1 2 3
#420754
Princess Rot
Carnal suppositions sounds kinky. Butt secks for Christ! Get it while its hawt!
3/1/2008 11:24:54 AM
#420756
Deep Search
So dinosaurs were Jains? Only eating parts of plants, never actually killing plants... That's totally rational, sure.
3/1/2008 11:29:37 AM
#420760
LabRat
Can't use the whole "life is in the blood" argument without admitting abortion is ok at the beginning of pregnancy, when there are no blood cells (or heart, or circulatory system, or any organs to carry blood to)
3/1/2008 11:38:40 AM
#420774
Brain_In_A_Jar
Umm, if it was not possible to die at that point, why would they need to eat anything at all?
3/1/2008 12:22:01 PM
#420781
Quantum Mechanic
How do people this stupid find a keyboard?
3/1/2008 12:40:51 PM
#420785
Mister Spak
*points to onli's big book of fairy tales* Well theres your problem!
3/1/2008 12:51:48 PM
#420786
solomongrundy
@LabRat
They're fundies: their fantasies don't need to be internally consistent. This is the Bible we're talking about, not LOTR ;-)
3/1/2008 12:51:48 PM
#420791
Classic
AT LEAST KEEP YOUR SYSTEM INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT!
Re: Life in the blood
Neat find... Not sure it entirely saves this one from being out-and-out wrong.
3/1/2008 1:12:37 PM
#420792
canadiest
Fables: Fictional tales
Bible: Fictional tales
The only difference is those of the Grimm brothers are more fun and have a point that isn't "wow, God is great"
3/1/2008 1:13:23 PM
#420798
Doctor Whom
Have to stick with reality and not fables, including the Word.
Fixed.
3/1/2008 1:37:11 PM
#420804
RoyToy
I think it's Hovind's position that T-Rex had that giant head and giant incisors for cracking coconuts.
Someone threw out the "Life is in the blood" argument. Where does that put insects? Because aren't they bloodless? And therefore lifeless?
3/1/2008 1:48:49 PM
#420807
All people like this should be deported to a country called YECistan
3/1/2008 1:55:42 PM
#420815
Amanda
What? The bible says this? Why didn't you say so before? This changes everything I ever believed in!
/sarcasm
3/1/2008 2:17:20 PM
#420819
Øyvind
Have to stick with the Word and not fables...
The irony is not lost on me.
3/1/2008 2:22:33 PM
#420825
What's up with these folks that insist "Death came through original sin" refers to actual physical death but then go on about eternal life through Jesus being metaphorical life in heaven?
It's gotta be totally literal except for that last bit, eh?
3/1/2008 2:38:33 PM
#420827
Blackvoice
Retards the world over look up to you.
3/1/2008 2:39:37 PM
#420843
bunbuns
Even if all of the animals did eat the fruit of plants, it would still mean some sort of death was taking place (the cells that made up the fruit had to have been digested, which means... dun, dun, DUN!!!!..... DEATH!
Seriously, how do these morons fail this badly at logic??
3/1/2008 3:26:31 PM
#420853
John
Genesis says nothing about their being no death. In fact, why would God have a Tree of Life that granted immortality if everything was immortal anyway? The business about the Fall bringing death into the world was invented out of thin air by Paul. And even Paul was probably talking about spiritual death rather than actual death.
3/1/2008 3:39:50 PM
#420860
Øyvind
But...
if clothing and eating meat are bad things that came about after the Fall... how come fundies aren't vegan nudists? I'd seriously want to know.
3/1/2008 3:56:23 PM
#420871
antichrist
I always love how you people state that <your version> of Genesis must be taken literally (the bible says nothing about animals eating/not eating other animals. And if God's so against blood, why did he accept Abel's sacrifice and dismiss Cain's?
Yet when Jesus says "sell all your possessions and follow me", well, that's up for interpretation.
3/1/2008 4:26:53 PM
#420889
Caustic Gnostic
...no plants, no animals, no nothing died prior to Adam's disobedience. Whatever. I'll bite:
Nothing, plant or animal, had completed a single life cycle before Evie-baby grabbed the apple (even though the first trees and things were suddenly mature and fruiting during their first day). g0d didn't realize that in creating life, he also created death. Once he discovered that living things die, he promptly passed the blame.
That is the fable.
The dinosaurs lived and died before human religion came along, obviously. It's hard to say what sort of fables the dinos believed...did they have a cataclysm myth going?
3/1/2008 5:00:15 PM
#420925
Mattural Selection
"no nothing died prior to Adam's disobedience."
Double negative. That means that everything died before adam's disobedience.
3/1/2008 6:02:38 PM
#420927
Septic Sceptic
This is bemusing. Animals couldn't have eaten each other before the Fall because that would constitute murder, which is a sin. But what about other sins, like fornication? If you're going to insist that a Stegosaurus upholds biblical morality, you would have to pair them up and marry them, lest they commit a sin of the flesh- er, scale, and burn in Satan's Hell.
3/1/2008 6:05:42 PM
#420956
Blayze Kohime
No plants died either? What did everything eat? I have heard people claim dinosaurs ate plants, but never anyone claiming we all used photosynthesis to survive.
But wait... then you said the dinosaurs grazed. So grass is not a plant now?
3/1/2008 7:49:29 PM
#420974
Absolutely 100% correct. "God couldn't have killed off the dinosaurs or anything else for that matter- before Adam." Or after Adam or with Adam or by Adam. Because there was no Adam. "Nothing. Nada. Zilch."PS Although I've enjoyed a lot of "carnal positions", I have only been about 20% sucessful in my "carnal suppositions"!
3/1/2008 9:14:09 PM
1 2 3