“Mainstream society is savagely judgmental of sexual pleasure, and cruel towards anything and anyone that stands out as different.” https://www.consensualdominance.com/?p=224
Sex is for making children.
Any man who has sex with women because it “feels good” is gay.
Oh my pee pee feels good this is great!
In fact if you are 40 with less then 5 children you’re probably gay.
All that feel-good pee pee sex and hardly any genetic legacy?
This is a psyop to make you gay
“Muscle mommy” fetish is literally homosexuality
First it was the vax
Then they got TikTok brain kids to goon over these “women”
If you have ever found yourself attracted to this you desperately need to raise your test levels.
Pornhub Wants to Turn Straight Men Gay Says Michael Knowles - Metro Weekly
( Clarus )
Pornhub has been exposed pushing a lot of transgender content, even saying it can help people find their sexual identity.
Over time, we see more and more that most transgender individuals are just perverts created by mass porn-watching, who want to emulate what they see. Porn-addiction is a major factor in transitioning.
( Mandy )
And all of this has gone hand in hand with a societal push not to kink-shame.
I think we need more kink-shaming. Keep it in the bedroom, don't parade it around in public. Let the private stay private.
( Mandy )
Pretty sure it's not possible to "turn someone gay" unless they are that way inclined already.
AGP men are straight men obsessed with becoming the object of their own desires. Other TIMs are gays in denial.
In the same way, a lot of TIFs are yaoi-addled girls and women who yearn for that perfect gay relationship of two equal partners devoted to each other through thick and thin. Or lesbians in denial.
Hypno sissy porn has nothing to do with lesbians, just as yaoi is nothing to do with real gay sex and relationships.
( happy-harpy )
I think that men’s sexuality is more opportunistic than women’s. They famously stick their dicks in anything and prison gay is a thing and all that. Turning people gay is stupid, right-wing fear-mongering but it doesn’t surprise me that porn is warping the sexuality of men who watch it. It’s basically propaganda that you masturbate to.
(trying to argue that the term “femboy,” even when used by and about cis men, is transphobic)
Enter femboys. Femboys often look exactly like the standard trap — a very young, semi-androgynous, flat-chested, thin, white anime girl — though they’re frequently depicted even more salaciously because the artist has no reason to “conceal their masculine traits,” instead drawing attention to their genitals.
The default reasoning people use as to why this concept isn’t transmisogynistic is that femboys are gender-nonconforming boys who aren’t trying to trick anyone into believing that they’re girls. […] However, this argument completely ignores that half of the issue with traps and futanari is that they are a fetish. In every instance, a great deal of emphasis is placed on the penis — it’s shocking and unexpected; it’s connotative of a cis boy in disguise; it’s accentuation goes hand-in-hand with male femininity, designating male femininity as inherently erotic. […]
This is what you’re contributing to when you normalize the fetishization of “femboys,” the fetishization of the juxtaposition between a feminine presentation with a so-called “masculine” biology.
(arguing that the male pregnancy/”mpreg” kink is transphobic and wrong)
Trans men are being ignored in favour of cis men, despite the cis men characters embodying traits of trans men in order to create/progress a certain narrative. This is textbook fetishization.
[…]So essentially, cis men are used instead of trans men, which is fetishistic, but even when trans men are used, it’s nearly always fetishistic in how the characters and narrative are handled.
[…]any media content that doesn’t explicitly humanize trans people will end up being transphobic.
[…]if they’re not trans, then the work is a transphobic write-off
[…]In reality, mpreg doesn’t explicitly claim to be related to trans (or intersex) people, but it cannot be viewed outside of that context in a world where trans and intersex people are also displaced from our bodies and our realities by cis dyadic people, in a world where our body parts are literally objectified and fetishized and removed from our humanity. I literally don’t give a crap what anyone’s intent is, that’s the reality of it, that’s representation that harms trans and intersex people, and if people fail to realize that, then they’re harming trans and intersex people, categorically.
Pornography is one of the most powerful forms of control, because you cooperate in your own enslavement. Because of the deranging and darkening effect it has on the mind, you become increasingly less aware of what's actually happening to you, less conscious of the self-destruction you are employing against yourself.
And because it functions this way, it has also been instrumentalized. Sexual "liberation" is political control. Wilhelm Reich essentially wrote the playbook here, though we see plenty of precursors, and in the Enlightenment tradition, Marquis de Sade stands out (though he did not have access to mass media like we do).
As Chesterton observed, such "freedom" is the most transparent of all bribes that slavery can make to rob us of our freedom. Pleasure is far more effective than pain because it conceals the coercive nature of the act. Marcuse saw such things as a conservative force masquerading as "liberation", one intended as a distraction (like bread and circuses) and a way of sapping the attention and energies (and I would add intelligence) of those who partake that could otherwise be used toward criticism. The deranging effect is the worst effect of all, as such, but also because its effects can far outlast the period of consumption.
That people can use VPNs is not a substantive argument against bans or restrictions on pornography.