Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 74576

Yes, if you are an atheist-evolutionist it might be better to deny the information-bearing nature of DNA altiogether.

But it is becoming painfully clear that the "simple cell" is an holistic information-processing and communication system of unparalleled complexity.

The "science" journals are staffed with ideological Darwinists who despise any criticism of their "theory". One can't even get a mildly critical letter to the editor of PNAS published let alone a manuscript.

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS is what I have to say to you! Darwinism is kept alive through censorship.

FREE SCIENCE! REGIME CHANGE NOW!

Darwin's Nemesis, Pharyngula 64 Comments [7/24/2010 3:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 56
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
#1185345
Mister Spak

" One can't even get a mildly critical letter to the editor of PNAS published let alone a manuscript. "

That's because PNAS isn't mad magazine - they don't print letters from idiots.

7/26/2010 5:31:44 AM
#1185490
Reverend Jeremiah

"Yes, if you are an atheist-evolutionist it might be better to deny the information-bearing nature of DNA altiogether. "

Double FAIL - Evolutionists do not have to be atheists..and Christians dont get to step up and claim DNA as proof they are right until they can show in the Bible they had knowledge of it before hand...and they cannot.

But it is becoming painfully clear that the "simple cell" is an holistic information-processing and communication system of unparalleled complexity.

"holistic information-processing and communication system of unparalleled complexity" LOL, wut?! Is this sort of like putting a cel on a slide, poking it open, letting its guts run all over the place, and sayingthat evolution is a failure because the cell cant put itself back together and make more cells.? How about I put an empty jar on a desk and pray that something be intelligently designed in it?

The "science" journals are staffed with ideological Darwinists who despise any criticism of their "theory". One can't even get a mildly critical letter to the editor of PNAS published let alone a manuscript.

Yeah, how dare those science journals staff themselves with..you know...actuall scientists. They should be staffed with fundy creationists who dont know dick about science, but claim bible verses are "science". Once you have that then you fundies can do what you always like to do..censor all opposing view points.

The rest of your opinion is just childish and ignorant.

7/26/2010 3:14:55 PM
#1185542
Abdul Alhazred

"unparalleled complexity"

Allright. I'll put it in the gentle way:

Your dumb.


btw: "atheist-evolutionist"

Not all evolutionists are atheist and there are also some atheist who do not believe in evolution (seriously!)

7/26/2010 5:43:35 PM
#1185543
JohnTheAtheist

That made me laugh.

This guy might demand that astrology get taught along side astronomy.

7/26/2010 5:46:45 PM
#1185629
Tolpuddle Martyr

Prove it!

7/27/2010 4:29:52 AM
#1185657
Anon-e-moose

"FREE SCIENCE! REGIME CHANGE NOW!"

Two for one: President Barack Obama (the Regime Change we so badly needed after the eight-year nighmare that was George Dumbya Bush) awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Prof. Stephen Hawking (who, as with all scientists, freely make their findings available in books found in libraries, and their papers via websites):



And if you are the 'Nemesis' of Darwin, as you claim, then you haven't done a very good job of being so. Proved by the fact his world-changing discoveries earned himself a position on the back of our currency:



Not so much a 'Nemesis' of the great Charles Darwin, more like a bridge-dwelling, goat-molesting troll. And that's all you'll ever be.

@Zits

"Does anyone smell Tyrannosaurus shit here?"

'Now that is one big pile of shit.'

-Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum), "Jurassic Park"

7/27/2010 7:24:58 AM
#1185816
Brenz

Perhaps you can't get a letter published because you end it in all caps spouting unrelated catchphrases.

John Wilkes Booth thought he was fighting tyranny, too.

7/27/2010 11:48:30 AM
#1186704
Iczer-Four

Hostes alienigeni me abducxerunt. Qui annus est?

7/29/2010 10:42:10 PM
#1187789
blayzekohime

I don't think they understand that scientists with competing theories don't compete in the same sense that religions or political parties do.

8/2/2010 3:05:41 PM
#1309615
Mr White Keys

What the hell is "holistic information processing" supposed to mean?

7/14/2011 11:45:26 AM
#1309620
Randomwolf42

Darwinists? You mean the British from that steampunk novel "Leviathan"? Yeah, it was the Darwinists vs. the Clankers, or something. It was a good book, but it was fiction. You know, like another book we all know...

7/14/2011 12:07:31 PM
#1359804
Quantum Mechanic

Awww
What's the matter?
Your abstract written in crayon didn't impress the editors at Nature?

12/22/2011 7:45:18 AM
#1521366


I sense butthurt

3/30/2013 5:36:47 PM
#1521375
Blarghonius

Just because your tiny brain cannot comprehend something does not mean it's incomprehensible.

3/30/2013 5:51:37 PM
1 2 3