Just more proof of what the ultimate intent of the 1964 [Civil Rights Act] was originally intended to do. Oh sure, there was some cool neato shit about blacks at a lunch counter. Yeah, we got the memo on that(check) and the after school specials Roots and The Color Purple and all that other gay ass shit, sure, but bottom line the 1964 CRA was a trojan horse.
Ever since the civil rights BULLSHIT, there has been no such thing as personal private property rights. Now the government uses the 1964 CRA as a battering ram to do whatever it wants all to defend 'the little guy' or Kunte Kinta or now some bleating queer.
IF you happen to be a landlord, you are now officially NO LONGER the owner of said property. No. You are now a partner with the federal government. They have guidelines against discrimination and if you cross them, you can be liable civilly and punitive action can be taken against you.
IF you are a business owner, you are now officially NO LONGER the owner of said business. No. You are now a partner(*ahem* SUBJECT) of the federal government. Through their state run organs of the EEOC they can tell you what you can and cannot do, who you can and cannot serve, who you can and cannot hire(quotas) and who you can and cannot fire(wrongful term/discrimination).
No more trauma has been done to our freedoms combined than this one law of emotive crap and it affects everything we do. There are no more personal property rights for those laws are all under subservience to the 1964 CRA.
Now the faggots want to use the same whiny banner to walk under. No surprise there. According to the 1964 CRA, these mayors are correct. They can ban Chic-Fil-A. They can probably file a class action. That is what the law was intended to do and that is what it was for. To control society at every level.
Wyatt Junker, Where Liberty Dwells 34 Comments
[8/9/2012 3:15:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 51
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog