For the heretics at Animal Planet to claim "The evolutionary development of today’s bears and raccoons began roughly 30 million years ago" is absurd to say the least. How do they know that? What scientific proof do they have to support their bizarre claims? That's right, NONE! Evolution is still as best--ONLY A THEORY. In sharp contrast to evolution, the Word of God aligns perfectly with science and nature.
45 comments
If you don't understand the first thing about science, you can't complain that it doesn't make sense.
willful ignorance is not an argument against facts.
"What scientific proof do they have to support their bizarre claims? That's right, NONE!"
None that will convince a closed-minded shit-for-brains like you. Meanwhile, God making a mud man or a rib-woman isn't bizarre in the slightest! So what did he make bears and raccoons out of? Boogers?
What scientific proof do they have to support their bizarre claims?
There's plenty of evidence, which is only ignored by people who invent bizarre and unsupported "what-ifs". What evidence is there, outside of a defective and contradictory book written by a bunch of bronze age Arab sheepherders who claimed they were speaking for God, that it wasn't 30 million years ago?
Word of God aligns perfectly with science and nature
I'm sure it does. What does that have to do with the man-made nonsense in the Bible?
I'm sure the biologists and naturalists that study the evolutionary development of bears and raccoons have at least some evidence, seeing as how they took some time, even a few seconds, even one second to pay attention to how it actually happens.
I like the bit where he says:
"Carefully notice that evolutionists NEVER use the word 'may'. It would be more honest and scholarly of them if they said... "today’s bears and raccoons MAY HAVE began roughly 30 million years ago." But, no, they teach their speculation and theories as if it were a FACT."
Quite right! After all, science doesn't deal in absolutes ; even the most cherished fact in science is merely an observation repeatedly confirmed to an absurd degree.
Of course, why stop at just science?Genesis:
In the beginning God may have created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was possibly formless and empty, perhaps darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God might have been hovering over the waters somewhere.
And God could have said, "Let there be light," and perhaps there was light. God could potentially see that the light was good, and He might have separated the light from the darkness. God very likely would have called the light "day", and the darkness he might possibly have called "night". And maybe there was evening and there was morning too. Pretty much the first day then.
The word of Yaldabaoth is still as[sic] best -- ONLY A MYTH...and aligns perfectly with my compost heap.*
Natural law is intrinsic to nature. Scientists understand this.
[edit]
* My compost heap is not speaking to me after that remark. I suppose I should throw another fundie on top to placate it.
That's not right. They have one. They have analised the DNA of both animals and they have found evidence in the fossiles and the animals themselves. That you're not familiarised with their method, doesn't mean that they have NONE. The Bible can't explain, for example, why monkeys spread AIDS to us(it doesn't explain what AIDS is, to begin with)
So now even Animal Planet is a bastion of evil in the world?
The "word of God" only aligns with science and nature when all are written on the same line, none of the tenets align very well.
"For the heretics at Animal Planet to claim "The evolutionary development of today’s bears and raccoons began roughly 30 million years ago" is absurd to say the least." They should have said, "The evolutionary development of today’s bears and raccoons began roughly 3.8 billion years ago, at the same time as evolutionary development began in every other species on Earth."
*headdesk*
In sharp contrast to evolution, the Word of God aligns perfectly with science and nature
Aruseus save us from David J. Stewart willful stupidity.
What scientific proof do they have to support their bizarre claims?
Step 1: Go to a university or college library.
Step 2: Ask the reference librarian where the books and journals on evolution are.
Step 3: Start reading.
Step 4: Talk to us in about five years.
Yep, especially how Noah just HAPPENED to live within walking distance of EVERY SINGLE animal species on Earth, and managed to fit TWO OF EACH of said species on a boat for fourty days and fourty nights, without any of them eating eachother.
"What scientific proof do they have to support their bizarre claims? That's right, NONE! Evolution is still as best--ONLY A THEORY"
The Natural History Museum here in London awaits. All it takes is for you to fly over here to the UK.
...oh, that's right. You can't. Because of the fact you have a criminal record for being convicted of having sex with an underage girl, you kiddy-diddling nonce.
Those who shout the loudest have the most to hide.
"In sharp contrast to evolution, the Word of God aligns perfectly with science and nature."
But insects have six legs. :U
Jesus Christ IS RIGHTEOUS, BECAUSE He NEVER sinned!!!
-And Jesus made it possible to swap places with us sinners,
Kitzmiller vs. Dover. Romans 13:1-5 says that science is fact, and itself - Scripture - is lies .
And via your own KJV, your 'God' agrees with the plaintiffs, John E. Jones III: the Conservative Christian Judge who ruled in the favour of such, and thus scientists, don't bother your 'Lord' - and therefore them - about it.
You are forced to agree with your 'God's decision: Romans 13:1-5 says so.
You know the ultimate penalty for not obeying all of your 'Word of God'.
Enjoy your paradox, Davey-boy...! >:D
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
