the net is full of evidences- pure scientific evidences that don't rely on biblical interpretations- Formations in the earth that contradict old age, radio-halos that suggest rapid formation, carbon-14 readings that contradict old age suggestions, every bit as valid theories about light and the age of the universe being younger than previously thought, red-shifts suggesting our present knowledge of light speed may be off by tons, on and on it goes. there's plenty for those who don't trip themselves up on religious OPINION that accompanies 'some' of the scientific findings- (As though suggesting that scientists can't have their own independant opinions- yet these same people that suggest any religious opinion contained with scientific reports disqualifies the science facts that are found, will turn right around and allow the most perposterous evolutionary opinion, and call that science- remember the monster theory? Global Cooling? Global Warming? The lies that were presented as scientific fact such as endosimbiotic relationships were 'macroevolution' being witnessed? When in fact it was nothing but a syimbiotic ralationship which they later begrudgingly admitted when exposed for the liars that they were by those who didn't blindly buy into their crap? & how bout all them 'missing link' fossils that have been proven false by sound science?
Just one piece of evidence? Oh my, there's a ton.
21 comments
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
