...Wait, what?!

This is either a typical YouTube troll, or DaaanceYouLoser is trying to compete with Carico for "Most WTF made up in one post."

12/31/2009 10:49:58 PM

We have a VERY late contender here. >.>

12/31/2009 11:50:59 PM

Antichrist

No abortion doctor forces an abortion on a woman. And if what they do is rape, does that mean my GP rapes me once a year?

But the name makes me think troll out to pull peoples strings.

1/1/2010 12:01:26 AM

smartz

Yes, because we have a plague of abortion bandits, forcing pregnant women to have abortions in back alleys.

"DaaanceYouLoser" is a very fitting handle for a loser like you.

1/1/2010 12:27:28 AM

Vegetable Rights Activist

I don't think there is a way to intelligently respond to this, so here is some random nattering.

BLEEBETIY-AGRGAC-SHOOP-SHOPP-CLIKC!




And yet, that still made more sense than Daaance's post.

1/1/2010 12:41:41 AM

louislois

Lying for Jesus.

1/1/2010 12:52:13 AM

Musicalbookworm

Put down the crack pipe!

1/1/2010 12:53:02 AM

katie5000

So abortion doctors rape and sexually assault women? That's news to me. Funny you don't hear more about that in the papers or something, no?

1/1/2010 12:56:31 AM

Tallyho

[CITATION REALLY FUCKING NEEDED]

1/1/2010 4:50:56 AM

aaa

You are a bad liar.

1/1/2010 4:52:42 AM

LDM

George Carlin nailed it in that clip.

1/1/2010 5:07:23 AM

Swede

Huh? Here in Sweden we get information about sex, contraceptives, pregnancies and abortions in school; in Biology (boys and girls together).
More information can be found in libraries and from the maternal care units (they take care of all women, not just mothers, it's like "gynaecology light" or "pre-gynaecology").

Performing abortions is just one small part of the job of gynaecologists. Their main focus is to keep women healthy, and to make sure that the mother-to-be and her embryo/fetus go through the pregnancy alive and well.

1/1/2010 6:44:57 AM

NiggaStatus

Those damn abortion rapists!

1/1/2010 1:59:52 PM

WMDKitty

That's just plain wrong. No. Dude, it's beyond wrong and light-years into "I pulled this out of my ass" territory.

1/1/2010 5:16:52 PM

I always thought that first the woman got pregnant and then she considered having an abortion.

1/2/2010 12:58:33 PM

Angua

Yeah, you got DaaanceYouLoser. I'll have to admit it, every pro-choice person was a complete and total liar and every doctor who ever performed abortions was a rapist who habitually lied to his patients. (All doctor's are male apparently . . . )

You've uncovered the conspiracy. Just how did you figure it out? The fact that no one in the medical profession would realize what was going on and be disgusted enough to try to put a stop to it makes the whole thing seem so preposterous, ridiculous, unreasonable, and improbable that I thought no one would ever guess.


I get the feeling that DaaanceYouLoser doesn't just wear a tinfoil hat, but wears an entire suit of tinfoil armor.

1/2/2010 11:28:57 PM

DaaanceYouLoser

Oh, if only people here realised just how right they are.

Yes, you WOULD think you'd hear about it in the papers more, wouldn't you? Perhaps if the entire US media was more than a brainwashing device, you would hear about it. However, media or not, these cases are still documented from courts and hospitals, and the rare newspaper that does report it.

Unfortunately most here refuse to actually do anything about their complete ignorance and research it themselves (this can be done by visiting google.com and searching the words "abotion," "doctor," "assaults," and "patients"). But if you want the real documented facts try books like Crutcher's "Lime 5" which was particularly exposing, not to mention used hospital and court records as sources for its hundreds of cases of abortion doctors harassing, assaulting, raping, and yes, even killing their patients either through carelessness or malpractise.

I recall one doctor who was charged with the rape of over 20 different women, all his most attractive patients; it was his interns who reported him to police, noticing that whenever an attractive young patient was anesthetised he would demand to be "alone" with her in the room.

In another case, a woman came to an abortion clinic to have her unborn child done away with, and after taking the relaxant drugs, she gave birth to a living, breathing child. Since she was drugged and unable to physically resist, she told the doctor that she had changed her mind about the abortion, but completely ignoring her he simply cut the child loose, smashed it on the floor, and hid the body in a shoebox. It was his interns, too, who witnessed it and phoned the police.

Other comments here I just find hilarious. I'm "lying for Jesus" now am I? Despite the fact that I never once mentioned Jesus or any facet of religious expression in my argument? Assuming that is no different from me making the suggestion that everyone who posts here is posting for Satanism. However feel free to further make all those hilarious and witty comments this site is so very famous for, I understand it's part of the schtick.

1/3/2010 3:34:36 AM

Sister Immaculata

Mr. You Loser,

Oh, my dear Mr. You Loser.

That's all.

1/3/2010 3:41:58 AM

Everything in his post is fanatic pro-"life" propaganda. Unbelievable. I've never actually had the opportunity to say this to one of you revolting anti-woman crusaders, so FUCK YOU. You are a fucking loser.

1/3/2010 4:04:05 AM

DaaanceYouLoser

So, you're just going to hand out your own sick propaganda and not even attempt to refute my point whatsoever? That's fine, whatever works for your kind of people. I don't really need to make personal attacks on people to reassure myself that I'm correct but I won't judge you if you do.

1/3/2010 10:21:51 AM

Godbuster

@ #1086372

They don't abort babies that well developed as you described in your obvious hoax.

Also making abortion illegal would make it easier for such crimes to be committed, as there are no official sources for the perpetrators to report to.

You say you're not lying for Jesus, but calling us all Satan worshippers pretty much confirms that, in conjunction with the obvious false tales you're spinning, yeah,

You're lying for Jesus.

1/4/2010 2:23:11 PM

DaaanceYouLoser

Godbuster,

Wow man, great job on your comprehension skills. My entire point was that claiming I am "lying for Jesus" would be the same as me making the assumption -- the probably incorrect assumption -- that you are motivated by Satanism. Somehow, you totally reversed what I said, whether indeliberately and thus unintelligently, or deliberately and thus deceptively.

And if you doubt that there has been a baby born and then killed in an abortion clinic, how about searching Google like a normal person?

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENZZ303&=&q=baby+born+killed+in+abortion+clinic&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Any other attempts you have for me?

1/4/2010 5:12:23 PM

Angua

Did I just post a sarcastic comment about how ridiculous this whole "evil abortion doctors" conspiracy theory thing was because it just makes no logical sense whatsoever and have DaaanceYouLoser say that there actually was a conspiracy and reconcile the fact that it makes no logical sense with the fact that the media is covering it up?

I hadn't even gotten so far as mentioning the mass media, but now that it's been mentioned . . .

First of all, the media would leap all over this story. You think that people wouldn't want to know about this sort of thing? Whichever reporter broke the news to the press would probably be applauded as one of the best investigative journalists of our time. There's sex, violence, conspiracy, and all sorts of things that would send ratings sky-rocketing. If the media is in on the conspiracy, why the hell would the media want to cover it up?



And secondly. anyone who doesn't believe that Fox News and conservative talk show hosts would be screaming about this nonstop were there even the slightest hint of evidence that this stupid conspiracy theory was real is clearly in need of a reality check.

1/4/2010 6:50:36 PM

Oh yes, it's all a huge conspiracy that nobody knows about but you, DYL.
I dare you to explain why, when my ex decided to abort (in the first week of her pregnancy, mind you), she was given a pill to take at home. She was never alone with the doctor - who was female, by the way.

Also, the only time a woman can get an abortion after the fetus is developed enough to survive outside the womb is in extreme emergency cases. So your "live baby" bit is an obvious lie.
The fact that the only places that story runs is on tabloids like Daily Mail (who have run stories on UFOs, ffs) and fanatic pro-life sites alongside other debunked myths says quite a bit.

You're showing signs of paranoid delusion, DYL. I seriously suggest you see a doctor.

1/5/2010 12:33:47 AM

DaaanceYouLoser

No, the media wouldn't be "all over" this story, because if you haven't noticed there are hidden interests in the mass media. I won't go on to name precisely what those hidden interests are in this case, but if you deny the fact that there are, you're even more ignorant than I would have guessed. After all, you did actually suggest belief in the ridiculous myth that Fox, or any other news network, is "right-wing," so there's really no telling.

Second, I was actually dismayed to find that this particular story has been removed from all three of the mainstream news websites it was published on the day it had happened. Whether this is because old news stories are automatically removed from publication online, or because they were pulled to protect hidden interests, I'm not certain. However, back when this was actually news, it was published on quite a few mainstream news websites. I still have the addresses but they return a 404.

Your point beyond this I must be failing to grasp. I've shown you hundreds of references amongst conservative media, with a simple Google search. So there is tons of coverage of it. What is your point precisely?

At any rate, here's the updated story on CNN. Will that satisfy, or does it have to be from a pro-abortion website?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/06/florida.abortion/

As for you, little #1087905, are you really going to make the suggestion that information from biased sources can not be reliable? I certainly hope not, because ironically that would include every news source that has ever published so much as a word. I guess you don't realise that every mainstream news network in the US is run and moderated by a jewish minority (and don't even bother calling that a conspiracy theory or mocking the statement, it's just a plain fact). Therefore every time you watch TV what you are seeing is what the same few people in power want you to see. In essence, yes, it IS a conspiracy, a tiny number of people with agendas determining what information you can and can't know. So considering that, the idea that news about abortion published on an anti-abortion website is innately unreliable is naïvety at its finest.

You're treating abortion clinics and their "doctors" as fanatics treat their gods. If you would for a moment examine your own arguments, you would see that what you are suggesting is that every abortion and every abortionist is perfectly protocol, humane and infallibly righteous. You think the average abortionist would deny a nice big paycheque to abort a baby that's "past his due date"? Guess again. As is easily demonstrable, it happens all the time, probably daily, sure enough as the pope is Catholic.

Further yet, while you faithfully and with great zeal defend abortionists and their slimy industry, you seem to maintain the attitude that I have suggested that every last abortion doctor on the face of the planet will drug, rape and murder you. This is clearly not the case. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and even a murderer can kill with sincere righteous conviction, as would be a much more relevant analogy in this case.

Here are some useful beginner tips for discussion, they helped me when I was in high school, perhaps they will help you. Try forming an argument that:

-is based on evidenced information, not sarcasm and rhetoric.
-does not involve your personal emotions, but rather remains realistic and fair.
-does not attack or demean others. This is known by the Latin "ad hominem," and is generally recognised as a telltale sign of discomfort or insecurity.

Happy arguing!!

1/5/2010 3:41:38 AM