Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 65884

Yea Obambat I blame Clinton for 9-11 because he had the opportunity to stop Osama but didn't. His chicken shit ass blew up empty tents. There were many times Clinton had and fucked them up. You should thank Bush you ungrateful ass wipe, because since that horrible day we have yet to be attacked. Lets see what happens with the man child in office as he tries to make nice to the back stabbing murderous MOOOOOOOSLIM.

Dave, Moonbattery 39 Comments [9/22/2009 7:56:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 48
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
#1025577
Pookie


9/22/2009 8:03:02 PM

#1025578
dpareja

For a moment there I thought he was calling Obama a "back stabbing murderous MOOOOOOOSLIM."

9/22/2009 8:03:04 PM

#1025581
jsonitsac

Umm, maybe if you guys weren't so focused on who was sucking off Bill Clinton he could have fired more of those cruise missiles in Afghanistan with out worrying about being accused of "wagging the dog."

9/22/2009 8:04:01 PM

#1025582
Mrs. Antichrist

So, under that logic, we can blame Bush for the current economic crisis.

Both the Clinton and Bush administrations dropped the ball when it came to acting on the information they received pre 9/11. Blaming it all on one man is ridiculous. It certainly didn't help that Kennith Starr and Monica Lewinsky had the Clinton admin. busy with a stupid sex scandal, which definitely distracted them from doing their actual jobs -- running and protecting the country.

And don't forget, it's ultimately Bin Laden and Al Qaeda who decided to hatch the plan... they deserve more blame than anyone else.

As far as the economy goes, the Bush administration and the general public can blame themselves for that one. Obama and co. have made some mistakes in trying to repair the damage, but the recession wasn't caused by them -- it was already happening long before they took office.

9/22/2009 8:05:44 PM

#1025586
The FBI is controlling your thoughts via your toaster

Bush didn't stop Osama either.

9/22/2009 8:09:07 PM

#1025594
Mudak

Who says that we haven't been attacked since 9/11? There's the Anthrax Mailings a month later, followed by bombings in Bali, Madrid, London, and countless attacks on our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan...

9/22/2009 8:18:09 PM

#1025620
Thejebusfire

You should thank Bush you ungrateful ass wipe, because since that horrible day we have yet to be attacked.

What about the anthrax scare? What about all the attacks on Muslim and Hindu Americans afterwards? Or the bombings in the UK?



9/22/2009 8:43:30 PM

#1025650
GodotIsWaiting4U

Clinton likely WOULD have stopped him, but you assholes were up in his face the entire time about Monica Lewinsky.

We and Britain have both been attacked since 9/11.

Obama is not a manchild. You're thinking of Bush. Obama recognizes that Osama bin Laden =/= all of the Middle East, and that Islam is not, in and of itself, our enemy.

9/22/2009 9:11:29 PM

#1025652
The Skeptic Wept

@The FBI is controlling your thoughts via your toaster

"Bush didn't stop Osama either."

Much less even find him.

9/22/2009 9:14:00 PM

#1025669


POE

9/22/2009 9:29:11 PM

#1025672
Horsefeathers

"Yea Obambat I blame Clinton for 9-11 because he had the opportunity to stop Osama but didn't."

Your boy Bush invaded the wrong fucking country. I'd say that tops simply not taking the opportunity to capture him in the first place.

"His chicken shit ass blew up empty tents."

And Bush blew up pretty much everyone except the guy he was supposedly after. Again, I'd say that tops Clinton's actions.

"There were many times Clinton had and fucked them up."

Bush had nearly full support and cooperation from every major nation on the planet and squandered it. How much of a fuck up do you have to be to do that?

"You should thank Bush you ungrateful ass wipe, because since that horrible day we have yet to be attacked."

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

You'll also note that we weren't successfully attacked on such a massive scale until Bush was in office. See, I can play games like that too.

"Lets see what happens with the man child in office as he tries to make nice to the back stabbing murderous MOOOOOOOSLIM."

My, aren't you clever.

9/22/2009 9:35:11 PM

#1025677


Both fucked things up. Clinton: Launched an ineffectual attack that that was akin to a kid throwing a rock at a hornets nest, giving little thought to what might happen. Bush: Was the kid who came later, got stung, and proceeded to chop down the tree holding the nest (edit: and the four or five trees nearby), burned it (them), pissed on the ashes and then blew the whole thing to kingdom come with about a bazillion cherry bombs.

9/22/2009 9:38:03 PM

#1025693
AuraTwilight

Yea? Well Bush Sr. gave Saddam weapons, so fuck you.

9/22/2009 9:58:22 PM

#1025700
WMDKitty

What the hell? Bush was clearly the one who FAILED TO STOP THE TERRORISTS. The only backstabbers around are you Christians, who preach about loving your neighbor, but treat everyone like shit.

9/22/2009 10:04:35 PM

#1025753
aaa

Didn't the Reagan adminstration give weapons to the al-qaeda's predecessor during the 80's?

9/22/2009 11:08:01 PM

#1025763
Panz

But one's never happened on Obama's watch either

And waht's more he's gone further into his presidency than Bush without one


Your logic is gonna fall apart because of a very large problem. There've only been a few terror attacks on US soil..EVER.
Let's play with your logic a bit. By your logic, the great depression and the US Civil War were Republican fuckups because they happened on republican watches.

9/22/2009 11:28:55 PM

#1025765
Slater

Mrs. Antichrist "So, under that logic, we can blame Bush for the current economic crisis."

- Not really. Dave's logic is seriously flawed, while the logic that blames Bush for the financial crisis is real logic.

9/22/2009 11:31:02 PM

#1025780
omg wat

I can just see in my head the person who wrote this; sitting on his porch, polishing his shotgun, cursing at the darker-coloured folk passing by. "Ain't lettin' no MOOOSLIM ruun fer awffice. Bush rules!"

9/22/2009 11:47:31 PM

#1025790
RFP15

You know, after the WTC was attacked the first time, it was eight years before they were attacked again. Under this logic, you owe President Clinton a thank you.

9/23/2009 12:07:30 AM

#1025797
Orion

By this logic we can also blame the Bush Snr administration that handed weapons to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets which they later turned on Coalition forces.

By this logic we can also say Obama is absolutely fantastic because there have been no attacks on American soil since he came to office.

9/23/2009 12:14:26 AM

#1025809
Clown

Whaaat?

9/23/2009 12:25:44 AM

#1025841
Eden

So what did Bush do before 9/11?

If I remember correctly he not only did nothing about Osama Bin Laden before 9/11, but even invited a Taliban delegation into the white house, to talk to them about a gas pipeline that should be built through Afghanistan ;)

9/23/2009 1:30:24 AM

#1025910
Emma

The USA hasn't been attacked but Spain, Australia, the UK and India have been since...
Not to mention the terrorists that were British born kid that tried to blow up planes and are in jail thanks to British Intelligence..not American....

9/23/2009 4:41:18 AM

#1025913


wtf? I see a chance of a ctstdt/fstdt hybrid here....

9/23/2009 4:45:20 AM

#1025925
Grimesy

@ Emma: There have been attacks directed at Aus, but not on Australian soil.

9/23/2009 5:06:53 AM
1 2