1 2
#1411672
Tatch
>It doesn't make people disregard reason!
>If the earth was next to a black hole when it was made that would explain this one thing that doesn't make sense!
Welp, gotta get a new irony meter.
6/10/2012 3:12:48 PM
#1411673
Nihlum
I... Uhhh... Wait, what?
6/10/2012 3:16:11 PM
#1411675
Dark_Lord_Prime
"Technically there is one source, realisticly they are two different sources..."
So, if you shine a light into a mirror, the mirror is now a separate light source?
Interesting "reasoning."
6/10/2012 3:23:21 PM
#1411678
SpukiKitty
"Christianity does not require people to disregard their reason, or to be credulous"
Then 'Godschild', like a gazillion fundies like him/her, contradicts that very point (a point that's valid when applied to normal, non-fundie Christians) by saying something totaly loony.
6/10/2012 3:31:17 PM
#1411680
shykid
"Christianity does not require people to disregard their reason, or to be credulous"
Fair enough, but you at least sure seem hellbent on doing so.
6/10/2012 3:43:03 PM
#1411685
Firewing
"Christianity does not require people to disregard their reason, or to be credulous"
So far you're proving that it does require such things. In other words, what was already known.
6/10/2012 4:27:04 PM
#1411686
Tempus
Christianity does not require people to disregard their reason, or to be credulous
If you sincerely believe that the universe is only a few thousand years old, then you are disregarding your reason.
If during the creation the earth was close to a black hole then scientificly it would work.
How? Please explain.
Technically there is one source, realisticly they are two different sources,
Since the moon is no more than reflector, there is only one light source--realistically or technically.
the light reflected by the moon would forever be lost to the earth if the moon did not reflect the light.
The moon is a piss-poor reflector, being roughly about as reflective as a chunk of charcoal. Most of the light of the sun IS forever lost to Earth.
6/10/2012 4:31:34 PM
#1411687
Mayhem
So, when did the black hole get created?
6/10/2012 4:33:16 PM
#1411690
John
Santa Claus? He would have to travel faster than the speed of light to deliver presents to the whole world in one night. All you have to do is say he travels faster than the speed of light. If you can just make stuff up out of thin air, you can explain anything.
6/10/2012 5:08:51 PM
#1411696
Berny
Creationists, as usual, are reality denying morons.
Godschild merely proves the rule.
6/10/2012 5:46:21 PM
#1411701
anevilmeme
What is it about fundies that makes them immune to even the concept of irony?
6/10/2012 6:00:43 PM
#1411703
Mad_Jester
If during its creation the Earth were close to a black hole, then 'realisticly' and 'scientificly' (sic) there'd be no Earth. You have clearly, despite your assertions, disregarded reason in favour of a truly feeble attempt to reconcile reality with your unsupportable biblical hooey.
6/10/2012 6:03:48 PM
#1411704
Oh My Dog!
please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe please let this be a poe...
If not, I've lost all hope for Humanity.
6/10/2012 6:06:13 PM
#1411705
DA
Wouldn't a black hole consume the whole fucking planet if it was that close??
6/10/2012 6:06:32 PM
#1411711
Raised by Horses
"If during the creation the earth was close to a black hole then scientificly it would work. Technically there is one source, realisticly they are two different sources, the light reflected by the moon would forever be lost to the earth if the moon did not reflect the light."
Someone please find us a picture of Carl Sagan or Neil Degrasse Tyson facepalming.
6/10/2012 6:22:26 PM
#1411712
checkmate
Technically there is one source, realisticly they are two different sources, the light reflected by the moon would forever be lost to the earth if the moon did not reflect the light.
Wrong. Fail.
First off, thechnically there are billions of sources. See all those stars out there? They give us light too, Not very much, not enough to read a newspaper, but enough so you can see them.
Secondly, the sun reflects its light off the Moon, but also the off planets, not to mention the [modern day] satellites and other man-made vehicles. So there are many more than just the one as far as reflections are concerned.
The Bible got it all wrong, many times over.
Next please.
6/10/2012 6:23:26 PM
#1411716
Karana
*dies from laughing too hard*
Your ideas are not only unreasonable, they're ludicrous.
Why would god make anything close to a black hole? I thought that earth was made first any way according to your book.
So you realize that technically the sun is the source of the moon's 'light', but then you contradict yourself in saying that it's now two sources(somehow). So, the black hole would steal the light from the sun reflecting off the moon? Or would it stop the moon from reflecting light at all? Is that what you're trying to say?
Either way, this is a bunch of ridiculous nonsense.
6/10/2012 6:30:00 PM
#1411719
rubber chicken
Didn't God look upon his creation and see that it was good ?
Goes to reason that he probably smiled and, being God, you just know that he's got an amazing set of pearly whites.
So the second light source was Gods beaming smile.
C'mon fundies, keep up!
6/10/2012 6:48:07 PM
#1411720
Old Viking
Thank you for your moronic observation.
6/10/2012 7:05:00 PM
#1411724
Hoplite
Holy misfiring neurons, Batman!
6/10/2012 7:22:17 PM
#1411733
Alencon
If the earth was "close" to a black hole, I don't think any of us would be here and since when does a reflecting object become a seperate light source?
You're right about one thing, Christianity can't make you disregard what you obviously never had to begin with.
6/10/2012 8:07:11 PM
#1411738
Serpensium
If a black hole were to impact Earth then yes, it would be destroyed, but otherwise it would merely exert a gravitational attraction equivalent to its mass. Which may still have some very detrimental effects. Don't know where the black hole would come from though...
6/10/2012 8:31:05 PM
#1411742
Osiris
And how did it not get sucked into the black hole? And why was a black hole there in the first place? Or you could listen to science, which doesn't require you to forget everything you know about anything for no reason.
6/10/2012 9:10:11 PM
#1411753
Tempus
@DA: not necessarily.
In the unlikely, never-gonna-happen event that our sun transformed itself into a black hole, the object would be only a few miles in diameter--and our solar system's planets would continue to orbit in their customary orbits, with the only real change being that it would soon become rather dark and cold, since that object would still have the sun's mass and exert the sun's gravity.
6/10/2012 10:38:09 PM
#1411754
ChakatBlackstar
something tells me this guy doesn't know how black holes work. I'd have to double check, but I'm pretty sure if a black hole was strong enough and close enough to do that, it would destroy the earth.
6/10/2012 10:39:13 PM
1 2