1 2
#47941
whitewater55
The smirking chimp and his vanguard should be impeached, then tried for war crimes.
6/30/2006 2:14:02 AM
#47946
Napoleon the Clown
Bullets fight terrorists, not terrorism. Killing will only spawn more terrorism.
6/30/2006 2:21:13 AM
#47963
Amigone201
How do you fight a concept with an object?
6/30/2006 3:05:53 AM
#47964
Hadanelith
On one hand, killing them does tend to make people angry. On the other hand, death solves all problems: no man, no problem (that's a Stalin quote for you). Seriously, Napolean hit it dead on.
6/30/2006 3:07:02 AM
#47965
Sierra
Yea, the right to life is the most important right in America, which is why we should go kill people indiscriminately to defend it. Wait...
6/30/2006 3:12:25 AM
#47971
Talisman
\"but I am much more grateful to President George Walker Bush for exercising his executive power within its Constitutional bounds to defend the most important right of American citizens: life.\"
All the while stepping on the other rights we have. Besides, I would think the right to liberty would be the most important right we Americans have. Just ask the Founding Fathers.
6/30/2006 3:46:30 AM
#47991
Julian
Stupid fucking idiot. Since when has oppression ever created love? Destroying someone's home, career, family, quality of life and dignity is the best way to MAKE a terrorist, not prevent one!
To quote Scott Adams:
\"The beatings will continue until morale improves!\"
6/30/2006 4:48:47 AM
#47992
Julian
Fuckwit, I thought the 2nd amendment was the right to bear arms, not the right to beat Arabs.
6/30/2006 4:50:21 AM
#47994
Bone_Vulture
ARGH the irony is making my skin flake off!
6/30/2006 4:57:23 AM
#47996
Ice
Sad thing is that, if you look at the rest of the posts, it's like \"Oh, I'm a happy christian! Oh, I'm so good in this world of evil! Oh, we have morals!\" and this is so ironic that it hurts!
6/30/2006 4:57:28 AM
#48004
Papabear
Appartently, life is an American right which should be preserved by shooting most everyone else. Hmmm, that does sound like the Bush foreign policies.
6/30/2006 5:19:32 AM
#48011
Lord Zeruel
We defend life by killing indiscriminately! LOL
6/30/2006 6:10:02 AM
#48019
Redhunter
What are you talking about? He ignored the warnings leading up to 9/11, people are still getting things through airport 'security', bush didn't finish Afganistan (like father like son to not finish what he started), started an illegal war on faulty evidence (that is, no evidence), and has aligned most of the world against us in one form or another. Yeah, he's a real fucking winner.
6/30/2006 6:42:42 AM
#48027
NotMe
Before 9-11 no one was really afraid of terrorism. After the WTC fell people hyped the threat of terrorism and suddenly everything you see on the news is terrorist here and terrorist there while you'll probably never even be confronted with terrorism in your daily life.
Another thing I really doubt is that just about every \"terrorist\" they shoot or capture is automaticly a member of the Taliban or Bin Ladens little club.
6/30/2006 7:17:44 AM
#48139
Prager
I swear allegiance to George II and to the ignorance for which he stands; one religion under fundamentalism, with liberty and justice for none!
6/30/2006 2:49:17 PM
#48140
MK
To quote the late great Patrick Henry: \"Give me liberty or give me death!\"
Hmmmm.... wonder what the more important thing was for him?
6/30/2006 2:49:42 PM
#48143
David D.G.
Talk about perceiving the world through an ideological filter. This fellow must have camo-colored glasses.
~David D.G.
6/30/2006 3:22:23 PM
#48177
Nekhbet
Julian, to quote Lyndon B. Johnson; \"If you have 'em by the balls their hearts and minds follow\" ( It didn't work in Viet Nam either)
6/30/2006 4:46:22 PM
#48209
Berny
Seeing as the Iraqis under Saddam Hussein were absolutely no threat to Americans living in the USA; your president, and everyone who supports his little illegal war, is a war criminal in my book.
The same will apply should the fucktard attack Iran.
6/30/2006 8:06:15 PM
#48240
Brain_In_A_Jar
It's been said before, but I'll say it again: You can't kill an idea with bullets.
Oh, but you know the president's middle name - well that just adds so much credibility to your argument that I shall have to stand down!
6/30/2006 10:11:49 PM
#48260
Crosis
<<< for exercising his executive power within its Constitutional bounds >>>
Not according to the Supreme Court.
7/1/2006 12:20:28 AM
#48318
Napoleon the Clown
Originally posted by Brain
It's been said before, but I'll say it again: You can't kill an idea with bullets.
Well, you can, provided you kill every thinking creature...
7/1/2006 3:29:50 AM
#49990
Brain_In_A_Jar
Ahh, but Napoleon, if there's no one left alive to check, is the idea dead?
7/6/2006 9:44:15 PM
#58508
Ens
I'm confused with the reaction here.
I don't really find this fundy. I disagree with him and am not enamored of Bush's record, but this isn't the sort of batshit-insane thinking this site is known for.
I'm all for education and that, but it may be that every once in a while we have to fight terrorists -- and by extension, terrorism, their cause -- with bullets (much as we might say we fought Germany or Nazism with bullets in WWII).
8/2/2006 2:07:56 AM
#58601
Julian
oh boy, that all important right to kill someone you don't like, or better still have your country do it for you!
YAAAAY!
8/2/2006 6:39:09 AM
1 2