I guess someone's sorry he was triggered by someone taking Chavspeak and satirising it, Uilleam. His fee-fees are hurt at having no concept of that, or Parody; his inability to recognise these concepts.
But that's all right. Otherwise he wouldn't have replied the way he did. Or he did because he's filling the vacuum left by shitstirrer TimeToTurd, a.k.a. proven shitstirrer Dynastia, from Kiwi Farms.
Because it's not as if he's been doing the same as Dynastia/TTT: only the other way, politically. Especially against anyone who would dare criticise what's in the White House right now.
Again: someone has no concept of Satire. Or Parody. Or the use of such against someone just as membrane-skinned.
Did the previous president act the same way: in public, online or on TV etc...? His feelings weren't 'hurt', so what's his 'replacement's excuse? Or of his boyfriends...?!
When it comes to Satire: "SNL", "Have I Got News For You", "Private Eye" magazine, and sites such as The Onion/B3ta.com/FSTDT, there are no 'Safe Spaces'.
Don't like criticism of what's in the White House right now, either ignore it, or find that 'Safe Space'.
Because all that what's in the White House has to do - to ensure that nobody has the right to criticise them about anything: to never do anything wrong in word, action & thought to warrant any criticism, and thus eliminate the use of satire & parody against them - is to [i]change[/i].
Hey, you'd be surprised how much old people can change in their beleifs. [sic]
...see, I used another concept there: sarcasm. [/Doug Piranha]