If by "no evidence" you mean "an insurmountable amount of extremely leading evidence", then yes. Those two seem to be pretty much interchangeable in Fundieland.
10/13/2007 2:00:27 AM
Yet another fundy confuses evolution with cosmology, and faith with evidence.
10/13/2007 2:03:42 AM
Yeah, and I'm going to listen to a backwards, moronic imbecile who can't even get his branches of science right, much less not make a logical fallacy in the first fifteen words he types.
10/13/2007 2:35:34 AM
Of course there's no such thing as background microwave radiation and redshift pointing to an expanding universe. Just like there are no fossils, genetic evidence, or observed adaptation and speciation pointing to evolution. Just close your eyes really tight, keep telepathing your god and pretending the overwhelming evidence will go away and maybe you'll get lucky. And perhaps before the evidence disappears, I'll be elected president of the galaxy (a job I should by no means be allowed to do).
10/13/2007 3:06:19 AM
And of course there's empirical evidence for your God outside the Bible. There isn't? Too bad.
10/13/2007 5:43:49 AM
To be a good scientist, you have to stop making strawmen.
10/13/2007 6:32:22 AM
Science doesn't require faith, only evidence which we have overwealming amounts for both the big bang and evolution. What evidence do you have?
10/13/2007 6:37:08 AM
And the magic man in the sky theory is supported by what?
10/13/2007 7:58:59 AM
No such claim is made.
Thanks for playing though. For your consolation prize, we offer Hawking's A Brief History of Time.
10/13/2007 8:06:04 AM
What do cosmology and biology have in common? Idiots.
10/13/2007 8:42:10 AM
Why must I have faith in big bang? From a scientific point of view accepting
that you don´t know something is preferable to making shit up.
10/13/2007 9:23:04 AM
Evolution != Big Bang. End of story asshat.
10/13/2007 9:35:33 AM
You have no proof that anything in the Bible is true. Why should that be any different?
10/13/2007 11:36:26 AM
Evoltuionist and atheist are not synonyms, there can be atlternative theories that don't requre God, Evolution is not cosmology, it was not a "magic ball" and it wasn't spinning, background radiation shows compelling evidence for the Big Bang, and you are not one to be calling someone else's theories fiction. Did I miss anything?
10/13/2007 5:07:41 PM
These people are dead set against belief in impossible events.
10/13/2007 5:19:47 PM
Actually, we do have evidence for the Big Bang, do you have evidence for your imaginary friend? Didn't think so.
10/13/2007 8:24:29 PM
Noooooo... you need to believe that to be a credible astronomer or astrophysicist. Evolutionism, such as it is an ism, cares only about what's happened here on earth. And atheism takes no position -- most atheists are big-bangers and evolutionists, but there are a few that are way, way, WAY out there.
10/13/2007 9:28:40 PM
Same could be said for creationism.
"To be creationist, you must have faith in and defend the Bible's stories, no matter how impossible that event may be. Creationists says that Go created the Earth and all its beings in six days. They have no proof of this event, no evidence suggesting it, no witnesses, and the Bible is incredibly unreliable, of course... but it's an intriguing fiction nonetheless."
10/13/2007 10:19:31 PM
It is far too easy to find food in this world.
10/13/2007 10:21:48 PM
Hi. Let me introduce you.
10/13/2007 11:04:49 PM
No, you don't need anything to be an atheist. It's great. It's cheap.
10/14/2007 2:02:55 AM
No proof at all. http://xkcd.com/store/ - see the "Science - it works, bitches!"-t shirt.
10/14/2007 12:22:43 PM
"To be an evolutionist/atheist, you must have faith in and defend the "Big Bang" story, no matter how impossible that event may be.
So the Big Bang is impossible but "Goddidit" is not impossible? Mmmkay...
Evolutionists claim to believe that the entire Universe originated when a tiny, spinning, infinitely dense magic ball of matter exploded.
They have no proof of this event, no evidence suggesting it,
Ever heard of background radiation?
Duh, NOTHING would be alive at the big bang.
and they haven't developed a plausible theory of where this matter came from, of course...
Where did God come from?
but it's an intriguing fiction nonetheless."
Ditto with your Bible.
11/15/2007 9:58:39 AM
I actually think the Big Bang is bullshit. However, until a more plausible theory is thought of, I will weakly believe it.
Also, even if the Big Bang was completely disproven, evolution would still be true. They are not related AT ALL
5/3/2008 11:58:49 PM
God Is Real Unless Declared Integer
Big Bang != Evolution, and both have more evidence than you can possibly imagine, Fundy!
7/13/2008 3:22:20 PM