Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 67500

Ya well heres my throy. The whole ape to man evolution thing. ITS MENTAL! it could be they were normal but used objects to change their appearence eventualy re-forming their skeletons when they die. Or God made a different type of human that eventualy went extinct. Look at the ancien myans-thier skeletons were different but still not evolution.

Michael Koretoff, Teach Science in Science class Facebook Group 79 Comments [11/12/2009 12:48:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 70
Submitted By: YesNoMaybe
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4
#1055493
aaa

How old are you? If you are older than me, please bang your head against the nearest wall until your brain starts working.

11/12/2009 3:35:19 PM

#1055495
Turtle

The whole ape to man evolution thing. ITS MENTAL!
---

And the Little Cro-Magnon That Could said 'I think I can, I think I can*' and gave birth to a child slightly more suited to his environment!

*or the equivalent thereof.

11/12/2009 3:36:59 PM

#1055512
Canadiest

Yeah, South Americans aren't Caucasions, because they're South Americans. Genius that. Their unmixed relatives today are the same. This is evolution, regional simularity, what the theory claimed from it's roots with Darwin.

"used objects to change their appearence eventualy re-forming their skeletons when they die"

Did this guy claim we altered the bones of our dead?

11/12/2009 3:47:26 PM

#1055514
evilred

*headdesk*

11/12/2009 3:48:44 PM

#1055524
Marsten

"Look at the ancien myans-thier skeletons were different but still not evolution."

Yes, differing development across varying ecological and geographical environments and through mutational development within racial groups has produced slightly differing physical characteristics across different 'cultures', yes. Well done for noticing that.

That's evolution.

Yes, it is.

Deal.

11/12/2009 3:59:18 PM

#1055549
GigaGuess

So they were people that changed, or were different from us...but not evolution. Gotcha.

11/12/2009 4:24:38 PM

#1055568
Eden

Sure,
every imaginable scenario that keeps you from admitting that the ToE is true and young earth creationism is false ;)

11/12/2009 4:40:29 PM

#1055600
MK

Internet Word Salad of the Year.

11/12/2009 5:12:24 PM

#1055614
pete

* Homo sapiens
* †Homo habilis
* †Homo erectus
* †Homo antecessor
* †Homo ergaster
* †Homo heidelbergensis
* †Homo neanderthalensis
* †Homo floresiensis

11/12/2009 5:29:40 PM

#1055618
Vince

you lost me at "throy"

good thing to. the rest of it was nothing but down hill.

11/12/2009 5:34:09 PM

#1055636
Reverend Jeremiah

Your "throy" sucks donkey dick, and doesnt deserve to be in Biology class except as an example of how people do not understand Biology.

11/12/2009 5:53:55 PM

#1055637
I read about the afterlife

You know, when you're announcing a new scientific (I use the term loosely) theory, it does well to actually spell the word "theory" right.

11/12/2009 5:55:33 PM

#1055648
Reverend Jeremiah

"Ya well heres my throy."
*SIGH*..what is you "throy"?
The whole ape to man evolution thing.
Ummm..the biological definition of "man" IS Ape. We share ALL of the zoological features and genetics up to a small percentage. We humans didnt "come" from apes. We ARE apes you biologically challenged primate!
ITS MENTAL!
Right, because you didnt study it, it must be insane. Its not mental, you are just ignorant and cant wrap your simple mind around complex science.
it could be they were normal but used objects to change their appearence eventualy re-forming their skeletons when they die.
And you were saying Biology was mental? Di you just pull that out of your ass to challenge hundreds of years of people who FAR exceed your mental capacity? You cant even spell theory, much less understand what it means!
Or God made a different type of human that eventualy went extinct.
Right! Because a perfect, all knowing creator GOD who can see the future and has plans for its creations cannot stop one of its SPECIAL creations from extincting itself. Proof that your God exists or you are just pulling it out of your ass as a conjecture!
Look at the ancien myans-thier skeletons were different but still not evolution.
You dont even understand zoological properties that relate Humans with Chimps and Gorillas and Orangutans, yet you are going to point out Myan skulls, whuch you dont have, to prove they are NOT Homo Sapiens Sapiens? Do you see the shared traits between you and your family as compared to another person and their family? Then you see evolution. Do you see the shared traits between Humans and Chimps as compared to Humans and fish? Then you understand common ancestry.

Your "throy" sucks dirty donkey dork!

11/12/2009 6:18:10 PM

#1055700
werewolf

Isn't that your Mommy calling you for dinner? He's a good kid - just been dropped on his head too many times.

11/12/2009 7:36:02 PM

#1055745
MK

Aw c'mon, folks, throy him a bone here...

11/12/2009 8:36:26 PM

#1055754
Panz

You're not...you're not terribly bright...are you?

11/12/2009 8:54:44 PM

#1055786
Sasha

Yeah, well, I have a "throy" too, but I don't wave it around in public.

11/12/2009 9:37:38 PM

#1055789
John_in_Oz

That throy has potential.
To get us to believe it, you should work out how many different types of human God created that eventually went extinct. You could name those different types perhaps. We've lots of different fossilised skeletons; you could tell us which of your extinct groups each of those skeletons belonged to.
To be more plausible, you should arrange them in some reasonable order, say geological strata they're found in, or their age by potassium-argon or rubidium-strontium methods.
Once you've done that, all you need do is account for the appearance of transition, and the absence of modern groups from older times, and you're halfway there!

Or you could just sit on your arse while pronouncing "ITS MENTAL" and have people post your words to be pointed at and laughed at.

11/12/2009 9:48:32 PM

#1055821
Antichrist

Hold it, wasn't the fundie right below this one whining that we should stay out of groups we don't agree with?

Hypocrisy, thy name is fundie.

11/12/2009 10:45:18 PM

#1055827
Osiris

Humans are apes.
*Fundies head asplode*

11/12/2009 10:48:24 PM

#1055861
Clown

Yeah, there's a little thing called Occam's razor. Look it up.

11/13/2009 12:30:45 AM

#1055884
SleepNeed

Ya well heres my throy.

I count at least four errors in this sentence alone:

1) "Ya" usually means you or your, as is "see ya later." Yea is the proper word here.
2) No comma after "ya."
3) "Heres" is not a word. I assume you where going for "here's", the contraction of here is.
4) "Throy" is also not word. The word is spelled "theory."


The whole ape to man evolution thing.

At least two errors in this one:

1) It's a fragment sentence.
2) It's common ancestors, not a poof from apes to humans.


ITS MENTAL!


1) All caps.
2) Fragment sentence.


it could be they were normal but used objects to change their appearence eventualy re-forming their skeletons when they die.


1) The first word is not capitalized.
2) No explanation how objects could rearrange their skeletons.


Or God made a different type of human that eventualy went extinct.

There where other humanoids. But they where the chains along the path to Homo Sapiens Sapiens. I'll say one error for the sake of constancy

Look at the ancien myans-thier skeletons were different but still not evolution.

1) It's ancient, not ancien.
2+3) It should be Mayans. Note the a before the y and the name Mayans should be capitalized.
4) Mayans are still humans but they have differences due to environmental adaptation (aka evolution.) Just like my family is different than my fiancee's but we are both humans.

Let's see here, that's a total of fifteen (15) errors in 6 sentences.

11/13/2009 12:45:29 AM

#1055909


The mental issue applies rather to you...............unless you can claim ignorance on the subject.

11/13/2009 1:49:08 AM

#1055957
The L

Well, something here is mental.

11/13/2009 4:20:17 AM

#1055962
Mudak

@SleepNeed, you missed the fact that the "ITS" should really be "it's" (Ignore the propriety/impropriety of the caps for the purposes of this observation.)

11/13/2009 4:29:29 AM
1 2 3 4