1 2 3
#897766
emau99
So...no proof at all, then?
2/13/2009 1:57:23 PM
#897767
Imroy
Jesus probably never even existed. What proof do you have that he did?
2/13/2009 1:57:38 PM
#897776
Katsuro
Jesus not being in his tomb, ie no physical evidence of his existance, is not a great argument pal.
2/13/2009 2:00:56 PM
#897780
Illuminatalie
Of course Jesus is not in his tomb. He can walk through walls. But for some reason, they had to roll the stone away anyways.
2/13/2009 2:04:56 PM
#897783
Zabimaru
Ah, yes, every time we can't find the body of somebody, it's proof that they ascended to a higher plane of existence. So that goes for almost every person in history; we don't know where all those bodies are.
2/13/2009 2:08:19 PM
#897785
clockworkcanary
Wow I'm not in my tomb either; guess that proves GOD IS A CHICKEN NAMED BOB! Gotta love that Flawgic.
Oh wait ...I see that "HIS" is capitalized, so the original poster must have meant that Jesus was in somebody else's tomb and that somehow proves there is a Heaven and a Hell.
2/13/2009 2:10:56 PM
#897789
Doctor Whom
The Harry Potter books must be true because Harry Potter isn't still living under the stairs in that Muggle house.
2/13/2009 2:12:14 PM
#897790
rubber chicken
Nor is Cheops. Bow down before Ra!
2/13/2009 2:13:42 PM
#897794
zaatheist
It's Friday, the 13th nogal! I am fundie'ied out. I need a beer. I just cannot think of a suitable repost.
Your God does not exist you religiously brain rotted cretin. You parents are of course to blame for your incurable stupidity. GodPissesMeOffAtTheEndOfTheDay.
2/13/2009 2:15:11 PM
#897800
DoctorFunkopolis
PRAISE JIMMY HOFFA!!!!
2/13/2009 2:19:01 PM
#897804
Tolpuddle Martyr
Eh, what does an empty tomb prove? Other than it's a tomb that is.
2/13/2009 2:19:41 PM
#897806
PsyDan
I don't have proof heaven and hell do not exist. I also don't have proof that candyland doesn't exist. You must believe in that place too... idiot.
2/13/2009 2:23:24 PM
#897808
Mister Spak
What proof do we have that Harry Potter has a cloak of invisibility?
We can't see him. What proof do you have that he doesn't have one?
2/13/2009 2:24:55 PM
#897812
Cabraxas
a) Do you have any proof (outside the bible) that Jesus ever existed? - Remember the Josephus reference is a proven fraud.
b) Do you even know for certain where his tomb is? You'll be the only person on earth that does, if you say yes.
c) Do you have any proof (outside the bible) that he was ever in this tomb that you can't find?
d) No body in this tomb that you cannot find, might mean he never existed (probable),,, was never in it ( even if he existed),,, it could mean he ressurected (hardly likely) or maybe he didn't die on the cross ( much more likely)
2/13/2009 2:27:42 PM
#897814
Dan Onymous
@ Tolpuddle Martyr - "Eh, what does an empty tomb prove? Other than it's a tomb that is."
That doesn't even prove it's a tomb...
2/13/2009 2:29:09 PM
#897832
Lady Anne
To quote Kitchen, the archeologist: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
2/13/2009 2:43:47 PM
#897833
spaceamoeba
Weird answer. Ooh he has Godwin in his username...
I could be wrong, may not be a poe. I dunno.
2/13/2009 2:45:16 PM
#897837
aaa
What sort of tomb? And where is it?
2/13/2009 2:49:59 PM
#897846
Tom S. Fox
My, my, what a nice circle!
2/13/2009 2:56:48 PM
#897888
Moondog
2/13/2009 3:22:08 PM
#897894
Lucilius
Alexander the Great is not in his tomb (or, like Jesus', at least we can't find it). Therefore, Olympus and Hades exist.
2/13/2009 3:25:56 PM
#897904
boojum
So, what does that tell us about Ambrose Bierce, Jimmy Hoffa, D. B. Cooper, and lots of other historically documented missing bodies?
Personally, I think I'm gonna start spreading the Gospel of Ambrose Bierce, just 'cause that'd piss off the cranky old bastard.
2/13/2009 3:33:10 PM
#897915
Grigadil
Schrodinger's cat is living in a teapot in orbit between Earth and Mars...or not.
Yay! I win!!!1!
[edit]
@ Boojum, I'll second that.
2/13/2009 3:43:10 PM
#897917
a mind far far away
Jesus never existed.
2/13/2009 3:46:23 PM
#897953
ausador
The real question is, was he ever in there to start with? So that does not constitute any type of valid proof.
2/13/2009 4:07:46 PM
1 2 3