1 2 3
Homosexuality isn't a choice. If you think it is, try it sometime.
11/17/2010 11:22:10 AM
Stop whining, this issue will not affect your daily life in any way.
11/17/2010 11:50:46 AM
So basically it's a human rights violation because some people find it icky. Right. Well I find digested food to be icky so nobody can eat. Except, there's a problem: there's no basic human right to not be offended/disgusted.
11/17/2010 12:21:07 PM
War is Peace, Fredom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.
11/17/2010 12:45:01 PM
I keep hearing about the original definition. What is it? When was it formulated? By whose authority?
11/17/2010 12:46:10 PM
You don't have the right to deny other people their rights, dipshit.
11/17/2010 1:10:14 PM
Divorce would disenfranchise it far more than homosexual marriage would. And how is it discriminatory if it means they have the same rights we do? or are you a poe Jim?
11/17/2010 1:16:21 PM
Inalienable rights are not subject to your prejudice or vote. They are inalienable.
11/17/2010 1:34:17 PM
The homosexual marriage movement is an attack on bigotry in the name of human rights. It seeks to disenfranchise voters on a definition of marriage that only benefits themselves and to force unwilling citizens to have the same rights as those icky people.
11/17/2010 2:15:23 PM
So, in other words "Let's deny people rights because they are icky!"
11/17/2010 3:00:11 PM
Short version: Stop intoleratin' my intolerance!
11/17/2010 3:34:18 PM
It's like he just threw nasty-sounding words together.
Homosexuals are discouraging the penile system by way of hurling jowels at unwed teenage mothers, which discharges people to communistically indulge in venereal diseases!
11/17/2010 4:15:33 PM
The, pick one (women's suffrage/black equality) movement is an attack on human rights in the name of human rights. It seeks to disenfranchise (white, male) voters on the legal definition of personal worth and force unwilling (white, male) citizens to provide discriminatory benefits and subsidies to people that most white males find to be disgusting and damaging.
11/17/2010 4:36:17 PM
force unwilling citizens to provide discriminatory benefits
What "discriminatory benefits and subsidies"? Married people already enjoy "discriminatory benefits and subsidies". All gay couples are asking for is to get the same "discriminatory benefits and subsidies" marries couples already have.
It seeks to disenfranchise voters on the legal definition of marriage
In the US, voters are always "disenfranchised" when they attempt to vote for things that violate the Constitution. If you don't like it, change the Constitution. Good luck with that.
11/17/2010 5:33:54 PM
Seeing as some of the rights homosexual partners are being denied are bought and paid for by these people themselves, you are full of shit.
And enough of the "gay is a choice" bullshit. If it were a choice, there would be fewer of them since many gays despise the feelings they experience, particularly those brainwashed by bigoted or fundamentalist families.
11/17/2010 5:36:36 PM
This isn't a fringe thing so much as a central part of the de facto current GOP platform: mob rule (that is, absolute totalitarian rule of any 50%+1 voting majority) has been redefined as a human right.
11/17/2010 6:24:52 PM
11/17/2010 9:09:49 PM
Blah blah, wah wah, fuck you.
11/17/2010 9:33:36 PM
These same old tired arguments were used about inter-ethnic and inter-religion marriages. Society didn't end when those happened, and won't if same sex couples are allowed to legally marry.
11/17/2010 10:53:30 PM
"force unwilling citizens to provide discriminatory benefits and subsidies for a lifestyle choice most find to be disgusting and damaging"
11/18/2010 2:33:16 AM
The USA != an Ochlocracy.
Btw I learned a new word today because of this post. Thank you #1227407, I looked up the term 'mob rule' because of you. :D
11/18/2010 4:32:23 AM
"It seeks to disenfranchise voters on the legal definition of marriage"
See, this doesn't make sense. This is more of the " not letting me persecute others in the name of my beliefs is persecution!"
I hate you. I hate your friends.
11/18/2010 5:28:46 AM
The homosexual marriage movement is an attack on human rights in the name of human rights.
Sense, it makes none.
It seeks to disenfranchise voters on the legal definition of marriage and to force unwilling citizens to provide discriminatory benefits and subsidies for a lifestyle choice most find to be disgusting and damaging.
I have to pay taxes for people like you even though I think you're "disgusting and damaging."
11/18/2010 1:27:23 PM
11/18/2010 3:24:39 PM
I'm curious how anyone can be disenfranchised of a definition.
To quote the sublime Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
11/19/2010 2:39:40 AM
1 2 3