hasselhoff #fundie

hasselhoff #fundie reddit.com

No! Trump is most definitely not a racist! The comments he's made regarding issues such as Muslim's, the Mexican Wall, and other such things have been skewed by the media to make it seem like he's a racist when in fact he's not! The wall only helps latino's and everybody else in America by stopping illegal drug trafficking, and a prevention on allowing more Muslims(not deporting the ones already here!) will only improve the lives of the current ones and everyone else knowing that the ones that are here aren't terrorist.

45 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"No! Trump is most definitely not a racist!"

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/02/29/donald-trump-georgia-rally-valdosta/81129964/

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/28/politics/donald-trump-white-supremacists/

Oh yes he i-is!

@Creedence Leonore Gielgud

>by stopping illegal drug trafficking,

"People who are the world's foremost experts on tunnelling, are going to be stopped by a wall."

North Korea. Palestine. Vietnam.

But hey, just ask the UK & France, hassled. If Dover & Calais are too far apart to build a road/rail bridge, if the Channel Tunnel can exist - and that pesky English Channel couldn't stop it - by dint of human ingenuity, therefore...!

old comment by brazenTyrant

I'm going to keep saying this until it finally gets through to one of you.
Actually it's even easier to debunk the claim that Trump is racist:
He failed to do anythign about the racists that support him even when they were threatening black people right in front of him. Condoning racism makes you a racist too.
Islam is an ideology, by definition it's impossible to be racist against Islam.
1. It's an ideology associated with a particular ethnic group.
2. Donald Trump's proposed policies aren't warranted by anything that Islam has done, so there must be some other reason why he wants them.
3. If a racist wanted to target Arabs, an easy way to avoid scrutiny would be to claim that they were motivated by religion instead of race.
4. Donald Trump is known to condone racism (see above).
5. Donald Trump's use of terrorism as an excuse for discriminatory behaviour is the exact same excuse that anti-Arabic racists give.
6. Most of the immigrants, refugees, etc. who would be affected by Trump's proposed policies are members of a minority ethnic group.
To sum up: Donald Trump is behaving the same way an anti-Arabic racist would. He is known to condone racism. Therefore, even if he say's he is motivated by ideology instead of race, the evidence says otherwise.

old comment by

@Thinking Allowed

"But insulting followers of Islam is."

That's not racist either. Read a dictionary on what words mean.

"True, but taken into context what Chump has said about Mexicans is. "

Only the wave of illegals. Mexico has 122 million people, only a few million have tried to enter illegally. Please tell me in what world is an attack on a small segment of a population and attack on the ENTIRE population? Learn to logic and stop wasting my time.

Furthermore, and admittedly this is a minor point, Mexican is a nationality, not a race, so the accurate term would be xenophobic, IF it was directed at the Mexican identity as a whole.

However it's not even xenophobia. No country has any obligation to tolerate illegals.

Do it legally or don't do it at all. That's it.

old comment by

@Skidie

"At least make a unified set of rules for everybody to immigrate dipshit."

Everybody? Sorry but immigration isn't a right. Furthermore, immigrants need the US far more than the reverse. Remember that. The burden of proof should be on each immigrant to prove that they will be a positive addition for the US, otherwise, there are already 300 million people in the country.

"Why the fuck do I or say an ukrainian need a visa when a british person can come and go as they please? Why in the hellish fuck make the process such a drag while most of your own citizen would fucking fail it?"

Because Britain and the US are closer economically, culturally and politically than other parts of the world. That's no knock on Ukraine (which is whiter than America by the way), it's just the simple truth.

Christ, this is a really dumb comment. That said, given some of the shit in Britain lately including the way the government itself treats free speech (one guy even got arrested merely for quoting Churchill) and how a significant portion of the population actually thinks a presidential front runner should be banned from the country (yeah that's going to improve diplomatic relationships if he actually wins), I think maybe the US should re-introduce visas for everyone non-US.

Anyway, none of this is any excuse for illegal immigration anymore than Elliot Rodger not getting pussy is an excuse for rape. If you think the standards are too high, though shit. Change your own country to be more like the US then. The blueprint is there.

old comment by Skidie

@1920245:

This is one of the more retarded comments I`ve read for some time. You fucks NEED immigration way more than we need US, else good luck getting your specialists and replacement workforce without it. Also nice betrayal of your ancestors beliefs there clown, all those who came to your shores on the ramshackle boats in the early 1900 with no visas, you know like yours probably did. Hypocrisy doesn`t hurt, sadly. As for your last comment, watch out if the Drumpf wins he`s gonna change your country to look a lot more like mine...

@Hasan Prishtina:

This is a bit different since Canada and Britain are both part of their own commonwealth where one of their passports effectively gives you a right to live in any other. Still it`s an "is", not "ought", and it is a human right to chose your home country, as much as some idiots might be speaking against it. We are not bound to the ground where we`re born on and to it`s culture if we find it lacking.

old comment by

@Skidie

LOL! I find it funny when people wail against the US. Europe would have been Hitler's bitch without the US help, nevermind that the US helped rebuild European countries after the war and helped keep the commies from expanding further than they did.

Even if you beat Hitler, you'd still be Moscow's bitch anyway LOL

Also, the US pretty much has to spend an insane amount on military because its "allies" don't spend enough. I wonder how well NATO would do if you took the US out of the equation... Hmmm.

Oh did I mention Korea? That fat kid would wipe the floor with South Korea without US troops to help. Enjoy your air diet if the US ever withdraws LOL

old comment by Azereaux

@#1920431

Reading comprehension and Geography 101:

Texas (where I said I am proudly from [born and raised]) is a state in the southern United States, with the distinction of having been (however briefly) its own nation after a successful rebellion against Mexico (perpetrated by what amounted to Americans that didn't want to be in America and Mexicans that didn't want to be in Mexico [aka pretty much what we have now besides our sizeable population of Vietnamese expats and their descendants]).

In other words, Texas is not part of Western Europe.

Further, you completely missed the point of my post, namely that the ability to slog through half of Europe does not equal the ability to slog through the rest, especially after having suffered the highest casualties of any nation participating in the war. Which would have been worse without a strong western front to keep the Nazis half-occupied. Not to mention the supply limitations and logistical difficulties already facing the Soviets as they pressed Berlin. Conquering the rest of the European continent would not be within their capabilities at the time, and their eventual development of nuclear armaments was about a decade out.

And don't get me started on how Imperial Japan could have caused an even stronger eastern front for the Soviets (who, by the by, were engaging them in China at the time) without the US involved in the Pacific.

In short, your Hollywood/CoD understanding of military history and military science is severely deficient when formulating alternate history. Do see to that before taking potshots at our European friends and allies.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@FSTDT Doesn't Lie/Aunty FSTDT/FSTDT Doesn't Suck/Crushed Nuts/Nameless Coward

'Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"'

I guess you and your boyfriend Donald Fart will be giving a certain statue back to France.

'Freedom Fries'*. The recent mass shootings in Paris. Yep, there's nothing like good ol' fashioned integrity. As proved by all those unconcerned about Muslims in the US - since the mid-19th Century - up to just after 10th September 2001.

image

...yet, the above from an edition of "Diners, Drive-ins and Dives", when Guy Fieri visited 'Moroccan Bites' in San Antonio, Texas: the 'Buckle in the Bible Belt'. A few years ago.

*- Proving your ignorance 'French Fries' aren't French: they were invented in Belgium: 'Frites'. And potatoes were introduced to Europe by the Spanish. PROTIP: The potato originated in Peru & Bolivia. Oh, teh irony. I guess Idaho can start throwing it's entire crop out of the country, and start growing something else, due to it's origins across the border. Because it's not as if your country can create it's own things: jet engines via captured Messerschmitt Me-262s. No ICBMs or man on the moon if not for the not-American Werner von Braun. The Manhattan Project wouldn't have gotten off the drawing board stage - and thus the US's now superpower status - if not for the vital equations of a certain Albert Einstein: an immigrant.

So really, you & all your right-wing ilk really have no right to be bigoted, least of all have the right to even think of having an 'Opinion' about immigration: you seem to conveniently forget about the fact that your country is based on nothing but immigrants. Otherwise, give the Statue of Liberty back to France.

Unless Donald Fart does something about it himself. And he can lead by example: have himself deported from the US. Were [i]his[/i] ancestors born there...?

(from Wiki link):

'His mother was born at Tong on the Scottish island of Lewis'

'Trump's paternal grandparents, Elizabeth (née Christ) and Frederick Trump, were emigrants who moved to the United States from Germany in 1885'

Quite the 'Storied Pomp' being displayed by Donald Fart: that which Lady Liberty isn't supposed to welcome.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"No! Trump is most definitely not a racist!"

Actually it's even easier to prove the claim that Trump is racist:

http://www.celebtricity.com/donald-trump-exposed-as-member-of-the-kkk-by-anonymous/

The RAF making Hitler their bitch in the Battle of Britain; making that inferior subhuman Austrian cack himself at the thought of invading my country: 1940. North American Aviation needed an engine for their P-51 Mustang. What was it again, Nameless Coward? Oh yes, that's right: the Rolls-Royce V-12 Merlin: the same engine used in those Hitler-raping Spitfires & Hurricanes in 1940.

Because of Churchill sharing his Enigma-decoded intel. via Bletchley Park & Alan Turing to messrs Roosevelt & Eisenhower, thus shortening the war in Europe, and 600,000+ US troops returned home. 'Lease-Lend'? Debt Paid.

...now go trim your pubes boy, and get a real history education.

hasselhoff #fundie reddit.com

45 comments

Confused?