Quote# 116115

Your god, darwin, is a false one, yesanything, and so too is the evil power behind him (satan), but the God of the Bible is not.

And contrary to what your OP implies, your evolution story has a lot more major problems than just the problem that to begin, it needs to resort to whacky mystical explanations which impossibly violate the scientific law of biogenesis which states that only life can begat life.

The answer is not to make something up which is what all gods are.

Are you kidding me? evolutionists make up stuff all the time. Why do you think sometimes brontosaurus is a dinosaur, and then sometimes brontosaurus is not a dinosaur, and then sometimes brontosaurus is a dinosaur again? Why do you think for several decades Pluto is a planet, then all of a sudden Pluto is not a planet? Why do you think one week ida darwinus is the "missing link" that finally "proves" that apes transformed into men, and the next week, ida is just a lemur? Why do you think evolutionists universally promoted the Piltdown Man fraud, in museums and everywhere else, as "scientific fact" to "prove" evolution to the public worldwide, for over 40 years? etc. etc. That kind of list could go on endlessly.

The only way things like that could happen is by a) evolutionists making things up and b) the things they make up are full of crap.

Navaros, IMDB 22 Comments [1/17/2016 3:37:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Username:
Comment:



1 | bottom



You're still not proving the existence of your God. Evolution could become completely bunk tomorrow, but you still haven't proved the existence of your God.

1/17/2016 3:56:50 PM

Hasan Prishtina

Unlike fundies, scientists differ among themselves and change their minds when new evidence is discovered. And if further evidence is presented that shows something different, they change their minds again. You, on the other hand, belong to a tradition which also changes its mind regularly. The difference between the two is that, while scientists are honest about changing their minds, fundies pretend that their current beliefs have always been the only conceivable truth which they have always believed.

1/17/2016 4:15:14 PM

Meeeh

Your god, darwin...

Sigh...

1/17/2016 4:17:30 PM

KingOfRhye

What the hell does Pluto have to do with any of this? Nothing about it changed, they just didn't want to call it a planet any more....so f-ing what??

1/17/2016 4:18:12 PM

Phil O'Macedon

Your ignorance is breathtaking, like six day old roadkill in August. You don't know what abiogenesis means. You don't have a clue what science knows about Apatosaurus. Reclassifying Pluto as a dwarf planet does not indicate scientists do not understand what it is. The Piltdown man "hoax" was likely an honest mistake made in the earliest days of biological anthropology. It was mostly only believed authentic in England. French and American experts were generally skeptical if not actually negative in their assessment. The final verdict on Piltdown Man was not rendered by religious experts, just so you know. Darwinus Massillae was named in honor of C. Darwins bicentennial birthday, and was described as "superficially similar to a modern lemur", and was never considered a member of Hominidae. Nobody ever said it was the fabled "missing link" that I am aware of- besides you. Ida was the name given to the fossil specimen. You got anything else to say that's abysmally stupid?

1/17/2016 4:30:14 PM

Old Viking

Amazing. It's highly unusual to come upon a statement that is wrong in every regard. Hard to tell whether this one is motivated by malice or bone-deep stupidity. A mixture, would be my guess.

1/17/2016 5:03:58 PM

pyro

> Amazing. It's highly unusual to come upon a statement that is wrong in every regard. Hard to tell whether this one is motivated by malice or bone-deep stupidity. A mixture, would be my guess.

You're talking about the "holy and righteous penis" guy. I vote stupidity.

1/17/2016 5:16:48 PM

The Mimic Octopus

When has Brontosaurus considered to be anything but a dinosaur?
As usual, Hasan Prishtina has hit the nail in the hollow head.

1/17/2016 5:19:08 PM

Anon-e-moose

"Your god, darwin, is a false one, yesanything, and so too is the evil power behind him (satan), but the God of the Bible is not."

Meanwhile, in the central place of worship of the Church of England, Westminster Abbey:



The only way things like this could happen is by a) the C-of-E openly admitting that most of the Bible - including Genesis - is purely fable & metaphor: as in not to be taken literally, thus they acknowledge scientific fact, or b) Navaros Did Not Do The Research first, thus he is full of crap.

1/17/2016 5:44:19 PM

creativerealms

The Mimic Octopus

It's a case of creationists getting things half right and then exaggerating things. Basically for the longest time scientists didn't think there was enough difference between a Brontosaurus and an Apatosaurus and just last year they decided that yes they are different enough. Creationists have taken that and ran with it, evolutionists are wrong again.

1/17/2016 7:49:39 PM

TimeToTurn

That's not called "making stuff up" (which is closer to what "creation scientists" do when they try and explain how Noah's Ark works, etc.), that's called "scientific progress". Because unlike the Bible, science is always changing as scientists discover new things and re-analyse old evidence. And that's what makes science work.

1/17/2016 9:09:09 PM

Kanna

The depths of ignorance here are staggering, as are the complete mis-statements throughout. And I'm quite certain that Darwin isn't to blame for whatever classification Pluto is in at any given moment....

Put it another way, Navaros. When scientists reclassify something, it is because they now know MORE about it than they did before, not because they are "making stuff up".

1/17/2016 9:41:14 PM



How can anyone be this stupid and still remember to breathe?

1/17/2016 10:14:47 PM

Prager

@Meeeh

I'm getting seriously tired of that one, too.

1/18/2016 1:43:27 AM

Swede

Darwin was a human being, not a god, silly. Darwin was so respected that he was buried in the Westminster Abbey.

Evolution is a completely natural explanation of an observable and observed natural process of adaptation of existing life through random mutation and natural selection. It’s all about life begetting life. You’re thinking about abiogenesis.

Pluto IS a planet; a dwarf planet. It's all about definitions, not any changes in the actual objects or animals.

Why do you think you're newborn, and then all of a sudden you're five years old, and then all of a sudden your 10 years old, etc...

When missing links are found, you have two new missing links, on each side of the newly found link, stupid.

The only way things like that could happen is by constantly learning new things about the Universe and the planet we live on.

1/18/2016 2:17:33 AM



The difference here is that none of those things you reference were ever touted as absolute, unshakeable facts, except the part about Pluto being a planet, which was then corrected.

Sometimes, science is WRONG. And that's okay, because science isn't about dogma. It's about finding the truth.

Also, evolution and the origin of life are entirely different topics of study, dipshit.

1/18/2016 4:49:15 AM

Mister Spak

Why do you think creationists universally promoted Paluxy mantracks fraud, in "museums" and everywhere else, as a "scientific fact" to "prove" creation to the public worldwide, for over 40 years? etc etc. That kind of list could go on endlessly.

1/18/2016 7:21:06 AM

Doubting Thomas

Repeat quote, I think, so I'll just link to this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=771E0aOFS4Q

1/18/2016 7:45:26 AM



I have no idea how evolution works, but let me explain to you why it's wrong.

1/18/2016 7:47:34 AM

Doubting Thomas

@Phil O'Macedon

The final verdict on Piltdown Man was not rendered by religious experts, just so you know.

Actually Piltdown Man was found to be a hoax because the skull did not fit in with evolutionary theory. It required a little closer scrutiny by scientists which revealed that it was a human skull with an ape's lower jaw.

1/18/2016 7:48:58 AM

Teague Prower

"Your god, darwin, is a false one, yesanything, and so too is the evil power behind him (satan), but the God of the Bible is not."


1/19/2016 3:07:34 PM

Phil O'Macedon

@ Doubting Thomas; I looked it up. The Piltdown man aparently was a deliberate hoax, though the scientific "experts" of those early days could be easily fooled simply from a lack of a serious body of referential data. The skull was a fairly late homo sapiens sapiens(not an accidental repeat) specimen, the jaw was that of an orangutan (definitely not native to England!) Science marches on!

1/20/2016 5:18:22 AM

1 | top: comments page