Quote# 86835
Here are 10 reasons I believe Christian students in particular and possibly even teachers and staff should refuse to honor [the Day of Silence] by school attendance:
1. A silent protest in support of immoral, God-dishonoring behavior is in itself profoundly deceptive. All sexual behavior outside man/woman marriage is sinful in God’s eyes. Why should Christian students and teachers be in the position of accommodating this flagrant violation of their principles?
2. Any explicit or implicit message encouraging teens and even younger students to experiment freely with homosexual behavior is not “social justice” or “tolerance,” but actually, child corruption.
3. Allowing classroom silence to honor the Day of Silence unleashes tremendous peer pressure for students and even teachers to endorse sexual immorality, or be considered “enemies” of those peers and teachers proudly involved in homosexuality. This puts people of faith in the position of violating Christian doctrine through tacit approval (Romans 16:17-18; Ephesians 5:11). They are also intimidated into self-censoring their First Amendment rights.
4. The Day of Silence encourages students to nurture prejudiced, hostile and bigoted attitudes against Christians and others with traditional moral beliefs, and to spread inaccurate and harmful information.
5. Using legitimate concerns about bullying and teen suicide to advance the promotion of homosexuality in schools is educational malpractice. It’s totally unnecessary to stop bullying and prevent harm to students, and Christians should not be a party to this gross distortion of a genuine problem. No one needs to embrace homosexuality or gender confusion in order to prevent bullying, but GLSEN routinely takes this deceitful position.
6. Teachers know harassment when they see it. They can simply say, “Cut it out!” But GLSEN and the Day of Silence pressure teachers to amend this to, “Cut it out, because you are only permitted to say good things about homosexuality!” When did we all sign up to become public-relations agents for the good reputation of homosexuality? This viewpoint discrimination forces an untruthful and ungodly agenda on staff members, when stopping verbal harassment can be accomplished without becoming champions of “gay” behavior.
7. There are legitimate lessons students should learn about prejudice and bias. But Day of Silence promoters deceptively link moral objections about homosexuality to racial discrimination or anti-Semitism in an attempt to legitimize the pro-homosexual agenda and portray homosexuals as perennial victims, while disguising the harmfulness and risk.
8. Teachers have used the DOS to inappropriately become classroom advocates and models of this deviant behavior. In one Ohio school, a teacher used a PowerPoint presentation to tell students about her “gay” support and even disclosed to students that she was a lesbian, without prior notice to parents or permission from her principal.
9. The health and lifestyle risks of homosexuality are virtually never shared on the Day of Silence. Instead, students are given the deceitful impression that homosexuality is just as safe and worthy an identity as heterosexual dating and marriage.
10. The DOS message inhibits Christians from witnessing to their peers caught up in homosexuality or gender confusion. There is salvation through Jesus Christ and the hope of leaving this sin behind. Calling homosexuality a sin on the Day of Silence would be considered “hateful,” when it is actually God-honoring and respectful to the hearer. It may lead them to an eternal home with God. But that won’t happen if the truth is suppressed, which it always is on the Day of Silence. Stay home that day, and choose to witness on another, where perhaps you will have a fair chance of being heard.
Linda Harvey,
World Net Daily 63 Comments [4/11/2012 3:04:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 65
Submitted By: Zagen30
1 2 3
#1391371
Amadaun
I love 3: "They are also intimidated into self-censoring their First Amendment rights."
That is what the Day of Silence is about, why it takes that form. Gays have long been silenced by peer pressure. DOS makes it more visible.
But no, people voluntarily being silent scares and bullies Christian kids into not expressing themselves. That is much worse than telling them to die and that God hates them and bullying and threatening and hating them.
Why don't Christians adopt this policy, and commute all oppression of homosexuals to saying nothing all day one day a year? Since that's even worse.
4/11/2012 10:24:15 AM
#1391395
checkmate
The DOS message inhibits Christians from witnessing to their peers caught up in homosexuality or gender confusion.
Yeah, and it was hard for you to say "nigger" when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was in the room. Right?
I really feel sorry for you.
You may now go fuck yourself.
4/11/2012 11:49:24 AM
#1391398
Itachirumon
You know what? I'm fucking sick of you. Linda Harvey, go die in a fire, slowly.
4/11/2012 11:58:43 AM
#1391399
"It's my duty to persecute you and make you a second class citizen because my invisible friend says you're a filthy sinner"
See how it sounds when you say it?
4/11/2012 12:01:02 PM
#1391403
Swede
Here are 10 reasons I believe Christian students in particular and possibly even teachers and staff should refuse to honor [the Day of Silence] by school attendance:
1. A silent protest in support of immoral, God-dishonoring behavior is in itself profoundly deceptive. All sexual behavior outside man/woman marriage is sinful in God’s eyes. Why should Christian students and teachers be in the position of accommodating this flagrant violation of their principles?
Yes, because tolerating people who are slightly different than ourselves would be… tolerant. We can’t have that!
2. Any explicit or implicit message encouraging teens and even younger students to experiment freely with homosexual behavior is not “social justice” or “tolerance,” but actually, child corruption.
Yes, because allowing people to actually be who they are, without forcing them to hide parts of themselves would indeed be corruption. Wait a minute… hiding things is more corruptive than allowing it in the open.
3. Allowing classroom silence to honor the Day of Silence unleashes tremendous peer pressure for students and even teachers to endorse sexual immorality, or be considered “enemies” of those peers and teachers proudly involved in homosexuality. This puts people of faith in the position of violating Christian doctrine through tacit approval (Romans 16:17-18; Ephesians 5:11). They are also intimidated into self-censoring their First Amendment rights.
Huh? What? If you strongly feel that you can’t participate, you should of course be allowed to step out of the classroom before the Silence starts. Where’s the sexual immorality in being yourself, in not hiding and lying about yourself and your orientation?
4. The Day of Silence encourages students to nurture prejudiced, hostile and bigoted attitudes against Christians and others with traditional moral beliefs, and to spread inaccurate and harmful information.
No, it encourages students to NOT participate in prejudiced, hostile and bigoted attitudes against homosexuals and others with non-traditional orientations, and to spread accurate and non-biased information.
5. Using legitimate concerns about bullying and teen suicide to advance the promotion of homosexuality in schools is educational malpractice. It’s totally unnecessary to stop bullying and prevent harm to students, and Christians should not be a party to this gross distortion of a genuine problem. No one needs to embrace homosexuality or gender confusion in order to prevent bullying, but GLSEN routinely takes this deceitful position.
Hooray to bullies who force those immoral homos to commit suicide! Or what?
6. Teachers know harassment when they see it. They can simply say, “Cut it out!” But GLSEN and the Day of Silence pressure teachers to amend this to, “Cut it out, because you are only permitted to say good things about homosexuality!” When did we all sign up to become public-relations agents for the good reputation of homosexuality? This viewpoint discrimination forces an untruthful and ungodly agenda on staff members, when stopping verbal harassment can be accomplished without becoming champions of “gay” behavior.
When you became Christians, you became public-relation agents to “Love thy neighbor as yourself”, stupid.
7. There are legitimate lessons students should learn about prejudice and bias. But Day of Silence promoters deceptively link moral objections about homosexuality to racial discrimination or anti-Semitism in an attempt to legitimize the pro-homosexual agenda and portray homosexuals as perennial victims, while disguising the harmfulness and risk.
Not deceptively. There is no harmfulness or risk in “homosexual behavior” that does not also pop up in “heterosexual behavior”.
8. Teachers have used the DOS to inappropriately become classroom advocates and models of this deviant behavior. In one Ohio school, a teacher used a PowerPoint presentation to tell students about her “gay” support and even disclosed to students that she was a lesbian, without prior notice to parents or permission from her principal.
Prior notice or permission? Does she also need permission to tell her students she’s left-handed or of Native American heritage?
9. The health and lifestyle risks of homosexuality are virtually never shared on the Day of Silence. Instead, students are given the deceitful impression that homosexuality is just as safe and worthy an identity as heterosexual dating and marriage.
It IS just as safe and worthy an identity as heterosexual dating and marriage! Asshole! There is no risk with homosexuality, which does not also exist in heterosexuality.
10. The DOS message inhibits Christians from witnessing to their peers caught up in homosexuality or gender confusion. There is salvation through Jesus Christ and the hope of leaving this sin behind. Calling homosexuality a sin on the Day of Silence would be considered “hateful,” when it is actually God-honoring and respectful to the hearer. It may lead them to an eternal home with God. But that won’t happen if the truth is suppressed, which it always is on the Day of Silence. Stay home that day, and choose to witness on another, where perhaps you will have a fair chance of being heard.
Not being able to force your religion onto others is not discrimination, stupid. Repressing an orientation will only cause problem to everyone in the family of the repressed. The last sentence is actually rather sane; don’t force your bigotry on other people on the day that is already leaning towards the non-bigoted side.
4/11/2012 12:15:54 PM
#1391411
DarkfireTaimatsu
Counterpoint: Supporting the day of silence got me hugs from a girl with black lipstick. =D
4/11/2012 12:35:59 PM
#1391422
Old Viking
Thus passeth another interval in Linda's tiny brain.
4/11/2012 1:03:38 PM
#1391458
"It’s totally unnecessary to stop bullying and prevent harm to students..."
That's it! I hereby revoke your humanity license! You have crossed the Moral Event Horizon and become a Complete Monster! Now, go do the world a favor and die in a fire!
4/11/2012 2:49:46 PM
#1391464
JSS
And here come ten rebuttals...
1) That's your own personal belief system which cannot be forced on our entire free nation, not a real reason.
2) But it doesn't encourage homosexual experimentation. It encourages treating gay people with dignity and recognizing the challenges that secretly gay oriented people go through. An idea that seems to be lost on you.
3) And yet you guys still find your way out of the "peer pressure and intimidation" to promote your views in the 'Day of "Truth"/Diologue'.
4) Then again, this is just the pot calling the kettle black.
5) Well, stopping the bullying of gays kind of involves treating them with basic human dignity, despite their being gay. I realize this is a challenge for you Linda...
6) "This person is evil, he violates god and he's inferior to the rest of you. But to all who tease him, cut it out." Yeah, that'll work.
7) And yet, you yourself cry persecution for your beliefs, despite them being harmful to the mental health of gay people. Irony is fun isn't it?
8) I imagine if the same scenario occurred involving a staunchly anti-gay teacher, you wouldn't be complaining in the slightest so this really is a moot point.
9) Maybe that's because not all gays are promiscuous sex addicts who enjoy acts that could get them killed? Homosexuality does not mean promiscuity or anal sex, as much as you and your deception would like people to think so.
10) Once again, the weeping of the violins. You're mad that the other side has utilized their freedom of speech to promote an idea you don't personally approve of, but of course, they're silent, which makes your complaining even more inappropriate. Grow up, or please, stay home. The air's much fresher without staunchly anti-gay activists.
4/11/2012 3:17:15 PM
#1391469
You know I think the 'Day of silence would be better observed not with silence but by a hundred thousand voices crying out in unison "What's the big fucking deal, bitch?"
4/11/2012 3:50:41 PM
#1391475
John
You need to be more explicit about exactly what you're condemning. Are you condemning:
(a) homosexuality itself, or
(b) protecting homosexuals from assaulting, discriminating against or bullying or telling anyone else they shouldn't assault, discriminate or bully homosexuals?
The Bible condones condemning (a). But no religion condones condemns (b). If you're objecting to merely telling people to leave homosexuals alone, then you need to stop reading Leviticus 20:13 and reread Luke chapter 6.
4/11/2012 4:14:09 PM
#1391482
tracer
I'm not a very big fan of DOS either.
It's built around a 16-bit segmented memory model with no address protection. I'm glad Microsoft finally replaced it with Windows NT.
4/11/2012 4:39:53 PM
#1391496
tranz2deep
Reading the question why Xians are increasingly strident and hateful of "teh ghey", in several posts, I feel I should point out recent events:
First off; over the last couple of decades, religious figures and politicians who were "counseled" away from homosexual behavior (often married) have backslid and been caught engaging in stealthy homosexual acts, often while ranting most powerfully against homosexuality. There's news stories Online about it, look it up.
Second; the leading scientist who had written a paper about sufficiently motivated homosexuals changing their sexuality has looked at the results over time and asked that the paper be officially recanted, taking even the semblance of scientific plausibility out from under the "ex-gay" movement.
Finally, the overreaching and relentless drive to unify people against an enemy so more will identify themselves as Christian is running aground against reality checks. Lacking the "eebil Commies" and "satanic ragheads", the only easy targets left are two traditional groups to whip on--homosexuals and women.
4/11/2012 5:16:30 PM
#1391512
Alencon
This is Linda Harvey. One of the most outspoken homophobes in the country.
I've found it's quite enjoyable to simply ignore her.
4/11/2012 6:06:56 PM
#1391515
Alessia
(...acting like straight people have no risks with their relations? And I have a teacher who's gay. No one cares...he doesn't need permission to tell us that.)
4/11/2012 6:26:53 PM
#1391545
Fundies Make Me Sick
Here are the real reasons why Christians (Fundies) refuse to honor the Day of Silence.
1. They hate homosexuals.
2. They think that bullying and killing homosexuals is acceptable.
3. They participate in the bullying and killing of homosexuals (explains #2)
4. They think that homosexuals are nothing but lustful, subhuman deviants.
5. They are sickening, evil wastes of life who have no hearts and blindly worship a book instead of Christ.
There you go Linda Harvey. Fixed your list for you. You can off yourself now.
4/11/2012 7:32:09 PM
#1391549
dynaboyj
Please, substitute "Christians" for "fundies" or "overly religious Christians" or something. I get the point, but some new people don't.
4/11/2012 8:06:26 PM
#1391571
Lotus-Thing
"It’s totally unnecessary to stop bullying and prevent harm to students"
Regardless of what this person is or is not promoting, the above statement reads very differently from the way I think they actually meant it to read.
Dude, Linda, learn to communicate clearly!
4/11/2012 10:02:24 PM
#1391576
Sylvana
I think the part that bugs me the most in this rant is point 10. Not only are they just railing against homosexuality like always but they complain that on this day of silence they cant go and witness to homosexuals. So basically they are saying because people are using a day of silence to recognize bullying that leads people to kill themselves they are not allowed to go forth and bully homosexuals with their witnessing on that day. They make me sick. They don't even realize that their actions are the ones that cause homosexual kids to kill themselves.
4/12/2012 12:02:07 AM
#1391586
\m/>_<\m/
define:
Day of Silence
immoral, God-dishonoring behavior
social justice”
“tolerance,”
child corruption.
sexual immorality,
Christian doctrine (which one? there's 1200+)
self-censoring their First Amendment rights. (how?)
nurture prejudiced, hostile and bigoted attitudes against Christians (just showing the persecution complex)
educational malpractice
deceit
untruthful and ungodly
moral objections
deviant
lifestyle risks
salvation
God-honoring
God
jeez! feels like i ripped half of that post to be defined adequately!
n.5 is particularly frightening, as yes bullying needs to be stopped.
the tl;dr version:
waarbagle, persecution complex, bigotry, teh geyz, icky, give god some major head, prozelytize (sp? i've got a doubt on the 2 z's)
4/12/2012 1:42:47 AM
#1391635
ggggg
Get raped, Linda Harvey, you pro-bullying cunt.
4/12/2012 6:52:53 AM
#1391643
Doubting ThomasStay home that day, and choose to witness on another, where perhaps you will have a fair chance of being heard.
Yeah, because Christians NEVER have the chance to get their point across:
4/12/2012 7:17:05 AM
#1391644
SpukiKitty
@Mister Spak
Don't say "nigger" OR put it in quotes! Damn! YOU ARE ONE DENSE IDIOT!
Other than that, I agree with ya 100%.
Why do you insist on using the word "nigger"...and FORGET to put quotes around it...seeing that you're being "tongue-in-cheek" & all?
Otherwise, the word is "blacks", "black people", "African American" or "Afro-American".
"Nigger" is a slur used by inferior, subhuman bigots...you are not an inferior subhuman bigot...therefore your humorous, ironic, joking, tongue in cheek use of "nigger" SHOULD HAVE QUOTATIONS FROM NOW ON!!!!
YOU WILL US QUOTES!
4/12/2012 7:19:49 AM
#1391663
@ ggggg
Dude, seriously not cool.
4/12/2012 8:01:01 AM
#1391685
Rat of Steel
( \m/> <\m/ )
"prozelytize (sp? i've got a doubt on the 2 z's)"
The first Z should be an S. The second Z is correct, though.
4/12/2012 9:18:16 AM
1 2 3