1 2 3
#1103275
Wayte
I love how these people completely miss the concept of science...
1/25/2010 11:21:20 PM
#1103400
ecoline
Astute observation, and the exact reason that science works better than religion when it comes to practical applications.
'Course, I'd have some nits to pick re: the definition of "belief" vs. accepting a theory, and the mistaken impression that the theory of evolution aspires to being an origin story/moral compass/basis of a religion, like the bible does.
1/26/2010 5:51:40 AM
#1103563
Swede
I will trust the one that has been tested and tested and tested, not the one that is never allowed to be questioned.
If it has never been rewritten, then what are all these different versions? KJV is not 2000 years old, it's precisely 399 years old (according to Wikipeida).
1/26/2010 9:45:41 AM
#1103579
Anon-e-moose
Evolution. Rewritten & rewritten...
So? New evidence is always found, thus Darwin's original theory is contantly
updated to take into account said evidence which reinforces the facts about Evolution.
Facts being the operative word.
The Bible. 'It is written'. O RLY?:
http://www.tyndalearchive.com/Scriptures/index.htm
And that's just the
English versions. The KJV was edited. By a homosexual no less.
Your call, fundies.
1/26/2010 9:54:59 AM
#1138328
I'm going to trust the book on the right because it is rewritten and rewritten and rewritten and rewritten and rewritten, which means it is relavant to our present time, unlike that strange book with the cross on it.
3/25/2010 12:09:20 PM
#1138407
Anemone
I'd pick the book that's current and contains up to date scientific information. By the way, it's called the Origin of Species, dumb ass.
3/25/2010 3:11:22 PM
#1138411
David B.
Which value of pi are you going to trust?
The bible's?
Pi = 3
Or science's?
Pi = 22/7 355/113 103993/33102
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303820...
3/25/2010 3:20:48 PM
#1138420
David B.
Consistency, it's only a good thing if you're not always wrong.
3/25/2010 3:26:55 PM
#1138506
Amanda
The second one. At least they're updating it with current facts and theories.
3/25/2010 6:50:08 PM
#1154203
Evil Left-Wing Feminist
OH NOES
THEY'RE REVISING AND REVISING TO FIT NEW SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES
5/3/2010 6:32:46 AM
#1154280
Phisshy
Researchers and writers of scientific textbooks know when to suck it up when their first assumptions don't match the data.
But some fundies don't know how to take their ideological lumps and bruises like a man!
5/3/2010 9:43:19 AM
#1154474
D
Mirror awards anyone?
5/3/2010 4:50:16 PM
#1240363
Umm is the book on the right the correct answer?
1/2/2011 1:30:17 PM
#1241437
The Duelist
I prefer the one that's been proven over the one that's been thoroughly refuted by legions of historians and scholars, and tells you that selling your daughter as a sex slave and beating slaves to death is permissible, but homosexuality is an abomination(which has also been refuted).
1/4/2011 5:06:25 PM
#1241561
thatotherguy
Which one are you going to trust?
Evolution: it is revised, and improved, and revised...
OR...
Bible: "It is written" but then mistranslated and parts get stuck in from time to time even though they shouldn't be and ...
1/4/2011 11:50:16 PM
#1241582
Justanotheratheist
Consider how much the world has changed in 2000 years and then consider how a book that has not changed one iota in 2000 years can possibly be accurate.
Thinking people continue to grow mentally, that's why theories are revisited and opinions revised as new evidence comes to light. Clinging to a book that has remained constant for two millennia is not much different from a fully grown man trying to fit into the first set of baby clothes he ever wore.
1/5/2011 2:18:46 AM
#1296998
Sasori
SPOING!
6/7/2011 3:25:08 PM
#1297042
Moondog
"Why aren't women alloed to go to the stoning, Mum?"
"Because it's written, that's why!!!"
6/7/2011 7:16:19 PM
#1308349
Quantum Mechanic
It is forged.
You lose.
7/10/2011 6:18:31 AM
#1308561
apatheist
Wait... Hasn't the bible undergone a few dozen revisions too? Then there's the matter of lost in translation and it's undergone a few dozen of those two.
7/10/2011 5:57:42 PM
#1444727
Ebon
One changes to accommodate facts, the other doesn't.
9/7/2012 4:01:23 PM
#1469715
Quantum Mechanic
Babble's be re-forged countless times, liar.
11/14/2012 10:04:04 AM
#1470017
Sane people change their minds when they realize that they were wrong.
11/15/2012 6:51:51 AM
#1534821
Quantum Mechanic
Genesis contradicts itself at least 83 times.
Maybe a competent editor would have helped.
5/3/2013 12:31:11 PM
#1534884
Neither, because the only person who would write a book called "Evolution BELIEF" is some brain-dead fundie who thought he was clever, just like the only person who would write a book like the Bible is an ignorant sheep herder.
5/3/2013 5:33:22 PM
1 2 3