Science will never find the answer to all those difficult questions. They will continue to work on various theories as long as God is left out of the equation and this is all to easy to do as God cannot be tested or demonstrated in a lab. This is, incidentally, why Evolution should be banished from Science and taught as a religion. If this were the case nobody would follow it as it Godless for one reason and has totally bogus claims. The problem is that the majority of people out there will believe these so called Scientists is due to the fact that they are in an authorotative position. I cannot accept that 3 billion years ago life emerged and I cannot accept that we progressed to eventually become beautiful us, it is all to vague and unfamilliar with no valid proof. I have requested countless times that somebody explain MACRO-Evolution to me but alas, nobody can do it, I keep hearing about micro-evolution which I ABSOLUTELY AGREE WITH!! Thank you to all those who've tried in convincing me once again that Macro -evolution is an absolute hoax.
37 comments
I cannot accept that 3 billion years ago life emerged and I cannot accept that we progressed to eventually become beautiful us No one cares that you can't accept it. Your inability to accept science has no bearing on whether it's true or not.
So very much wrong.
Evolution, a science, should be taught as a religion. But since there is no god involved, no one will follow it.
Ow. Me head hurt now.
image
Even if Scientists believe in God, and most of them in one way or another do, God is always out of a mathematical operation like ECUATION, algebra, you know, because it´s impossible to proof its existence scientifically. It´s a matter of faith and a book written by nomads 3000 years ago is not going to solve any ecuation. Including how on earth you use this computer or live up to 70.
"..as God cannot be tested or demonstrated in a lab."
CORRECT! There is hope for you.
"This is, incidentally why Evolution should be banished from Science and taught as a religion."
Then again, maybe not.
So close, yet so far.
Science will never find the answer to all those difficult questions
A little overconfident, methinks. "Never" is a long time.
The problem is that the majority of people out there will believe these so called Scientists is due to the fact that they are in an authorotative position.
You know, there's a very good reason they're in that position and religious nuts like yourself aren't - the scientific method works and gets results, while yours does not.
I think I see the problem here:
I have requested countless times that somebody explain MACRO-Evolution to me but alas, nobody can do it...
Then perhaps, just perhaps, the problem isn't with the people doing the explaining, eh?
I have requested countless times that somebody explain MACRO-Evolution to me but alas, nobody can do it, I keep hearing about micro-evolution which I ABSOLUTELY AGREE WITH
Integrate with respect to t.
I have requested countless times that somebody explain MACRO-Evolution to me but alas, nobody can do it, I keep hearing about micro-evolution which I ABSOLUTELY AGREE WITH!! Thank you to all those who've tried in convincing me once again that Macro -evolution is an absolute hoax."
Just because your idiotic mind cannot process a very simple scientific definition , it does not mean that macro-evolution "is an absolute hoax."
Here's an an analogy that you might be able to comprehend:
You start out with one very small piece of turd , i.e. A belief in a divine creator that cannot be proven, just because it says so in a book that you found in the desert. From there, you progress to making small changes in your life to please this god (e.g. not eating meat on Fridays.)[micro-evolution]. These small changes then begin to pile up to form one of the largest mountains of turds you've ever seen: Your religion and its cult-followers![macro-evolution at last!]
Do you understand now? No? Well you're a macro-idiot!
Niali:There's that word again: beautiful. Again, I'm compelled to wonder if the resistance to evolution all boils down to "apes are ugly.
Hell yeah - if you really want to crush that argument once and for all, break out the theory of "Irreducible Grotesqueness"!
Niali: Nah, it's just plain arrogance: "I'm too good to be descended from a monkey!"
I once saw an incredibly insulting, condescending and smug button which said: "Poor you, being descended from apes. All of MY ancestors were human from the start." Wrong again, oh ape of stupid brain! Your first ancestor, according to your oh-so-holy myth, was a pile of dirt. This makes you better than us lowly ape-descendants how?
Stuck-up assholes, the lot of them.
One step: || = "micro" evolution.
One step after another after another after another: || = "macro" evolution.
Now there, that wasn't hard. Don't cry.
All evidence is included in the equation. As there is no evidence for any gods, goddesses or other deities, they are left out. If you have evidence, feel free to present it.
Evolution should be banished from science as it CAN be tested and demonstrated? That doesn't make sense.
image
There are literally mountains of valid evidence in favor of evolution. Gods; not so much...
You're not a good listener, are you, dearie? Macro is just a whole lot of micro; there's no difference, only more of the same. Dogs are about to speciate away from the wolf; any century now.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.