A corollary of light photons having an absolute speed, its measurement as such, not being subject to the relative motions of the rest of objects in space-time, is that its origin is a non-local reference-frame.
Moreover, how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God? Since such agent needs to know who (which potential Observers) are motionless or traveling at a constant speed, where on the globe, and at what speed, in order to adjust the speed of such photons to always hit said traveling object at its absolute speed.
That is, unless we have two worlds coinhering – which is what the mainstream religions attest. Certainly Christianity.
26 comments
Wow, someone threw together a bunch of big words in an effort to sound smart. Next time, try making your point with words that actually go together. The randomness in which you arranged your words doesn't help you make your point.
Wow. Coinhering! A new word plus a lot of convoluted words designed to make the writer look more intelligent than he really is. Typical fundie.
"Since such agent needs to know who (which potential Observers) are motionless or traveling at a constant speed, where on the globe, and at what speed, in order to adjust the speed of such photons to always hit said traveling object at its absolute speed."
Motionless! Please. If your car is travelling at 99.9999% (recurring) of the speed of light, the lights from its headlights are still traveling at the speed of light. That's why it's called the Theory of Relativity. It can't be broken.
A corollary of light photons having an absolute speed, its measurement as such, not being subject to the relative motions of the rest of objects in space-time, is that its origin is a non-local reference-frame.
That is why morons should avoid using big words. What you WANTED to say was:
"photons having an absolute speed is a corollary of their non-local reference-frame origin."
Or in unpretentious English: "Photons have a constant speed because they come from outside the universe."
Then you continue to argue that the only way something can come from outside the universe is if someone was actually out there, throwing photons into the universe and making sure they don't change their speed. Then you conclude that this someone can only be God, and not just any God but the Christian God.
The problem is, your entire theory is based on your claim that photons come from somewhere outside the universe, which is factually incorrect. Have a nice day.
"Moreover, how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
Or the Flying Spaghetti Monster uses his noodly appendage. Didja think of that?
When fundies try to sound smart they throw together a bunch of big words that don't necessarily go together in an attempt to confuse people and make it difficult to fact-check their claims. When a good scientist (like Stephen Hawking) tries to sound smart he explains the most complex features of the universe in a way that anyone can understand it. Oh sure, he knows all of the scientific jargon and uses it with fellow researchers but when talking to the public his goal is to make his findings as clear as possible to his audience so they can examine them on their merits. Meanwhile, "smart" fundies try to cloud their talking points as much as possible so that they're more difficult to examine.
*WARNING! WORD SALAD!*
So, we have two worlds (I think you mean universes) coinhering (existing together), and you are suggesting that is a central idea of Christianity. So where is that in the Bible, or the Papel Bulls, or the Doctors of the Church, or Martin Luthor or Jake's Tongues and Snakes Emporium?
Or did you just make that up?
From years past ...
Rain: "how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
Crop failures: "how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
The Plague: "how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
Lightning: "how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
The motion of the planets: "how else can you explain that curious phenomenon other than the supervening of an omniscient and omnipotent being, aka God?"
... and now Axel wants to add the speed of light to the list.
Indeed! And, er...well said, er...well you said something anyway.
I'm guessing that we should all be giving thanks to Lord Athe because of er...light, er...probably.
Well anyway, thanks pal for illuminating. That was as clear as mud.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.