I'm pretty sure that if you honestly think that homosexuality is a religion, you no longer have anything meaningful to contribute to social discourse.
8/6/2012 5:39:59 PM
Same shit, different guy.
No one actually wants that, no one does that. Cry about your lost privileges.
8/6/2012 5:44:01 PM
I can't imagine the mental gymnastics you had to do to come up with this bullshit.
8/6/2012 5:52:38 PM
My god that mirror is shiny
8/6/2012 5:52:55 PM
Filin De Blanc
Oh shut the fuck up. You're not even attempting to string together a coherent argument. Go away.
8/6/2012 6:09:13 PM
The government not allowing same sex marriage is unconstitutional. The equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment guarantees that all rights protected for one must be protected for all. A woman has the right to marry a man, but I, solely based on my gender, do not have that same right. That is sexual discrimination and unconstitutional.
8/6/2012 6:17:10 PM
fundies! y u no change ur arguments?! y u no grow up?
another p.r.a.t.t... i swear, this one is about as tired as hamsterdance, and twice as annoying
8/6/2012 6:22:23 PM
"People do not have a "Constitutional right" to have the government force their religion of perverse desires on the rest of society"
100% true. Which is exactly why you need to shut the fuck up.
8/6/2012 6:29:46 PM
Blue the Thief
8/6/2012 7:21:36 PM
1. Homosexuality is not a religion.
2. Separate but equal is not equal.
3. Public opinion is turning against you. Cry harder; I savor your tears like fine wine.
8/6/2012 7:26:22 PM
their new religion
Even if homosexuality were a religion, it would hardly be new. In addition, that would make heterosexuality a religion too.
Being an agnostic would make me what? A priss? Or at least the male version of a priss?
If you're going to try to use the Establishment Clause to ban same sex marriage, then I'll use it to ban the Republican Party.
8/6/2012 8:11:04 PM
Marriages have been going on for much longer than religions, dear.
8/6/2012 8:18:15 PM
"People do not have a "Constitutional right" to have the government force their religion of perverse desires on the rest of society and for government to establish this new religion. "
Why do people not understand that this is WHY gay marriage should be allowed?
8/6/2012 8:34:00 PM
Someone needs to take a civics 101 class.
8/6/2012 8:48:48 PM
Percy Q. Shunn
Your lack of knowledge and sense would be laughable, were it not so very pathetic.
8/6/2012 9:23:32 PM
You mean the amendment that has been all but broken by your crazy attempts to turn America into a larger-scale Christian version of Iran? And stop crying, already. You Christians been the ones always on the offensive throughout history, and now you're crying because your targets fight back.
Also, you are right about people not having the right to have government force their religion of perverse desires upon the rest of society. Why do you think your opposition has finally grown a spine, Christian?
8/6/2012 9:53:27 PM
8/6/2012 10:05:36 PM
What about the religions that do allow gay marriage, aren't they also protected by the first amendment? But, at least you believe in the legal rights of gays for the most part, compared to other fundie fucktards who want none.
8/7/2012 12:31:43 AM
Labeling something you don't like as a religion does not make it so.
8/7/2012 1:22:34 AM
Last time I checked, heterosexual and conservatard extremists have been shoving their religion and tenets down everyone's throat far longer than any other religion in its comparison. Religion is not to be established as the single most supported by the government yet you little wingnuts continue to try to do that every time you get into office. I'm surprised he didn't end his post with God bless 'Merica, thus pissing on the country with different beliefs than him.
8/7/2012 2:40:39 AM
Even if it really were a religion, the first amendment would require the government to not hinder their exercise of alleged religion.
8/7/2012 4:18:39 AM
Nobody is trying to do any of the things you are implying.
We are just trying to stop your fellow bigots from removing rights from certain groups.
Gays were gtting married in the 1960s.
You didnt notice intill the 1990s, and you went apeshit trying to overturn their marriages.
8/7/2012 4:58:32 AM
"If you want the legal coverage of you being in a perverse relationship, then call it a union and ask for legal protections from the government.
But the fact that this is "not enough" for the activists proves it's not about the government providing the same "legal rights""
The fact that you want to limit same sex unions to "unions" but not allow marriages proves it's not about government providing the same "legal rights" but rather an attack on the constitution and Traditional American Values, trying to force your false religion on the rest of us and trying to use the government to force and establish this false religion on society, passing laws to establish this false religion, to establish this false religious definition of marriage, all of which is a violation of the First Ammendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, which is exactly what they'd be doing if they pass laws forcing us to accept their old mythology.
People do not have a "Constitutional right" to have the government force their religion of perverse desires on the rest of society and for government to establish this old mythology.
You have legal rights via religious ceremonies. That you demand the "right" for the government to enforce your old mythology instead and make laws establishing it says it all and is the only true violation of the Constitution.
8/7/2012 5:17:50 AM
People do not have a "Constitutional right" to have the government force their religion of perverse desires on the rest of society
I agree 100%. Remember this the next time you want to put God into government.
8/7/2012 5:21:43 AM
Clearly this poster does not know what the word religion means. Just another parrot.
8/7/2012 6:18:36 AM