St.Tropez #fundie

St.Tropez #fundie incels.is

The inceldom is how humans are designed. There is nosolving it,it is eternal category

Only very high IQ ppl will understand this. There is also no shame in being incel/loser etc. By design more males are born then females and their value is less,execs males used to die in wars and plagues but it is still the same concept,you have too much males who need to be filtered out.

Look at the sperm,that is your first filter out of millions of other sperm you made it first. However... now the game is just getting started as the next filtering awaits,kindergarten,schools,university,job,finding mate ,and so on untill you die. And at each of those steps you have ppl who get filtered out.That is why I laugh at low IQ ppl here who still think in terms of "hating females","MRA","MGTOW","solving societal problems",politics" etc.

If you even think in these terms you don't understand existence at all and are low IQ. Being incel is not a tragedy,it is nothing special even and is much better than having kids who are sub optimal. Really if you are struggling at life chances are you shouldn't be even alive as you are low value individual evidenced by your struggle. The only logical conclusion of being incel is to rope yourself. However I personally still hope/cope,but deep down I know my time for sui has long since passed.

17 comments

old comment by Zinnia

The male / female skew comes from the following - first, male fetuses are slightly more likely to miscarry. This is due to the Y chromosome being shorter than the X; if there's a fatal genetic flaw on the X and nothing to balance it out on the Y, you get a dead fetus. Second, men are more likely to succeed at committing suicide, or engage in dangerous work which could get them killed, than women are. That's more a cultural thing in patriarchal societies than anything inherently biological, though. Pregnancy used to be occasionally fatal, but with modern medicine that's extremely rare. Finally, being tall and having a body full of testosterone both tend to result in shorter lifespans, and men are more likely to have those traits than women.

That being said, with more women existing than men, if a straight man has trouble finding a woman in an environment with a typical sex ratio, then that's generally entirely on him. Whining about one's supposed flaws (even if real) really does not help.

[Edit] Plus men are slightly more likely to be murdered, also a patriarchy thing.

old comment by HS

Only very high IQ ppl will understand this.

The meaning of that sentence, coupled with it's grammar, is just inherently effing funny.

Also, not trying to start a fight there, but I'm afraid a lot of commenters here (the ones pointing out the fact of there being more women than men) are getting this quote wrong. He's not saying there are more men than women. He's saying more men than women are born, which, AFAIK, is true, the ratio is about 105/100 in favor of males. He says the useless ones get "filtered out", using gender-neutral language, but obviously only talking about men, because of course, in incel-world, women never face any serious problems. So, in fact, more women than men only makes sense according to his worldview, as they don't get "filtered out", in his view.

Not trying to start a fight, it just irks me to see people getting this wrong.

Edit: Got it wrong, it's 107/100 in favor of males. Close enough tho.

Further edit: Also, apparently, there are actually more men than women alive.

old comment by Salami

[Edited: fixed very silly mistake]

A very common thing for misogynists to reference is the fact that struggling societies have more women than men. The exception is unless there's some artificial selection going on where people are deliberately aborting or killing females in hopes of carrying a son to term next time, raising a son the next time, and/or murdering "bad" females before they can reproduce. Thus, they say, women are responsible for the decline of society.

They have the cause and effect reversed.

In reality, it turns out that several traits of a child are determined by environment, one of them being birth sex (you can see this in thriving societies too-- its the reason that a population in well-off societies that have not had any human interference consistently has around 50/50 male to female ratio with a slightly larger amount of females). For whatever reason, when famines, homelessness, environmental changes, etc. cause shit to hit the fan, humans somehow evolved the ability to significantly increase the likelihood of eggs getting two X chromosomes that cause the egg to develop into a female. Its not quite known exactly why this phenomenon occurs-- it could be that women have an in-built genetic insurance policy in the form of another X chromosome that makes them more likely to be viable and survive to whatever's considered old age in the region, it could be that women statistically live longer than men (therefore making have lots of women around a good investment in a future in places where infant mortality is common and opportunities for good pregnancies may be scarce), it could be that women are less likely to get diseases that rely on excess iron in the blood to thrive (Iron is a very common powerhouse for prokaryotes and there are plenty of parasites that get it from our bloodstream and then, if successful, go on to raid other areas of the body for iron. Women, however, get rid of excess iron in the bloodstream a lot quicker than men because they're statistically smaller than men and because periods, breastfeeding, and pregnancies use up and expel lots of iron from the bloodstream), or maybe something else. But it happens on a pretty reliable basis so long as people don't interfere in some way.

---

Also, I'd love to post pictures of people whose faces and bodies have been seriously fucked up by all kinds of awful shit in WWI and WWII but still have loving families and friends or had them for as long as they were alive. But they tend to be pretty graphic and I fear it would be degrading and disrespectful to use their visages just to prove a point about anything except the impact wars can have on ordinary people or why we have nice things like the Geneva conventions and the ability to prosecute people for war crimes. You are, however, free to Google them if you want to see my point.

old comment by HS

@Salami

Wouldn't that be simply due to stressful external factors weakening the mother's organism, thus endangering the fetus, thus increasing the number of miscarriages, and female fetuses simply being more likely to survive in such environment, thanks to being, by design, genetically stronger? Never looked much into this topic, but from studies I read, that's what seems to me to be happening.

Also, may I add that the opposite happens in times of war.

Edit: The fact that, while less boys than girls are born during times of stress, the ones that are born are healthier than average, does definitely imply that it's simply about excess miscarriages of weaker fetuses, of which male fetuses are the primary victims, due to being, by design, genetically weaker.