that the Republican showed homosexual tendencies as a slight.

If only these guys owned mirrors!

54 comments

old comment by Zeus Almighty

We also love it when people like David Vitter, Mark Sanford, Sen. Ensign, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giulliani get caught being heterosexual hypocrites.
You see, Sparky, when you claim to be the party of "family values," it's kind of expected that you people actually have, well, you know, values. And morals.
But every time one of your kind gets caught with his willy in a man or woman who's not his wife, your only reaction is to bleat "BILL CLINTON" over and fucking over. Meanwhile your Retardlican elected officials are laughing at you because they think of their voters in the same way that P.T. Barnum thought of the clueless rubes who visited his freak show.

old comment by

@DaaanceYouLoser

"Well, he raises a very good point."
No, he doesn't. He completely misses the point.

"If there is truly nothing wrong with homosexuality in the eyes of the Leftist, then do not make a big deal when someone turns out to be homosexual."
Because these Republicans are hypocrites. There really isn't anything wrong with homosexuality, but what we "Leftists" are laughing at is that people like Ted Haggard who said homosexuals should be put to death was caught with a gay, meth-head prostitute. Senator Larry Craig actually had the gall to vote for a Constitutional ban on same-sex marriage a couple of years before he was caught with his pants down in a restroom. That's called hypocrisy, and that's why we mock them, not because they're simply gay. They railed against homosexuals so much and treated homosexuality like the worst crime a person could commit, but then they were caught in the act with other men. Family values my ass.

"One can of course act against something he himself has been involved in. Just because one has done it, doesn't mean he must think it is right."
That is such a weak defense of hypocrisy.

old comment by GigaGuess

They seek to normalize all things homosexual...
No, just to have us left to live our lives as we see fit, provided no one is harmed (and no, your precious feelings don't count here.)

...but they are they willingly use “teabagging” as a pejorative.
No, we just laugh our asses off as the teabaggers chose the moniker without realizing what it meant.

They also LOVE to vilify any Republican who gets caught in a homosexual act (see Craig, Foley, et al).
Funny you should bring this up while calling us hypocrites. See, when you scream about how evil a group is, and how they deserve nothing but death, flailing the finger of judgment everywhere but at themselves, and then they get caught with their proverbial...and in some cases, literal pants down, then yeah, we will point out the hypocrisy of their sanctimonious rants, spewing hellfire and brimstone out of one side of their mouth, and sucking a nice fat cock with the other. What I'm saying here is...don't talk the talk, unless you're willing to walk the walk.

They very quickly use the fact that the Republican showed homosexual tendencies as a slight.
What? No, we point out that the guys screeching about the evils of homosexuality are, at least with reasonable consistency, trying to throw attention away from themselves. Further, if we use it for anything, we use it to point out the harm that the Haggards and others like him do, while blithely disregarding their own condemnations. People commit suicide over the shit they scream about, and yet, for some reason, God's ire will never be on THEIR doors. So yes, when they get caught as they hypocrites they are, we will point. And we will yell. And we will make sure the world sees them as the charlatans they are.

old comment by Shann

They seek to normalize all things homosexual

The burden of proving that homosexuality is abnormal is on you, not the homosexual, for whom it is a completely natural and normal state of being.

Here's a little exercise: try making a well thought out, reasonable argument against homosexuality WITHOUT throwing religion in it. I bet you can't.

The only objection you fuckers have to it is because you mistakenly think it conflicts with your religious beliefs. Other than that, you have NOTHING.

Oh, and for the record, hypocritical pieces of shit who openly condemn gay behavior while covertly indulging in it themselves fucking deserve to be vilified. The same goes for shitwits like you, bolobaby, who are too stupid to understand why.

old comment by

@ #1088338:

"...what we "Leftists" are laughing at is that people like Ted Haggard who said homosexuals should be put to death was caught with a gay, meth-head prostitute."

Well as soon as someone says that people should be put to death for what they believe or feel in their hearts, you know that person has some fucking problems.

"Senator Larry Craig actually had the gall to vote for a Constitutional ban on same-sex marriage a couple of years before he was caught with his pants down in a restroom. That's called hypocrisy, and that's why we mock them, not because they're simply gay."

Actually, that's in no way hypocrisy. He didn't try to marry a homosexual, he just banged one. Someone who bangs a gay man is not necessarily supportive of gay marriage, and has no rational obligation to be -- gay marriage factually makes no sense. There is no reason for homosexuals to adopt a religious practise just so they can leech off the benefits of a religious society. They can simply settle for a contract that has nothing to do with marriage. Yet, even a large percentage of homosexuals see this obvious point and don't support gay marriage. In fact none of the homosexuals I know over the age of thirty support gay marriage... yet they still bang each other.

"They railed against homosexuals so much and treated homosexuality like the worst crime a person could commit..."

Obviously an exaggeration. No-one on the face of the Earth considers homosexuality the worst crime a person could commit.

Edit: Sorry, this has been DaaanceYouLoser, forgot to fill in the designated name field.

old comment by Caretaker

@ DaaanceYouLoser

I know this isn't the best way to enter into a debate, but I really have to point out that you're repeating 'banging [gay men]' a lot. Seriously, try and be a little more oblique; this apparent fixation is kind of creepy. 'Sleeps with', for example, is less homophobic-sounding.

Meanwhile, your pedantic view of these politicians' histories isn't a reasonable argument. You claim that as Craig was against gay marriage, he's not a hypocrite for sleeping with a gay man. But y'see, a quick google would have informed you that Craig wasn't just against gay marriage;

Craig voted against cloture in 2002, which would have extended the federal definition of hate crimes to cover sexual orientation. This legislation was passed in 2007 in both the House and the Senate as the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007.

And check out this page to see how he tried to lie about his guilt; he was innocent, of course! And then it blandly points out that audio was released of him bitterly claiming that it was entrapment - not a misunderstanding or outright fraud, entrapment. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the term.

He's politically come out against homosexuality (excuse the pun) several times in his career, only to be caught in a homosexual act himself, which he then openly lied about and used campaign funds to pay the legal costs of. If you can't see the hypocrisy of that, of using his votes to try and obstruct constitutional rights to a minority which he, in fact, secretly belonged to, then you're being willfully ignorant, and nobody here can help you with that.

I don't care what part of the political spectrum you're in - I'm not even in the US, incidentally - but deliberately overlooking the obvious and thus remaining in denial about the very definition of 'hypocrisy' is pretty damned stupid. I truly don't believe you when you say "none of the homosexuals I know", because from your conduct here, I can't envisage any openly gay men or women speaking to you on the matter of gay rights. You won't even address liberals properly - Leftist? What next, 'pinko'? Your extreme lack of respect in merely your casual language signals that you have, at the very least, latent prejudice towards people different from you. At most, I detect a faint whiff of homophobia...

Hey, we all know Ted Haggard was a homophobe, don't we? Gee, whatever happened to him...?

old comment by DaaanceYouLoser

@ Caretaker

"I know this isn't the best way to enter into a debate, but I really have to point out that you're repeating 'banging [gay men]' a lot. Seriously, try and be a little more oblique; this apparent fixation is kind of creepy. 'Sleeps with', for example, is less homophobic-sounding."

Hm. You're asking me for more variety in the expressions I use to represent gay sex, and I'm the one with a fixation?

"Meanwhile, your pedantic view of these politicians' histories isn't a reasonable argument. You claim that as Craig was against gay marriage, he's not a hypocrite for sleeping with a gay man. But y'see, a quick google would have informed you that Craig wasn't just against gay marriage;

Um, and? You basically just said, an apple isn't a pear, it's a banana. In no way does voting against an extension of the extremely ridiculous legal concept of "illegal hate crimes" (hate is an emotion, therefore a hate crime is essentially a thought crime) contradict committing homosexual acts. For example I am a white person; am I a hypocrite because I do not support the legal recognition of "hate crimes" towards white people? No. I'm just sensible.

"And check out this page to see how he tried to lie about his guilt; he was innocent, of course! And then it blandly points out that audio was released of him bitterly claiming that it was entrapment - not a misunderstanding or outright fraud, entrapment. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the term."

Fine, a politician lied. Ya got me there. How terrible for a politician to lie like that.

"He's politically come out against homosexuality (excuse the pun) several times in his career, only to be caught in a homosexual act himself, which he then openly lied about and used campaign funds to pay the legal costs of. If you can't see the hypocrisy of that, of using his votes to try and obstruct constitutional rights to a minority which he, in fact, secretly belonged to, then you're being willfully ignorant, and nobody here can help you with that."

Obstruct constitutional rights...? Do tell. I'm also quite certain that he wasn't "against homosexuality." That's like being against blondes.

"I don't care what part of the political spectrum you're in - I'm not even in the US, incidentally - but deliberately overlooking the obvious and thus remaining in denial about the very definition of 'hypocrisy' is pretty damned stupid."

I've never been to the US. I don't even know who any of these people are, I'm a troll that's very good at playing devil's advocate.

"I truly don't believe you when you say "none of the homosexuals I know", because from your conduct here, I can't envisage any openly gay men or women speaking to you on the matter of gay rights. You won't even address liberals properly - Leftist? What next, 'pinko'? Your extreme lack of respect in merely your casual language signals that you have, at the very least, latent prejudice towards people different from you. At most, I detect a faint whiff of homophobia...""

Well thank you for that giant list of baseless assumptions, it's really significant to me. Firstly, there is nothing incorrect about the term "Leftist." Second, well, when you live where I do you would have to refrain from ever leaving home if you don't want to socialise with homosexuals, and I have at least a dozen familiar friends who are of the variety. But it's also a very classy society and the majority is very moderate. You are right, though, that I have an extreme lack of respect for things I don't like, so I'm glad you caught on to that. If had homophobia I would certainly not be able to openly discuss homosexuality, I'd be too afraid; I have arachnophobia, for example, and to even talk about spiders makes me tremble a little. Not so about homos. Gays, gays, gays, gays, gays, big ole fudgepackin' gays. Nope, nothing.

"Hey, we all know Ted Haggard was a homophobe, don't we? Gee, whatever happened to him...?"

Um.. I don't know. According to Wikipedia he got married and had a boat-load of kids.