1 2 3 4
In sea horses, it's the males that carry the egss to maturity and give birth.
8/31/2010 7:55:31 AM
Well gee, why stop there. If evolution is true, then we should all be born pregnant, like tribbles!
8/31/2010 8:01:33 AM
More chlorine in the gene pool!
8/31/2010 8:02:31 AM
You don't just evolve something because it is needed.
Evolution is ad hoc. It works with what is already there.
And I was under the impression that sea horse males technically birth their children.
For explanations as to why only female mammals give birth and not male mammals, please go to biology class.
8/31/2010 8:06:27 AM
If creationism is true, why did God create creationists with less sense than a rock?
8/31/2010 8:10:22 AM
...because God designed only a female can give birth!!
Did you know male sea horses are the ones who give birth? The female lays her eggs in the male where they are then fertilised, and when small sea horses are ready to pop out, they do so. From the male.
And if we put up this hypothetical scenario where sex gets both the male and the female pregnant, then they would be very helpless during that pregnancy. Have you ever seen a pregnant woman close to giving birth? Now imagine all adults of a species running about like that... in nature.
Yes, I do know that humans don't breed every year, but most animals do.
And if emperor penguins were to do something retarded like have both the males and the females lay eggs, then they'd surely all die out since they are dependant on having two parents take care of one egg. One more egg, and either the parents would die of starvation because noone came to take over the incubation for them, or they'd neglect at least one of the eggs, making both of them laying completely pointless.
8/31/2010 8:15:30 AM
First, some animals can do both - earthworms, for example, each have both sexes (but they don't have sex with themselves - they find another worm and the corresponding parts hook up).
Second, sexual reproduction is favored by evolution because it allows exchanging and mixing genes.
Third, since it takes two to reproduce anyway, there's probably not much advantage to having both able to give birth.
Fourth, with some animals, males are relatively rare, especially when food supplies are short. It wouldn't be an advantage to have males tied up with carrying babies.
8/31/2010 8:29:24 AM
"First, some animals can do both - earthworms, for example, each have both sexes (but they don't have sex with themselves - they find another worm and the corresponding parts hook up)."
'Silvio Berlusconi's the sort of man who, if you told him to 'go fuck himself', he'd give it a try.'
8/31/2010 8:45:50 AM
You're too stupid to live. Please, don't breed.
8/31/2010 8:49:40 AM
And the prize for the stupidest argument ever goes to...
8/31/2010 9:59:02 AM
GO FUCK YOURSELF
..........someone had to say it!
8/31/2010 10:17:20 AM
If creation is true, why do these fucktard Christians even need a brain?
8/31/2010 10:20:21 AM
Seahorses. Back to school for you.
8/31/2010 10:32:36 AM
Sex Education fail
8/31/2010 10:38:59 AM
If you think evolution is true, then can you explain why only the female gender can reproduce??
I think evolution is true, but I can't explain why only the female gender can reproduce. No one can. Males also reproduce.
8/31/2010 10:58:25 AM
You're about as bright as this guy.
Oh wait, that's me.
8/31/2010 11:43:04 AM
But this will never happen because God designed only a female can give birth!!
So is your argument "evolution is wrong because it isn't smarter than God?" Because if God created life, He obviously didn't think male mammals giving birth was such a hot idea either.
8/31/2010 11:44:14 AM
Ugh! My head now hurts from the stupid of that first line alone. >_<
8/31/2010 11:47:27 AM
Well, for starters, that's what "gender" means. A lot of species are not gendered at all--snails and worms are hermaphrodites, and most protists and bacteria have no gender or sexual reproduction at all!
Why, it's almost as though sexual reproduction evolved over time, with the DNA donors (male) and incubators (female) becoming gradually more specialized over time!
8/31/2010 11:53:57 AM
If you are an adult, then why aren't you able to form complete sentences?
A pregnant female is very vulnerable, and in the latter stages she's ungainly. She needs someone to guard her and help her.
If both can give birth, then both can also die in childbirth. It's more efficient for one male to be able to impregnate many females, than for both sexes to be "occupied" for nine months.
And there are species where the male carry the offspring, actually.
I thought God was the creator, not Jesus.
Easy: you don't put all your eggs in one basket. Males have the sperm-bank and the ejaculating device, females have the incubator and the ovaries. Both are needed and both need to take care of each other.
Oh, and I don't think evolution is "true". It's an established fact, end of story.
8/31/2010 12:30:06 PM
I passed out and hit my head so White Shooting owes me an ER payment.
8/31/2010 12:31:02 PM
Then... why didn't God design both sexes to reproduce?
8/31/2010 12:40:30 PM
Nature knew men would snivel about giving birth and women wouldn't.
8/31/2010 12:47:13 PM
8/31/2010 1:23:26 PM
Wow, that's a bunch of stupid. Umm, I know that you will not take a biology class because of evilution but you really, really, really need one.
Before you grow up and get married - find a kind person to teach you about sex.
Of course, last but not least, EVOLUTION AND REPRODUCTION DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!
@ Doctor Whom - Awesome, never thought to say that.
@ EMT420 - just blew Dr. Pepper out my nose. Thanks.
8/31/2010 1:26:38 PM
1 2 3 4