"No you will not teach or show that propagandist Al Gore video to my child, blaming our nation -- the greatest nation ever to exist on this planet -- for global warming,"
So which country are you going to blame it on then: Bhutan, the only country on the planet that is a Carbon Sink...?!
"after Hardison's e-mail she was told by her principal that she would receive a disciplinary letter for not following school board rules that require her to seek written permission to present "controversial" materials in class."
If I were that teacher I'd say 'Bring it on. Then I'm gonna sue you & your little dog too, for denying me my 1st Amendment rights, citing Kitzmiller vs. Dover as a precedent in making the "teaching the controversy" illegal.'
Moral: You don't want your fundie spawnling taught teh nasty ebil facts, just 'hoemskule' the brat. McDonald's, Burger King, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell et all need all the monkeys paid peanuts they can get.
Thank fuck I was educated here in the UK, where first & foremost, thinking for yourself is encouraged. Even before the National Curriculum, scientific facts & relious 'beliefs' were completely separate. Post-National Curriculum, the teaching of the Big Bang & Evolution as fact is compulsory; especially for 'faith schools' who rely on state funding. Even private tutoring & homeschooling aren't exempt from the NC, neither.
No Kitzmiller vs. Dover required for us, thank fuck.
@Raggy
Then that fundie cunt will demand that said car be a GM Hy-Wire, powered by a hydrogen fuel cell; all it emits from it's exhaust is water. They're gonna have no choice, when the oil starts running out...!
--EDIT--
@Nagol
As I saw on the weather forecast last night, the Gulfstream being directed over France the last few months (and has decided to move over the UK now, as it should be at this time of the year) is what's responsible for the awful weather we in the UK's been having of late (the wettest April, June & July since 2007; almost mirroring the floods we had five years ago).
The Meteorological Office, pouring through the petabytes of data their supercomputers have to crunch through - in 2007 & 2012 - and in the data they share with their counterparts in other countries, all pinpoint the problem at one source: atmospheric heat-gain via excessive carbon emissions, and how such affects weather patterns planet-wide. The largest source for such being the USA.
Now, would the fundie naysayers care - or dare - to dispute the point in court, considering their success in Kitzmiller vs. Dover, re. their 'evidence'...?! [/hyper-sarcasm]
