For the fifth time — there are zero transisitonal fossils that demonstrate macroevolution. And a hamster buried underneath your grandpa doesnt mean the hamster is related to him. Thats imagination and sleight of hand. Evolution exists only in the mind.
39 comments
And a hamster buried underneath your grandpa doesnt mean the hamster is related to him.
No, but it probably means the hamster was buried first, unless you think somebody dug grandpa up and buried a hamster under him.
Microevolution over time equals macroevolution.
Each and every fossil is to some extent transitional.
On a grander scale; yes, gramps and Fussy are related, as they are both mammals.
The page spends its entirety trying to prove that Evolution never happened..but yet accepts that "micro" evolution happens.
And they wonder why we laugh at them.
"In no way does the idea of particles-to-people evolution meet the long-accepted criteria of a scientific theory. "
Right..because DNA is NOT made from Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen. That would be proof that life comes from lifeless materials. In reality DNA is made from "information" that proves without a doubt that god was born 2000 years ago and crucified! Praise Jesus.
"Even doctrinaire-atheistic evolutionist Richard Dawkins admits that atheism cannot be proved to be true."
umm...no he didnt. He would never say something so elementary and untrue. Richard Dawkins IS an atheist. Therefore, atheism exists. Atheism does not require wether a deity exist or not..only that one does not believe.
"For the fifth time
there are zero transisitonal fossils that demonstrate macroevolution."
Yes there are. You're either ignorant or a liar, which is it?
"Evolution exists only in the mind. "
No, evolution is a fact of nature.
Go to damn museum some time, like the Museum of natural History if you ever have the chance. They have a whole FLOOR dedicated to fossils and skeletons, and you can see there are transitional fossils. You can freaking compare to LIFE SIZE MODELS OF EXTINCT ANIMALS to living ones, for goodness' sake.
No, but a hamster buried under your grandpa indicates that the HAMSTER WAS IN THE GROUND FIRST.
And for the nth time, there are AN ABUNDANCE of transitional fossils that demonstrate macroevolution.
My question is what was Grandpa doing with that hamster in the first place?
And no, there are no half man/half monkey or half dog/half cat fossils because such things don't exist. Nor does the ToE say that they should. And using the term macroevolution is a total fail, because if you're going to admit that "microevolution" occurs, then you just admitted that evolution occurs.
evolution might be subtle, but it's so simple as to be obvious once you understand it. of course there aren't crocoducks. one species doesn't suddenly pop out a new one. chimps and people arose from the same species of animal. one individual of the species became chimps and one became humans. why would you expect anything else? besides, if you want a transitional phase, how about the gradation from reptiles to mammal-like reptiles to monotremes to mammals? reluctance to accept evolution almost seems at times like being blinded by the obvious. it's almost TOO simple in some ways.
Evolution exists only in the mind.
Wow! It said something that is perfectly right, from a linguistic perspective!
However accidentally I suppose and not with the intention a linguist/phenomenologist would use to analyze this statement.
BTW:
Does anyone here think these guys would even bother to TRY to understand evolution in order to rescue their own life or their family??
And a hamster buried underneath your grandpa doesnt mean the hamster is related to him.
No, but the fact that grandpa and the hamster share many similarities like bone structure, internal organs, sensory organs, hair/pelt and even DNA shows that they are (albeit distantly) related.
Macro evolution happens on a grander scale, stupid; it takes hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, of years. You have to line the fossils up in chronological order to see the change over time.
Dogs are evolving away from wolves, but dogs are still part of the wolf species. In a few hundred thousand years they might have speciated, or we might have pushed wolves to extinction.
Your "understanding" of the TOE is imagination and sleight of hand.
And
If a creature drastically changed from one generation to the next (by y'know MAGIC!) it would be seen scientifically as not even the same species, but this doesn't happen because thats not what Macroevolution is.
As already stated it's a linear change over MANY generations.
"And a hamster buried underneath your grandpa doesnt mean the hamster is related to him. "
Besides you, who exactly is saying it is?
You can't see macro evolution in one transitional fossil, stupid; you need hundreds, maybe thousands, to follow the evolution from micro to macro.
A hamster buried underneath a human means that the hamster probably died first, or that there were an earthquake.
Oh, and even IF you could disprove evolution, that would only disprove evolution.
You would then still need to prove that YOUR specific version of YOUR specific god and YOUR specific creation myth are true.
Disproving evolution does not automatically make any specific fairy-tale true.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.