1 2 3 4
#1419123
Papabear
Never mind who you love, you must pick someone who is circumcised.
7/3/2012 8:33:53 AM
#1419124
KittyKaboom
I'm not trampy and to be honest, I love an uncircumcised man. The skin that's removed is actually extremely sensitive, so when it's cut a man will lose some of the sensation in his penis. Also, left intact, the skin isn't stretched so tight over his erection and the sex is more pleasurable for him. Makes things awesome for both of us.
7/3/2012 8:38:32 AM
#1419125
KittyKaboom
Double post. My bad.
7/3/2012 8:39:15 AM
#1419126
Mystik Spiral
Circumcisions are like baptisms... neither should be performed unless and until the recipient is old enough to consent. My sister had my oldest nephew circumcised in the hospital right after he was born (they're Catholic) and 12 years later I can't forget how he cried when they had to change his diaper and put ointment on his little penis when he was barely a week old.
7/3/2012 8:42:21 AM
#1419131
Callyn
Yay genital mutilation...
Good job, Germany. If only other countries would join you.
7/3/2012 8:53:29 AM
#1419136
J. James
Jesus. Nobody said you can't choose to have yourself circumcised(ew!), but no one can force it on you. Good for Germany.
Also, what? Just because sex is arguably more pleasurable(more comfortable, certainly) for unaltered males, doesn't mean that women would give a shit! Why on earth would THEY care?
7/3/2012 9:06:48 AM
#1419137
"If one of your boys wants to be circumcised"
Difficult to fucking tell with a baby, mate.
"Some tramp that sleeps with uncut guys"
I... I simply do not know what to say to this. Fuck you, too.
7/3/2012 9:09:01 AM
#1419149
Meishayuri
Uh, what?
7/3/2012 9:39:44 AM
#1419154
toth
@John_in_Oz Since when does the First Amendment enshrine the right to mutilate your child's junk?
7/3/2012 9:57:10 AM
#1419156
Binky
All of the claims of sexual health benefits are moot for deciding to circumcise babies. When the person approaches the age of being sexually active they can make their own decision to get it done (which this law completely allows).
7/3/2012 10:02:18 AM
#1419157
SaneChick
I don't give a crap what the quality of the sex is like for either party, or even if there is a hygiene question really involved...
Don't fucking cut off part of a person's body unless it's really fucking medically necessary... Until they're old enough to at least fucking spell "lawsuit."
7/3/2012 10:02:44 AM
#1419163
Reynardine
Yeah, of course, I'd teach my daughter to ask every guy that before their first date.
7/3/2012 10:19:58 AM
#1419165
The Duelist
Who the fuck wants to be circumcised? That's the whole point of doing it when they're infants. Also, this; "If I had a daughter she would be taught, first never to date or marry outside her people and secondly if she did only circumcised males."
Racist, fascist prick. Go screw yourself.
7/3/2012 10:29:08 AM
#1419176
Tatsukun
LOL, some guys can't get past the "denial" stage of realizing and accepting that a major chunk of their penis was hacked off. If this moron is teaching his daughter to choose based on intact/shredded penis, how is she going to find this out on the first date? oh, he's raising that sort of girl...
7/3/2012 11:03:19 AM
#1419181
jimboaw
Wow, I've been married to a tramp for 42 years and didn't know it. Thank goodness my parents were not sadists.
7/3/2012 11:16:27 AM
#1419186
rrpostal
"our people"
What, assholes are group identifying now?
7/3/2012 11:34:48 AM
#1419192
fishtank
luckily, my gf likes my uncut dick just fine.
7/3/2012 11:52:19 AM
#1419204
Martha Jones
In the words of my mother: "Is he an adult? Fine, he can make that choice for himself, and if he wants to, he wants to. Is he an a infant? Then wait until he can make the decision himself."
I go a bit more extreme than her, though. I think if you were born with it, and it's not causing you any problems, then leave it alone for pete's sake.
7/3/2012 12:22:31 PM
#1419209
checkmate
the baning of circumcision in Germany
Woah! Stop right there. Let's check our facts.
From a legal standpoint, circumcision has not been banned in Germany. All that happened was that a court ruled that it can be seen as criminal assault and bodily injury. There's no government bann, although indirectly it does amount to the same thing.
This isn't going to stop Rabbis and Imams from doing it, it'll just be done behind closed doors and not in the hospitals where the doctors will be afraid of litigation from one side or another.
7/3/2012 12:29:09 PM
#1419218
Wykked Wytch
... I'm not sure what he means by "FU."
7/3/2012 12:45:58 PM
#1419220
John
This is a tough call. Jews have circumcised their male children for over 3,000 years and it's an integral part of their religious beliefs and cultural identity. I suspect in the US such a law would run into First Amendment issues under the "free exercise" clause.
7/3/2012 12:49:14 PM
#1419222
Tramp
There is only one valid reason to perform a circumcision and that´s phimosis. Baby boys don´t have phimosis, one needs to be well into puberty to get that diagnose.
7/3/2012 12:54:32 PM
#1419223
dfmfundies
@ John_in_Oz:
But I agree with the U.S. first amendment. The State has no right to dictate to parents who are trying to do their best by their kids, in the parent's best judgement, no matter how crazy they are.
The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to perform unnecessary surgery on someone incapable of consent.
If female "circumcision" is wrong, then so is the male version.
7/3/2012 12:56:54 PM
#1419228
Atheissimo
We get it, you're proud of your mutilated wang. Just don't expect the same from everyone else
7/3/2012 1:15:27 PM
#1419229
John
@dfmfundies: "The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to perform unnecessary surgery on someone incapable of consent. "
It's not that simple. Here's what the Bible said in Genesis 17: "And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you. And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations ... And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant." That's a pretty clear order with serious consequences coming from what observant Jews believe to be God himself.
The Constitution's free exercise clause doesn't give license to do things contrary to civil law, but the courts have held that the law must make "reasonable accommodation". Whether allowing infants to be circumcised constitutes reasonable accommodation would be a judgment call.
7/3/2012 1:26:46 PM
1 2 3 4