1 2 3 4
David J. Steward is a delusional fucktard who seems to fall prey to Satan at the drop of a hat.
I don't believe in either Satan or God and I've never been seduced by my waitress at Hooters. Go figure.
5/15/2012 9:07:01 AM
I almost feel guilty by enjoying this fucker's slip into insanity.
5/15/2012 9:51:19 AM
This guy is becoming boring. He's run out of things to bitch about, and it's becoming predictable and a bit nutty. Next week he'll be bitching about how the curvaceous Mrs. Butterworth bottle is making him want to have sex with children.
5/15/2012 10:18:30 AM
@Raised by Horses
No need to wait. David J. Stewar(t) is already a convicted sex offender. This fact is what makes his moralizing more despicable, as it is his attempt to draw attention away from his child predation.
5/15/2012 10:44:02 AM
Damn! Dave, that's one hell of a commercial. I've never had the urge to go to a Hooters before, but I damn sure do now.
WooHoo! Bring on the Hoots.
5/15/2012 10:55:59 AM
If you have so little self-control then why don't you make yourself a eunuch and save yourself from the 'evil' of Hooters? Here's a knife. Go for it.
5/15/2012 10:58:33 AM
Filin De Blanc
Half of all Stewart's quotes seem to basically be long-winded versions of the "that little whore made me do it!" defence he no doubt tried when his child molestation came to light. It didn't work on the prosecutor, and it's not going to work on us, you filthy kiddy-fiddler.
5/15/2012 11:00:51 AM
NOTHING is more evil than that? Not even...HOMOSEXUALITY?
*sits back and watches head explode
5/15/2012 11:10:55 AM
But the wings are good. That's really the main point of Hooters for us.
And I enjoy watching the sad single middle-aged nerds who seem to think the young waitresses are flirting with them for some reason other than a hefty tip.
5/15/2012 11:19:41 AM
I wonder what this fucktard thinks about Chippendales...
5/15/2012 11:31:14 AM
How presumptuous of you, Davey. Most women don't dress in a way you consider provocative just to tease men (much less you personally). They usually dress a certain way because they find it attractive or—heaven forbid—comfortable and practical.
Even if we wax feminist and take into consideration the potential effect on women of patriarchal standards and norms (i.e. an unrealistic, objectifying, and male-centric ideal of female beauty and the expectation of women to strive toward that ideal), then any particular woman's provocative wardrobe is most likely, if not still a result of her own personal taste and uncoerced choice, the result of either patriarchy-influenced taste or social expectations, not any conscious desire to "tease" or "attract" men.
...and this is not taking into account the heteronormative assumption that even if a woman were dressing "sexy and sensual" to "seduce" someone, then it is a male. We'll gloss over that, though, since feminism is already too much for you to stand without adding all that queer stuff into it too. Hell, since most people are straight and cisgendered, I usually let such automatic assumptions of sexual orientation and gender identity slide, anyway, provided that they are not specifically intended to exclude, deny, or shame LGBT people.
All of that aside, good grief, dude. There is nothing wrong with finding someone sexually attractive, and you can do it without objectifying them or being creepy. Having a sex drive is perfectly normal. Maybe you wouldn't be so angry all the time if you let go of your self-righteous sexual repression, grabbed your manhood instead, and let yourself rub one out without feeling guilty or blaming others for "making" you do it.
5/15/2012 11:36:17 AM
What about cheating at hopscotch?
5/15/2012 12:41:04 PM
I think I missed a memo. Satan's grand plan for the Final Battle and bringing about the End Times somehow includes selling chicken wings? How does this fit in exactly? Is Satan trying to get so much grease and Buffalo Sauce on God's Plan that God Himself won't be able to read it? (It's not like anyone else can make sense of it even now!)
.... "Titties and Beer?"
5/15/2012 1:23:28 PM
...so, raping the women and brutally mudering them would be less evil? Molesting children?
5/15/2012 1:44:40 PM
Oh look, it's Frollo, I mean David J. Stewart! Of freaking course, it's never YOUR fault...you're perfect (cough) dipshit!
I do have a problem with Hooters because, like Pup said, it is degrading to women. That said, Dave has one screwed up moral compass!
5/15/2012 2:00:40 PM
"Girls Have Cooties" award.
5/15/2012 2:00:57 PM
Don't you think rather that David's problem is being taken in hand?
5/15/2012 2:13:53 PM
Man, I hate that Hooters place SO much! all those sexy, scantily clad, gorgeous women! it makes me so mad i just wanna spend like 2 days fucking the shit out every single waitress they have! that would show them for their evil exploitation of women that constantly make $5-10 tips....
5/15/2012 3:14:35 PM
Typical male fundie logic, if it gives me a stiffie it's evil and must die.
5/15/2012 3:15:03 PM
If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out.
If "Disney Channel offend" thee, turn the set off and read a book.
If Hooters offend thee, eat someplace else.
Not too hard for you to grasp, is it David?
5/15/2012 3:36:59 PM
Gee, and I thought the women at Hooters just dressed sexy to get tips. Who knew they were actually looking for sex? And besides, if you go to Hooters, you've already made the decision to see women in scanty outfits long before you got there.
5/15/2012 4:36:41 PM
I'm going to agree with SaneChick and say that there is PLENTY more evil things besides scantily clad women.
5/15/2012 4:39:48 PM
(1) Most of the men that go to Hooters aren't married and (2) I'm allowed to look as long as I refrain from touching.
5/15/2012 5:32:27 PM
The Trail of Tears?
The Death Star blowing up Alderaan?
They're all minor trifles, utter pittances, compared with the evil of a woman trying to get laid. Or serving Buffalo wings in a tight tee-shirt.
5/15/2012 5:45:09 PM
And their wings are overpriced and suck
5/15/2012 5:46:22 PM
1 2 3 4