image
No tolerance for cucks!
20 comments
@Malingspann : An imagined utopian paradise run according to the principles of Anarcho-capitalism, if I'm parsing this right. Of course, in reality, anarcho-anything tends not to work very well, but just try to tell the True Believers that.
@Psalmanazaar
Many neomisogynists seem to take a "Might Makes Right" approach to fidelity - we see those made explicit in many ramblings of Jim and caamib. According to them, the authority over a female's sexuality belongs to her male owner (husband/patriarch with girls/unmarried women). If a female is unattached, or if her owner is not strong and/or controlling enough, any man is free to do whatever he wants to her. For this reason, they hold "sluts" and "cucks" in hateful contempt, but admire, indeed, want to become, skirtchasers and rapists even when going after taken women, since Chad is Das Ubermensh and the inferior betas deserve to have their women taken from them because they are too weak and submissive to defend him.
In other words, they are utterly depraved monster who know that no woman will ever love them and want to leave them with no choice but to marry them.
Cute, they made their imaginary land and even named it as well! Don`t ya worry, nobody with a shred of socialist beliefs is going to come near your fantasy republic(or is it even a republic), you can only enter it through the imagination(of a bitter old plutocrat)!
This "V" logo reminds me of "Nineteen Eighty-Four", as the logo of the party. Ingsoc.
Freedom is slavery!
War is peace!
Ignorance is strength!
The ugly photoshopping makes her look like she has orange skin. Ironic.
Seriously, even I can photoshop better than this! Come on, ancaps.
Also I second @Mephistopheles' remark about the logo looking like the INGSOC emblem. Except ancap is in the polar opposite direction on the political spectrum.
Slightly off-topic: I have a friend who deeply believes in anarcho-syndicalism. We get along well but I cannot for the life of me understand his worldview. We had several arguments on how an anarcho-syndicalist society bigger than a couple hundred people could possibly function, and my memory is that his proposed solution (in a nutshell, a computerized debate/voting system) would likely degenerate into a technocracy in very short order.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.