ok buddy lets take your post apart bit by bit and see what we find:
All you people that are telling that man to "get a clue" and all that other stuff - I know that you don't have a reasonable comeback to why there ain't no history past 6000 years. it is entirely posable that A) humans have not existed since the dawn of time (even genesis points to events before humanity), I have yet to see anything other than humans write. B) with erosion and decay it is quite posable that writen words (even if something other than humans had the skills to write) that it would have rotted/worn away (the dead sea scrolls were in rather bad shape and they are no where near that old) C.) your asumption is just down right wrong, we have radio carbon dating that can be used to date organic mater up to roughly 60,000 years
WHY DON'T YOU GET A CLUE!!!
I don't need another
Most scientist who aren't working in colleges and universities (wear they still pray to Darwin and whorship evolution)- most of those scientists are forgetting about evolution and sticking with the truth that anyone can find in the Bible - but not JUST because the its in the Bible (KJV). I have no idea what gave you the impression that evolution is a religon or that people pray to Darwin. I have no evidence that "most" "scientists" who are respected by the public are moving away from evolution, I can only theorize that the ones you speak of are those who work for ID labs and are payed to think as such
Now, even if the these scientist never heard of Jesus, they would still come to the conclusion that the earth is very young because cardon dating is not accurate at all not after 60,000 years or on inorganic substances,no, but thats why we have Uranium-thorium dating (among others) isn't it and new evidence points to evolution being wrong on almost all points and that rocks don't just become monkeys over a few generations. of course not that would take millions of years and the right elements They also can see that the Grand Canyon was made my alot of mud sliding very rapidly - not over a long time as previously thought.and this is relevent how? You can find these facts in almost any book that deals with science. In fact, Newsweek magazine just did a survey and most of the scientist they interviewed now believe in the Bible account of creation and are more skeptical of evolution. And there are other and more accurate evidence of creation than of evolution. strange national geographic concluded the opposite
So even if you are a atheist or not (for the time being, because you won't be a athiest forever since every knee WILL bend) you can come to see that the earth is young. or not
it's always disturbed me how people like you are willing to strip away gods power and wisdom I can't see why it even maters to you how the world was created as. wouldn't it just be simpler to love thy neighbor and move on with life?