Quote# 12669
[Emphasis added]
Congress has the right to regulate the judiciary, including its jurisdiction. Under federal law, it was clear that the federal court did not have jurisdiction outside
the terrorist of the United States, particularly when it involved a person of foreign citizenship (in this case a Yemeni).
[...]
In its warning, SCOTUS was really saying "This is a political decision that we demand rights to usurp, any attempt of the people of the Republic to defy us will only cause us to use more inventive reasons to maintain illegal power - no matter what the law says or the people want".
To my mind, that is naked power and repression. We ought to reply with federal marshalls arresting the bastards and shooting them between their terrorist loving eyes.
maxparrish,
Free Conservatives 16 Comments [6/30/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Sierra
1
#47944
Blurb
Paranoia anyone?
6/30/2006 2:19:06 AM
#47952
Napoleon the Clown
They have medication for these conditions, you know. You'll feel much better and the threats won't come from all sides any more.
6/30/2006 2:27:14 AM
#47957
Amigone201
I'm not surprised this accident of nature thinks we should shoot the Supreme Court justices upon their arrest. He doesn't seem to care much for the judicial process when applied to brown people, why should he care about it with judges?
6/30/2006 2:39:15 AM
#47961
Hadanelith
I...don't quite get what he's saying...
6/30/2006 3:03:20 AM
#47995
Julian
Ummmm, I'm not exactly a US legal expert, but hasn't this guy said enough to be arrested under the Patriot Act? Did he just say all nine Supreme Court judges deserved to be executed in cold blood?
6/30/2006 4:57:24 AM
#48000
Papabear
Really, the best I can make out of this is that max is paranoid, not too bright and has no respect for due process. My conservetard to English translator can't find a truly error-free sentence in this post.
6/30/2006 5:04:13 AM
#48001
themann1086
Congress doesn't have the right to regulate SCOTUS.
I highly recommend you take a gander at Article VI of our Constitution. Something about signed treaties being \"the highest law of the land\".
6/30/2006 5:08:29 AM
#48005
Napoleon the Clown
I highly recommend you take a gander at Article VI of our Constitution. Something about signed treaties being \"the highest law of the land\".
I thought the \"highest law of the land\" was any legislation made while you were high off your ass...
6/30/2006 5:25:06 AM
#48041
Redhunter
First you give your own interpretation of something, then tell us what those words mean to you?
Did you mean 'territories'?
Did you bump your head?
Change your name to 'facts perish'.
6/30/2006 8:06:17 AM
#48049
Alejandro
Freudian Slip of the Month?
6/30/2006 9:16:22 AM
#48116
xMinionX
Anyone else see the irony in denying a judge a trial before executing him?
6/30/2006 1:58:39 PM
#48166
David D.G.
Scary guy.
~David D.G.
6/30/2006 4:29:39 PM
#48183
AWP
Translation please
6/30/2006 5:25:34 PM
#48253
g-21-lto
Please, never run for office. Because there are idiots out there who *will* vote for you.
6/30/2006 11:55:35 PM
#48466
Crosis
<<< Congress has the right to regulate the judiciary, including its jurisdiction. >>>
Not the Supreme Court, dipshit. The Constitution gives Congress the right to regulate all the courts below the Supreme Court, but not the Supreme Court.
7/2/2006 1:07:07 AM
#317820
Wet Walnuts
Nice to see that maxparrish values the rule of law so highly.
10/24/2007 4:09:05 AM
1