1
#52134
Austin
1)Bigfoot has been proven false
2)The Loch Ness Monster is said to be a plesiosaur, NOT a dinosaur
7/13/2006 10:58:50 PM
#52179
CousinTed
There's actually still debate on the whole Bigfoot issue. That's not to say that Bigfoot is real, just that there's never been any conclusive evidence put forth.
7/14/2006 12:21:26 AM
#52264
Napoleon the Clown
Yeah, Bigfoot has neither been proven or disproven. All that's happened is all the videos so far have been shown to be pure bullshit.
As for the fundie's comment... Yes, keep trying to twist reality...
7/14/2006 4:59:54 AM
#52378
Julian
Naked Adam vs a T-Rex. Chief of creation my fucking ass!
7/14/2006 11:22:01 AM
#152091
Patrick
Actually guys, there is a species of ancient up-right walking mammals / pre-humans that fit the bigfoot bill. Problem is that they are extinct, lol.
And as mentiond above, no Dinos were aquatic, so no, Nessie/what it is percieved to be isn't a dino.
2/2/2007 8:46:55 PM
#152301
Alena
It would kick ass if Nessie existed. But, yeah. Your Logic Fu is weak, TonkaTruck.
2/3/2007 1:48:40 AM
#152486
Damn Yankee
Both Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster have been shown to be false, the one through image analysis, the other through mass sonar sweeping.
2/3/2007 5:55:46 AM
#386719
Emyu
Oh. Well. That explains the perfect consistency between the fundamentalist belief in a young earth and the carbon dating of dinosaur fossils.
Oh, and 6000 now equals 65 million, too.
1/21/2008 8:11:28 AM
1