Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 1738

How easily you display your belief in IMAGINARY numbers, but yet pretend that a VERY REAL God is mythology.

Nutrider99, Free Conservatives 30 Comments [7/31/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
#473
Nike

...This is so stupid it warrants comment, yet it's so stupid that I can't think of anything to say.

8/2/2005 12:35:18 AM
#489
Crosis

Oh, this guy again. Wasn't he the nutjob who thought sqrt(-1)=1?

8/2/2005 9:31:37 PM
#121512
Redhunter

The only imaginary 'Numbers' is the bible book of the same name.

12/15/2006 11:29:18 AM
#152606
Øyvind

Someone needs to take a math class.

2/3/2007 4:53:30 PM
#250165
Crosis

Actually, Crosis, sqrt (anything) = God did it.

6/12/2007 9:14:36 PM
#250179
Raewyn

WTF? Are there two Crosises or does the one Crosis have MPD or something? *confused*

Oh right, the comment. Nutrider99 (what kind of name is that anyway) is either 13 and hasn't learned this kind of math or is older and declined the opportunity to do so.

6/12/2007 11:23:34 PM
#250214
DFox

Yes Nutrider99, God is very real, now go to sleep or Santa Claus won't come. You remember what happened when you tried to stay up and meet the Tooth Fairy don't you?

6/13/2007 1:44:31 AM
#250230
jo_27e

yes, we have a new cult, mathsology

6/13/2007 3:24:38 AM
#250242
gunapithesunrose

i can just feel my intellegence being pulled towards the black hole that exists between this fucktards ears.
Question: What number isn't imaginary? they exist a priori. you can experince a number! retard.

6/13/2007 4:33:36 AM
#255338


Zero, the atheist number?

6/26/2007 5:15:55 PM
#255346
Puck

Arrr...we be Matheists.

6/26/2007 5:24:17 PM
#255407
Professor M

It sounds like Nutrider is a product of the A Beka math homeschool curriculum.

(Actually, I'm not sure about A Beka's policy on imaginary numbers; but given their doctrinal opposition to set theory? Yeah. That there's some grade-A batshit.)

6/26/2007 8:09:20 PM
#255537
Jack Bauer

i

6/27/2007 10:03:45 AM
#255538
Jack Bauer

Would Nutrider care to compare and contrast the Laplace Transformnation and the Fourrier Transform, paying particular attention as to the areas of validity of each?

How about a comment on tensors?

Let's be Boolean for a moment - I expect he believes that the empty set, Ø, is not actually empty but has god living in it...

6/27/2007 10:12:03 AM
#255546
Jim

...Okay, nutrider? Please change your name. It conjures up many hours of unpleasantness.

6/27/2007 11:34:07 AM
#528691
Qubit

Technically an imaginary number still belongs to the set of reals.

6/5/2008 5:34:09 PM
#877023
Porter

He probably did not go to high school.

2/1/2009 5:54:01 AM
#877032
JKHGUIODL/KGNMK'SZTR'J

POE

2/1/2009 6:05:49 AM
#913053
AyalaofBorg

@Qubit: Uh, no it doesn't. Imaginary means non-real. They are a subset of complex numbers, quaternions, octonions and sedenions, though.

2/24/2009 10:45:52 PM
#913556
Canadiest

Numbers are representive of reality (it's not just the number six, it's six apples or whatever)

God is representive of ancient people without the sciences in place to recognize reality ( plus a lot of control the masses and women tossed in)

2/25/2009 1:02:22 PM
#913559
Ostravan

The square root of (-1) is refered to as imaginary, but is in fact a VECTOR quantity - a mathematical tool.
A god is as real as you wish to make it - they're ALL man-made anyway.

2/25/2009 1:07:04 PM
#913925
Arts_Myth

Nutrider99 = sqrt(_._)

2/25/2009 9:34:02 PM
#913975
SINister

eat a bag of dicks....that is all/

2/25/2009 9:56:45 PM
#979011
Efrain

Well the numbers are friendly.

7/1/2009 12:41:34 AM
#979014
Clown

Lol. Numbers are tools. God is a tool. They are both product of imagination. The only difference is that numbers are much more usefull.

7/1/2009 1:23:16 AM
1 2