It is heard time and time again that logic and reason are the foundations of an humanistic world view. By that same reasoning, creation is the logical and reasonable choice.

Let's examine.

These are the 2 choices most agreed upon.

1) Everything is a the product of chance where nothing created everything randomly. Our own existence is a "miracle" and unexplainable by modern scientific analysis. The only rules that exist are the laws of space, time and physics. Moral accountability is subjective and unfounded, thus anything goes. This path eventually leads to permanent destruction for everything in a world where nothing really matters in the first place.

2) The universe as observed by us, was created by a superior inter-dimensional being that has laid out rules for mankind which are to guide us to an absolute good and away from an absolute evil. This creates a system for accountability, spiritual growth and a life where all can Love. The same creator promises to destroy evil once and for all. Destroying this fallen world that was used to be an example to those that would rebel against these absolute rules for life. The promise of eternal life and happiness is present.

To summarize,

Choice 1 is a life of no importance/meaning, no good/evil, no life beyond death.

Choice 2 is a life of extreme importance/meaning, a life guided by absolute Love, and the hope of resurrection and eternal happiness.

Logic would dictate that the 2nd choice yields the best example for life and the hope to see wickedness destroyed and an eternal paradise.

We will examine the reasons why this logic cannot be accepted by secularists and then delve into which world view specifically is the correct choice.
There can only be one correct view after all. It is only logical.