"We wouldn't need Intelligent Design if it weren't needed for defense against people with an agenda using science to "disprove" religion."
You certainly needed 'Intelligent Design' in Kitzmiller vs. Dover. And look what happened there?
'cdesign proponentsist' ring any bells? 'I.D.'s most educated proponent, Michael Behe made his - and thus the defendant's - case a complete laughingstock.
"The "proof" of human evolution is tenuous at best and there's a reason it's called a theory."
Judge John E. Jones III would like a word with you. As a result of Behe's 'informed' evidence & testimony, he found for the plaintiffs. As a result, the teaching of 'I.D., and thus by definition Creationism in all accredited educational establishments in the US, became illegal and unconstitutional
PROTIP: John E. Jones is a Conservative Christian. He was personally appointed to the Federal bench by George Dumbya Bush - a Conservative Christian who believes in Creationism. Dumbya was voted in - twice - by the Religious Right, who believe in Creationism.
Thus, I'm afraid that it's you & your ilk, Homosexual Frenzy (closet case, anyone? Not so's you'd notice...!) who - via your own agenda - has destroyed your own educational agenda. It's all your fault that, as a result of Kitzmiller vs. Dover, Creationism is lies, and Evolution is fact.
The law says so.
"It's been my experience that those pushing hardest for the acceptance of "evolution" are almost exclusively homosexuals bent on "disproving" the bible and removing the foundation of society's values (especially that part that doesn't accept homosexuals)."
I'm all for Evolution being promoted - it is fact, after all (not taking into account KvD, there's the shitloads of evidence that takes Evolution out of the realms of mere 'theory', and puts it solidly in the fact-based world we call Reality.) I'm an Atheist. I'm a straight man. I'm not the only one who thinks like me, neither. I'm also pro-LGBT.
I love the smell of annihilated arguments in the morning. Smells like... victory.