"guess you're not so different then us lowly ol dumb theists eh? :P "
Yes, that's nice dear...:
(*Performs 'Patronise You no Jutsu': pats dbznarutofan2008 on head OVER 9000 times*)
image
And the title of that particular thread this quote comes from is extremely telling (especially the forum it originates in): 'I really I hope this movie doesn't tank because of prejudicing atheists"
Oh, y'think so?! [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Almighty
Budget $81 million
Box office $484,592,874
As opposed to, say... the sequel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Almighty
Budget $175 million
Box office $173,418,781
Now, little Narutard: Can you do the maths? I can. The original Jim Carrey film was more of a 'What If': as in 'What would you do if you were God?' It made nearly six times it's expenditure, profiting greatly. The sequel - more heavy on the religious, Biblical aspects - didn't even return on it's (very large) budget; 'Tank'? It became one of the biggest bombs next to "Waterworld". Now, what was the title of that forum thread again, o Narutard...?!
Don't count on bookmakers such as William Hill or Paddy Power taking bets on "Noah" being a 'success'. I refer you to "Evan Almighty". The Atheistic cinemagoers aren't as 'tard-ed' - certainly 'dumb' - as you think... oh yeah, that's right: you don't think. Period.
I can confidently predict that not even the 'Ark' built for "Evan Almighty" will be able to save Russell & co. when that film equally sinks; you'll certainly need Kevin Costner to save the credibility of you Bibliotards, 'faith'-wise. One word: Perception. >:D
@Mister Spak
'liberal atheist tards'
So sayeth the Narutard.
He's gonna need a lot of Mirror Polish, eh?