[after his relentless anti-evolution campaign, AV1611VET declares war on math]
Again: I do not have a problem with circular logic - none.
2 + 5 = 7 because 7 = 2 + 5.
79 comments
That isn't cicular logic. Circular logic is
What is statistics?
Statistics are stastical information.
You used a mathematical property.
Well, whaddya know? AV found the calculator in Windows. No matter, his methods are erroneous and he still fails to comprehend circular reasoning.
We really need a Fundie Hall Of Shame, just for this asshat.
Si, AV1611VET es muy estupido en cualesquiera idioma.
I hope that means what I want it to mean, my Spanish is pretty bad.
lets see;2 + 5 = 7 because 7 = 2 + 5.
If I do an FFT on the equation, not the Fast Fourier Transform but the Fundi Fundamentalist Transform I can now write the equation as:
FFT [(2 + 5 = 7 because 7 = 2 + 5)]
= God wrote the Bable (because) the Bable says God wrote it.
A tortureology.
fundamentalists delenda est
THE STUPID!!!
IT BURNS!!!!!!!!
Hey AV:
How do you keep your head from imploding when there's a vacuum where your brain should be? I need to know asap, because every time I read one of your quotes, more of my little gray cells become bereft of life.
Gee. He can do tautological algebra. He's a fuckin' genius, I tell ya... why, you have to have at least room temperature IQ to pull that one off...
/me gives up the sarcastic deadpan as almost as lame as AV1611VET
Good God, does anybody realise how much money we could make by setting AV1611VET up as a sideshow attraction?
"Step right up sir, take a peek at the world through the AV lens! A five minute conversation with this gent and you'll never take your cognitive faculties for granted again!"
Bash him all you want, AV will NEVER give up:
"
I knew someone was gonna do this, but I thought they were gonna come back with 4 +3.
Anyway, I made my point:
2 + 5 = 7 and 7 = 2 + 5
No matter how much you can reword it.
"
Even though everything in his post is technically correct. AV1611VET still manages to miss his intended target by a mile.
How this person continues to snatch fail from the jaws of win every single time simply amazes me.
No, Smith, there are glaring technical errors in his post. He's claimed that the equivalence property of '=' (specifically the symmetry) is the same as "p => p, therefore p".
There's been enough said about AV. Instead, I'll be a Maths dick and point out that while 2+5 can only equal 7, seven, however, can be a sum of:
1+6
2+5
3+4
0+7
If you really want to be a maths Nazi, you can also use negative integers (-1+8, etc..). AV fails @ teh mafz.
Actually, 2+5=7 because:
2+5=5+2 (commutativity)
5+2=5+s(1) (because 2 is the successor of 1, we write: 2=s(1) )
5+s(1)=s(5+1) (by the definition of addition under set theory)
s(5+1)=s(5+s(0))=s(s(5+0)) (because 1=s(0) )
s(s(5+0)=s(s(5)) (because a+0=a )
s(s(5))=s(6) (because s(5)=6 )
s(6)=7 (because s(6)=7 )
"Again: I do not have a problem with circular logic - none.
2 + 5 = 7 because 7 = 2 + 5."
And Pi = exactly 3, because your so-called Bible says so:
image
[/hyper-sarcasm]
Now build me a wheel, based on that circular logic AV1611VET. If you can, then even you will have beaten your own 'God' at his own omnipotence game.
It's okay, I can wait...!
You know, this example is faulty because it's not completely circular.
While 7=2+5, there are other answers that could make that true.
7=3+4
7=2+5
7=1+6
7=8-1
7=10-3
7=21/3
And possibly an infinite number more. The logic becomes more of a never ending spiral than a circle.
And I'm not even very good at math!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.