caamib #sexist

caamib #sexist whygodwhy.org

I am not an MRA because MRAs are manginas. We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day. Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength or access to weapons. Then we could make feminists and sluts into prostitutes, kill off all omega scumbag players and make a sane society with decent men and women. MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem when just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem.

118 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"I am not an MRA"

...but you are Mary Jane, m'boy. With emph-ass-is on boy; as in little.

"We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day"

Yeah. Like Eliot Todger did, amirite?!

"omega"

...who make cool watches. And is the coolest thing in the entire space-time continuum [/hyper-smartarse]

"MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem"

'Women are the problem' is the whole basis of your problem from your uniquely insane - and ultra-solipsistic, certainly mega-selfish - point of view, therefore you ARE an 'MRA' too. [/Doublethink]

Is it just me, or is Mary Jane Lick Sick sounding more and more like Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll's "Alice Through The Looking Glass":

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean neither more nor less.'

(From page 19 of that thread on WGW):

image

Must be cold in that river in Egypt, Mary Jane. Wet, too.

@MK

"Yeah dont think this guy's going to go long without making headline news."

He already has, in a way (from ED article):

image

old comment by SpukiKitty

If MPMs are too lax for you, you have issues.

And what makes you think women don't have access to weapons?

And, with the right training, any woman can make a man eat pavement. Size & brawn doesn't always matter. Get the centuries of "Women are super-weak" programming out of women & girls heads and we can be pretty dang FIERCE!

In the ancient Dharmic faiths, the Active Principle/Power of All-That-Is is considered FEMALE (Making the rampant misogyny in India and especially among devout Hindus even more perplexing)!

Remember, there were prehistoric moms defending their kiddos from sabre-tooth cats & stuff. All she-mammals do this...DON'T MESS WITH MOMMA BEAR!

old comment by Tricky Fox

"I am not an MRA because MRAs are manginas"
hey i'm not fond of MRAs either, but at the very least i don't go all internet tough guy about it

"We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day"
and what, pray tell, is "this system" exactly?

"Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength or access to weapons"
you're not very bright, are you? you're an internet tough guy, of course you aren't

"Then we could make feminists and sluts into prostitutes"
[ITG INTENSIFIES]

"kill off all omega scumbag players and make a sane society with decent men and women"
holy shed! my ITG measuring equipment is going off the charts!

"MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem when just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem."
No caamib. YOU and YOUR ilk are the feckin' problem.

old comment by caamib

MK- why would my arrest record indicate that?

Zeus - "Why do you act like men act like one cohesive hive mind?"

I don't, but most men today support main feminist policies.

"Also what the flying fuckity fuck is a seduction based society? How is a society based around women can get things without having to resort to their sexuality or being the mother of someone important more seduction based than one where is the only way they could express power or being human beings."

A seduction based society is a society where men get women by means of seduction instead by being providers. This destroys the will of men who'd be providers to work and thus it ultimately kills a society.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Sadsack

We men could take down this system... just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem...
I don't plan to fund anything nor am I a general. I am saying what would happen if men became sane. I am not saying I would either fund or run anything, even if the case men became sane - others would so then...

And yet, despite saying everybody sitting on their ass and not being a psychopathic murderer plunging the world into chaos for no good reason and immediately admitting to being the guy who will sit on his ass right through said chaos and destruction of the world everybody else is the problem but you, AMIRIGHT?

The guy who lives on welfare "out of principle" and has no intention of ever finding work because it won't help him to get laid moralizing on the reduction male providers killing the society he wants to collapse.

Please sir, I am bereft of ribs. Allow me to catch my breath in between your saying unimaginably idiotic and hypocritical things without the barest hint of irony.

old comment by caamib

Passerby - the crux of your hilarious argument is actually quite scary. You are a man and yet you seem to want men to be drones for the hate machine of feminism that made them incel in the first place.

I don't want to be a provider because I don't want to provide to a femifascist government that keeps me incel.

If I could have my own wife and kids I'd be happy to provide for them and give something to my government.

But feminist policies my government supports made it impossible for me to have a family and if I worked I'd actually pay money for that.

Who in their right mind for pay for their own loneliness?

I have some friends who are idiots and work, thus paying for their own loneliness. It they have it - all of them are alone for years and deserve to be. They funded the feminism which ensures they'll stay alone.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Sadsack

And who in any state of mind rejects the self respect that comes from being self-sufficient? Or the dignity? Or the pride? Or the disposable income? Or the companionship of co-workers? Or the reason to leave the house?

At the very least it would give you one single leg to stand on when you pontificate about how the economy somehow runs on sex. A single, creaky, arthritic stump that can't hold the weight of your ego but it would still count as a leg.

As it stands you're just flopping about the rocks like a fish trying to spite the ocean.

Seriously, Sadboy, how does you getting paid benefit a woman in even an abstract manner especially seeing as none would touch you with a thirty foot flaming spear? And the ones desperate enough to consider fucking a troll like you you've gone to great lengths to treat like shit, calling them public urinals.

Yeah, I saw that. You'd think a guy who lives off charity would understand that dropping several hundred dollars on a plane trip and hotel in Croatia for a quickie with a guy who expresses desires to rape and murder all women would be not only unreasonable but financially prohibitive. Especially seeing as you find being merely polite to a woman without a promise of sex in the next hour or less an unreasonable compromise.

old comment by caamib

"And who in any state of mind rejects the self respect that comes from being self-sufficient? "

Modern women.

Like I said, all of my employed friends and almost every member of LS.com are employed. It did nothing at all.

In fact, while women didn't care when I told them I'm not employed I would get hysterical hatred when they heard I was employed. You know why? Because I told them I am financing feminism, aka their own rejection of me as a man who lacks sufficient immorality and stupidity (which men need to be successful with women in feminist societies).

"At the very least it would give you one single leg to stand on when you pontificate about how the economy somehow runs on sex."

Everything runs on the ability to procreate. When you take that ability from intelligent men and give to ghetto idiots with 9 kids Western society turns into Zimbabwe. And we're getting there.

Because even if these men are foolish enough to work they will not procreate and their hearts will eventually stop beating.

Ghetto scum and football players will inherit the world.

old comment by Passerby

"And who in any state of mind rejects the self respect that comes from being self-sufficient? "

Modern women.

The ones you think should give up on working and be completely dependant on men to survive? With no choice but to rely on sex and sexual manipulation to hook a good man like you say working women do?

Try a little harder. I've grown disturbingly fond of seeing you hurt yourself in the attempt to look intelligent.

In fact, while women didn't care when I told them I'm not employed I would get hysterical hatred when they heard I was employed

Okay so you think women somehow actively skim money off of working men... and now claim that women were angry with you for having a job that you imagine they somehow skimmed money off of? You talking to women normally is doubtful enough (you called a girl that believed you were thoughtful a public urinal, remember?) but this is a clincher for pure bullshit.

Everything runs on the ability to procreate

First of all no it does not. That's an attitude clung to by idiots who want a half dozen versions of their worldview who are hopefully a lot less lazy than they are and will change the world where they couldn't be buggered to. What good would procreation do for you, specifically? You can't even look after yourself. You wouldn't even be inclined to look after another person. Do you even want kids? Ignoring for a minute you've decided to randomly add racist horseshit to your ravings if a dirt poor, dismally stupid, actively destructive parasite with no intention of ever contributing to society like you started pumping out kids there'd be nothing to differentiate you from "ghetto trash" but your painful aversion to sunlight. You claimed having a wife and kids would just magically make you inclined to flip everything you've just said on it's head and become a productive member of society, but how exactly does that change anything about the society you claim exploits you other than you think you've gotten what you wanted after holding your breath and waiting for it to fall in your lap you fucking hypocrite? If you knocked a girl up you'd be looking for every excuse in the world to send her packing and continue to be an irresponsible, insufferable, inculpable, insane little ingrate. You're not outraged about anything but not having what you want when you want it.

Think about what the fuck you're saying for five minutes instead of parrotting talking points from MRA's and PUA's (and now apparantly Stormfront, who also have this big issue with women avoiding them) you're just going to turn around on them in under a week. Nobody's oppressing you. You're just a fuckup.

old comment by Passerby

@ Contradictory Asshole Avoiding Morally Introspective Brainstorming

You also wanted chaste prostitutes and a deep, meaningful relationship with a woman without ever having to show her an ounce of respect. You can't string one thought to the next without having to backtrack and essentially try redefine words.

Real irritating considering how you constantly insist none of us know the meaning of CoAlpha when you're here trying to make rape mean a hundred things other than "sex without consent" and telling us what we think.

Well I'm hitting the sack for the night. You've earned your peanuts little dancing monkey, too bad I'm not there to throw them at you.

old comment by caamib

"You also wanted chaste prostitutes "

How insane can you get, really?

"It's just retrograde."

Why? Because it resembles things that are older than modern culture? Is time your only criteria?

"I mean, how, exactly, would an equal society be born out of one gender dominating the other one?"

Where do I state this would happen? I just said that female feminists couldn't stop us from bringing down our current sick feminist system.

"you don't even mention how transgender and genderqueer people fit in this mess of a scheme you thought out"

You don't even know the scheme. Anyway, they should be respected and left to act as whatever gender they feel like.

old comment by Captain Zens

@Caamib

You are not my friend. You refer to me as Captain.

Regardless, what's wrong with a man needing to rely on their personal attractiveness (Which does include their monetary income generally) to attract mates? You know, if you weren't a noble, that's how you got your woman anyways through most of history. Average marrying age of peasants in Medieval Europe was 20-25ish depending on economics (Worse, marry later), and women generally where the people determining the average age in their selection. Depending on country, the woman had more or less control when it came to marriage dates. As long as some noble prick wasn't being well, a prick.

Only in Nobles were women completely controlled, but the men were often too. Arranged Marriages (Which authorities like Peter the Great despised) were common, as a process to help create distribution of land beneficial to both families as well as alliances. Women were controlled because their children would have claims, which could cause wars, so you wouldn't want her going off to bang, say, the Prince of Hungary when you want her married to the impotent Duke of Orleans instead or you want an alliance with Austria.

I won't say they had things as good as they do now. Generally they couldn't own property except in cases of through a proxy, through special laws (Being religious, being in a partnership with another woman, being a widow with no male sons of age), or perhaps never at all. But there were women that supported themselves. Queen Elizabeth had no children. Queen Victoria married because she loved that dude and Queen Maria Theresa (Or Empress, touchy concept there) did the same. But the exaggeration of the value of women being virgins (It should be negative value. More experience should be a positive) did have lots of silly results.

You want the past to be some imagined time when you could claim a woman and provide for her with your yeoman farm. That's not the case. Your woman would work on your yeoman farm with you, probably you took her to help create a bond with a family you and her enjoy. Or you created that Yeoman farm with the help of your wife. If you were a noble? Your wife got dropped on you, whether she's a ugly shrew or shining example of beauty (With a controlling hand that makes you do everything she asks). Or you were a serf or slave, where you had very little control over all of your life unless you're someone like Admiral Zhang. But he was a Eunuch, so we can assume his interest in women was low.

And I'm mostly talking about European civilization, since you seem racist.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Captain Zens

"@caamib

You cannot end cultural principles at the point of a sword or barrel of a gun anymore. Regardless, you a nuttier than a cheese log."

@Mary Jane Lick Sick

"Yes, you can't make everybody change their minds at once."

From that WGW thread:

image

His own words, verbatim. "That's why this culture will collapse" you say, Mary Jane? Yes, you're right.

Your own.

If so-called 'Incel' was a 'culture' in the first place. Because when 'Hentai' is in the Oxford English Dictionary, and the professors, academics, scholars, etymologists, lexicographers et al of the definitive & official collection of what is the English* language, who take their work ultra-seriously, will probably add the now common term 'Selfie' (as smartphones are now ubiquitous) to the next edition of the OED, then I don't fancy 'Incel's chances of so much as reaching the OED's profs, etymologists et al's ears, therefore...!

...and when the exclamation of a character in "Viz" Comic (Finbarr Saunders), 'Fnarr-Fnarr!', is in the OED, 'Incel' - the basis of your 'culture' - never existed in the first place.

Language is the basis of Culture. Nope, not seeing 'Incel' being so much as being heard by the ears of those at the very august OED. Let us know when it does, mm'kay...?!

That is why Zens is Captain. And you're nothing more than Private Parts, cammy. [/mega-zinger] X3

Don't forget, Mary Jane: Sir Isaac Newton died a virgin (84 years he lived; his parents 'didn't kill him', nor did he 'die because he wasn't in a relationship'). Unlike him, who had better things to think about, you're nothing special. Least of all to those of the opposite gender.

Both the source thread on WGW and now here (as per usual), Mary Jane Lick Sick/cammy, with his purely subjective mental handicap-based BS: The prime example of Dunning-Kruger Effect in action.

*- Juggernaut. That's an [i]Indian[/i] word. When the Japanese word 'Hentai' enters the Oxford English Dictionary, then so much for the nonexistent word that is 'Incel'. As made up as 'TAC': and as Tactical Air Command already exists, therefore...! >:D

Meanwhile, like the Juggernaut, Modernist Western culture keeps on a-keepin' on & is in rude health. Bitch. [/X-Men]

old comment by Passerby

I just checked out his blog a few minutes ago and he's actually got some "challenge" up to have people guess what women found the most disgusting about him.

Two people have already guessed that it's going to be the bullshit about having a job. Also in the checklist of very good reasons for women to find him repulsive (you'd almost think he's self-aware) includes a monthlong prison stint and coercing two girls into having sex with him even though he vehemently denied those things just the other day.

@ #1724121

You don't need to impersonate the Sexless Sadsack to make him look any more vile. Just wait patiently and he'll come back to outstrip any insulting statement you could possibly engineer about him while somehow being proud of it. He's talented that way.

old comment by caamib

@ 1723825"Everytime you get called on something you say you either duck the question"

You are a despicable liar. The only post I tend to mostly avoid are those from Passerby and Anon-e- Mouse, two lunatics.

" like when you were asked if you ever proposed to a girl before trying to bed her in keeping with your opinion on pre-marital chastity or it amounts to No, Except Yes."

Of course I didn't, you idiot. For one, there are no chaste girls but Christians around anyway and Christian girls want an idiotic idea of male being chaste as well.

I have fucked some sluts, so what? I took what I could. I wasn't the one who had taken their virginity. Some of those girls have been using their cunts regularly since they were 14.

Passerby - I have not denied being in detention. I just said it wasn't for harrassing some whore.

I have not denied coercing two women into sex. I just said it wasn't rape - and it wasn't. Not by my or any country's laws, not by their opinion. One of them is my best female friend now !

Also,

"Two people have already guessed that it's going to be the bullshit about having a job. "

Why is that bs? It's what happened.

old comment by Passerby

@ #1724121

Told you.

@ 1723825

Thank you for the setup. Don't think I could have done better.

@ Sexless Sadsack

So in denying you duck the question you answer as indirectly as possible by admitting you've never proposed to a girl before not only fucking but coercing two people (AKA blackmailling them, which you've previously denied doing) into sex with you - the literal dictionary definition of rape - but then said it doesn't count becaue you're the man and don't have to live by the rules you set for women. Don't fall back on "they were sluts" because you think goddamned virgins are sluts. You think everybody gunned down by Elliot Rodger was a blonde cheeleader fucking the football team, including the damned men. The aforementioned dictionary. Read it fool. You denied having a criminal record at all. You've had multiple arrests and doing time involves a record no matter what country you're in. (Except in cases of Nolo Contendere, but I'll let you guess why that doesn't apply.) As for why your bullshit about women being angry about you having a job is bullshit I cannot give an answer someone who has never interacted with another human being in a remotely healthy way could understand... but fuck it I don't care if you understand, you're hopeless. When women look for men for a long term relationship they look for stability: Emotional, mental, and yes financial too. Whether they're manipulative psycho-bitches like you think all women are or pure as the falling snow every woman wants their man to make something of themselves. The only women who want kept-men are typically the more-money-than-sense variety looking for eye-candy to strike up faux scandal in high society that I sincerely doubt you've ever come across or the kind that have severe mental issues ranging from compulsive control to Jocasta complexes. You could have gotten away with "not so rich I didn't have to work" to try and imply gull-catching tendencies but you're both a compulsive liar and far too unskilled to craft a convincing narrative.

It is to laugh. And laugh I shall! A beer to the clown! I should take this guy on the road with me, I'd make a killing.

If you read the article above you'll see that unpleasant and disgusting men are adored by women.

Yet here you are in a room full of people who consider you the most hideous slime they've ever come across and yet none of them have asked you out, nor will they unless it's an elaborate ruse to get you alone in a filthy alley where nobody can hear your screams.

(Sorry for spoiling the surprise for anybody that planned to do this, but I cannot approve.)

old comment by Passerby

This is not for the Sexless Sadsack, but for anybody halfway reasonable that honestly believes the "women fall for fuckheads" fallacy.

From my observations women like men who act like assholes for generally one of two reasons: 1) They mistake arrogance for confidence and time spent with egostical men slowly chips down their own self esteem (and men who fancy themselves players in some sick "game" will do this intentionally) until they feel they are nothing without the manipulative egotist or 2) The people who act like jerks show a softer side to them in private that is often entirely an act (which again is part of that "game" strategy) and they believe they can nurture that side to make them a better person or simply feel awed that they are trusted to see this "hidden and vulnerable" side of an otherwise unpleasant person.

That's just my observations though, I've seen a lot in my relatively short life and I haven't got a damned clue what to do with it but if sharing helps somebody then please use it.

Edit:

Conversely and in all fairness: Yes, there are indeed also women who do this with men switching between alpha bitch and flower in a storm as it suits them.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Passerby

To reinforce what you say (certainly re. #1724121), if anything...:

image

...he admits his own depravity. 'Sadsack'? He's Sadsick enough to do what #1724121 suggests. Because of course:

image

In his own subjective & solipsistic 'moral' dimension, that makes it all right.

And still being the contrarian little squit he is. Like I say, he's Humpty Dumpty straight out of "Alice Through the Looking Glass"; and it's not just words that he can redefine at will: it's morality:

image

The prosecution rests, m'lud.

As for Mary Jane Lick Sick, Croatia's own - and admitted - Jimmy Sa[i]vile[/i]:

@GG Anus, a.k.a. cammy, a.k.a. Mary Jane Lick Sick: "Does this mean I will kill TAC members myself? No, because I fear legal retribution in doing so".

Chickenshit much, cammy? You fear MODERNIST legal retribution. But isn't the 'Modernist' system supposed to be 'collapsing', thus your "GOR"-esque world rising to take it's place, with we 'Feminazis' being conquered by all your heroic 'Co-Alphas' with you as their Fuhrer to remake the world in YOUR image?

But only in YOUR so-called 'imagination', though. Modernism is in rude health, and you're still the chickenshit lazy cunt mentally handicapped sperglord affected with Dunning-Kruger.

Modernism - 7,000,000,000+. You - 0. Elliot Todger failed. Hitler failed. Where do you think you can succeed where they haven't...? You never will.

@SpukiKitty

"@Passerby

I've decided to call him "Sexless Coconutsack". Waddaya think?"

image

b^_^d

@Passerby

More along the lines of, say... Buster Gonad in "Viz" Comic, if anything. And Buster usually suffers unimaginable ballhurt, so...! >:D

The ultimate in Blue Balls Syndrome for Mary Jane Lick Sick. X3

old comment by Passerby

@ Anon-e-Moose, SpukiKitty

Very well, the case has been made and the new shame christened.

Sick Licks The Sexless Coconutsack

Hey, whaddaya know? You just managed to reason with a liberal to change his opinion on something.

@ Sexless Coconutsack

Care for some salt to go with your words? Or shall I just dump it in your wounds?

Edit:

Wait a second. Did women express their disgust at finding out you had a job - likely one that was minimum wage and/or menial in nature - after telling an insane series of lies about your personal successes? That makes it almost halfway believable, seeing as you're so warped you think the fact you lied to them from beginning to end with your job being the inescapable tip of the iceberg would have no bearing on their reaction or could somehow make you hotter in their eyes. Man I really got to start adding in that circuitous clusterfuck filter more often. It would really help me understand the bullshit you keep trying to convince people of so much better and enable more hardcore deconstruction.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Coconutsack

The surest measure of a man's better qualities lies not in his own boasting but in what his enemies say of him. There is a notable void in redeeming qualities on that front.

Your screencaps include mention (by you and not the supposed troll) that you made a habit of lying to your dates about being wildly successful. So yes, you did just deny the screencaps. And the offhand way you said that the better your job was the more it turned women off also implies that you went through jobs as quickly as you did through rejections.

Claiming women hate men they benefit from isn't logical, certainly not when you also claim women are manipulators who want nothing to do with men they cannot benefit from. You're further from anything resembling a rational thought than I am from being President of the United States. Which is difficult as I am Canadian.

@ Anon-e-Moose

Betting on a certainty has no payout, though I suppose I might have taken odds on whether it would be his first resort.

old comment by caamib

I never said I denied lying about this at times. You're the one that fabricated that I told them I have a minimum-wage job after these lies. But I never told them that. I'd tell them I had an extremely well paying job and that's when the hatred was the greatest. Also, where do you get the idea I changed jobs fast? Not from that statement, nope.

Women hate men they benefit but are not attracted to the same way masters hate their slaves.

"claim women are manipulators who want nothing to do with men they cannot benefit from"

These women don't benefit from men's money. They have the state for that. They benefit from their immorality and stupidity, as this ensures their sons will be successful with mating as well.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Coconutsack

Thing about backpedalling: No matter how hard you try you're still stuck in the spot you're trying to get away from but now you're losing momentum fast.

Women have the state to sponge off so they don't need men who work and thus hate them but also men who work feed the state the women sponge off so they need them and hate them. Immoral men who aren't self-absorbed rapists and insist on doing crazy things like working for a living to provide for their wife and kids cannot get women and will not procreate while moral men who don't bother with consent and are considered hideous shitbags which women find irresistable go through life alone. But women are attracted to shitbags and throw themselves at them to have a million shitbag babies that the shitbag will have to get a job to support and then she'll hate him because he has a job.

Following this? No? That's because it is a flowchart of the shit you've been spewing thus far and it is insane.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

http://www.whygodwhy.org/t3962p50-coalphaantimodernistincelblogger

image

@cammy

"All of humanity anywhere ever in history knew that female rapists were as existent as unicorns because rape can only be performed with a penis and enough force for a victim to fear for her/his* life"

Your words, verbatim.

image

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3691278/Robber-fed-Viagra-and-kept-bras-sex-slave-by-salon-owner.html

[i]Karate[/i] expert keeps shop burglar as sex slave for three days

Thank you, for proving the existence of Twilight Sparkle, who is best pony, natch. [/hyper-sarcasm]

image

...and that a woman can rape a man; and not only via the above method/reason, neither. One word: Strapons. [/'Going in Dry'] >:D

...oh, and 'rape can only be performed with a penis and enough force for a victim to fear for her/his life'? Thanks for admitting that - as the above proves - it IS possible, thus destroying your own argument. Self-contrarian, much?!

That's why you're not an Argument Annihilator, and I am. Well, you are: but only against yourself.

*- In b4 'I was talking about male-male rape'. Yes. And the above proves otherwise, too. And as women can rape too (and not just female-female), then there's your entire 'argument' - i.e. your raison d'etre & basis of your mindset - obliterated.

If women can't have sex, neither can the likes of you, Mary Jane. And like them as per your own insane 'logic' - you equally don't have the RIGHT to sex, neither ('Needs'? Sir Isaac Newton - who died a virgin - destroys that 'argument' of yours). If men can 'rape', then women can do the same - to YOU.

Two words: Lorena Bobbit.

A pack of wolves, and their hierarchy, has at it's top an Alpha Pair: Male & Female.

Despite human intervention, wolves still exist. Their culture exists. The Alpha Female.

Female Alpha wolves are just as strong, and fight just as savagely as the male. 'Know their differences', you say? The only difference between males & females: Chromosomes. Just ask the women in the IDF. Two words: Krav Maga.

You'd know the difference, should you dare spew your BS - 'Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength' - to the faces of one of them. Soon after you were on the floor, in a pool of your own blood, and she was standing above you, with the expression on her face that speaks 'Superiority'. Alpha female, like one half of the top of a wolf pack's hierarchy.

That's why Feminism & Modernism exist. And there's not one fucking thing you can do about it: more-than literally too.

Like wolves, Feminism & Modernism still exist. By definition, the likes of you will never breed, thus you will become extinct, therefore so-called 'Incel' and 'Co-alpha' as a 'culture' never existed to start with.

@Passerby

And you know ol' Sadsick will sperg away as per usual, trying to justify himself as per usual.

image

If he changed, he'd have to kill himself. Too lazy to get a job, too lazy to admit he's worong in word, action & thought.

Must be cold in that river in Egypt, Mary Jane. Wet, too. And what fabulous hue is the sky in your little one-man dimension, cammy? Ground Control to Major Dumb. Houston, you have a problem

..yet, I - who have a job, and am in a relationship, with regular sex - don't. Curious how things work out here on Planet Reality eh Sadsick? The only thing i don't have is a criminal record. Now who's 'moral'? Who's 'insane'...?!

old comment by Passerby

I was going to wait for Anon-e-Moose to clinch this but it's got to be said:

You continuously denied the very existence of criminal records for anyone in Croatia, and in trying to denounce an application for Certificate of Clearance/Conduct/Impunity which has a record of all criminal convictions in the same way a Birther dismisses a certificate of live birth as not being a birth certificate by first claiming it was for ongoing proceedings but when the egg hit your face you smugly "correct" it with a phrase that literally translates to Certificate of Criminal Record which - again - you claim isn't even a thing. Moreover even if this particular document is not specifically your criminal record if there were no such thing as a criminal record your convictions would not be recorded in the first place. The only difference between Croatia's criminal records and those of Canada's is that Croatian criminal records are not available to the general public i.e. employer background checks and are very guarded even when being used by law enforcement. You can access your own record though. Go on, do it. It'll be a barrel of laughs.

And since you brought it up yourself this time you never did explain just how prostitutes become exempt from a standing law that says women cannot have sex until married. Dictatorial assignment or socially suicidal volunteering against all ingrained CoAlpha values?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Passerby

See? Mary Jane 'Contrarian Squit' Lick Sick is now trying to deny reality. Croatia must either have the most lax laws in the world, bordering on outright anarchy, Or he's using his (to him) cunningly crafted & contrived web of excuses; not getting a job (because he's actually a lazy cunt), his cult-like 'Hypnotic Suggestion'-esque state of denial; he's 'moral', 'sane' etc - but only according to his twisted set of values, that can be summed up in a word: Sociopathic.

A state of delusion that he thinks that the world will, nay, must bend to his will, or else it's everyone else who's at fault: except him. Solipsism.

Q: How many Sadsicks does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: One. Mary Jane just stands there while he waits for the rest of the world to revolve around him.

And that's what he is: a Mega-Emo Hyper-Narcissist Attention Whore with Sociopathic Entitlement Issues.

He's basically the kid in the supermarket, impotently screaming, punching & kicking away at the floor, because he can't have the bar of chocolate, whilst others pass by, either ignoring the inferior little subhuman squit, or merely pointing & laughing at his inferiority because the rest of the world won't do as he says. Rather like... this:

image

The difference between the above, which represents Sadsick, and the rest of us who are the other shoppers pointing & laughing at him is simple.

We've grown up.

And all because he's too mentally handicapped to realise that he's wrong, and everyone else is right. Sadsick: Dunning-Kruger Effect in action.

'Lunatic', eh? By WHOSE definition...? Not seeing those degrees in psychology after your name boy, therefore you're less than qualified - certainly no right to think - to define others' behavioural states. (and we've had an FSTDTer who knows someone studying psychology - showing him Mary Jane's BS - who concluded he's insane, and we're not. By virtue of the simple fact that we don't so much as think the way he does)

...and after so many times of pointing out my superiority to him in every conceivable way (having a job, being in a relationship with regular sex etc), I've still to hear his laser-sharp, argument-annihilating & converting to his way of thinking explanation as to why I - by his 'definition' - am 'Insane'.

Now, o good Passerby: hearing his explanation - without resorting to his subjective (certainly Sociopathy-based) 'opinion' - should be good. If he doesn't, and to my satisfaction, i.e. 'converting' me to his (so-called) way of 'thinking' via his scalpel-sharp intellect, with an indestructible argument guaranteed to make anyone who hears such 'see the light' and join his currently one-man anti-modernism 'cause', or merely hand-wave me away as a 'Lunatic' (as per usual), then he'll have conceded the entire point - i.e. his justifications & mindset; 'Co-Alpha' & all that BS - lost the argument, and thus proved that he - as per that macro with Kevin Spacey's Lex Luthor - is WRONG!.

(*Cracks knuckles & intellect*)

image

(Passerby, the Captcha code on TinyPic to upload this pic was 'Well Read'. The omens are good already! /)^3^(\ )

(*Settles back with beer & popcorn, to watch the resulting sociopathic subjective solipsism-based 'Spergsplosion' by Sadsick: either way, we're guaranteed to win*)

...or he can simply fuck off out of FSTDT and never return. It's the only possible way he can emerge from this with any semblance of so-called 'Pride' intact.

...and he'll have still conceded the point, thus proving we're superior to him regardless (and he's similarly fucked off out of previous FSTDT discussion threads, so it's not as if he hasn't before). As we always will be superior to inferior subhumans like him. You'd have thought that Troll4Life would've gotten the similar hint by now. She must be just as spergy, mentally handicapped & Dunning-Kruger affected as Sadsick is.

old comment by Svata

Oi! Shitlicker/Caamib/whatever the fuck you're calling yourself.

All the evidence points to one fact. You, my impotent, whiny little man, are an asshole. No, let me rephrase, you are a worthless, less-than-useless, detrimental force that makes the world a worse place merely by continuing to exist. You are a ruptured appendix. Go die in a hole, alone and unloved. You deserve nothing less for your abhorrent views on what life should be, and your attempts to make other people think likewise. People like you cause tragedies like the Elliot Roger shooting. You condone such acts, and want them to be perpetrated. You are the antithesis of what being a good human being is about.

old comment by Skyknight

I'm thinking we're going to have a hard time getting through to Caamib. Note this quote of his (unfortunately, Encyclopaedia Dramatica was not nice enough to supply a link):

I was fucked from day one. I was bullied as a child, hung out with dorky people all of whom were male, was extremely love-shy as a teenager, which made me miss some crucial chances (namely, it made me to frightened to meet a girl I talked to online or via sms irl until I was 18, which is a disaster that has fucked me up for life), prone to depression, withdrawn and smarter than almost all other kids. (Emphasis mine)

I'm getting from context and diction that he viewed himself that way even then (absent the shyness towards romance, anyway; as in, I get the feeling he means even when he was pre-pubescent). And it doesn't sound like he was considering ways to help the other kids increase their intellect. Long story short, I get the feeling he's had a sense of scorn towards the Other for a LONG time. Possibly lifelong. (Should be interesting to see which philosophers his parents followed.)

old comment by

caamib plays the Victim card in attack mode. Victim is destroyed by caamibs' opponents in sequence but returns to his hand after every round through the Persistent Delusion field effect. Passerby plays Legalese in attack mode and lays one card face down. caamib plays the magic card Obfuscating Smoke activating Passerby's trap card Ya Dun Goofed neutralizing all active effects before countering with Legalese. caamib sustains direct damage! Roll die to save from secondary effects. Critical fumble forces caamib to end his turn with an empty hand. Anon-e-moose plays two cards at once! Anon-e-moose attacks with Shredding Ego for direct damage and finishes his turn with a heavily buffed Come at me, Bro! in defense mode activating its special ability.

Without possessing Mature Deflection, Wise Departure, or Reversal of Wit caamib has no chance to negate the special ability of Come at me, Bro! and will have to meet it head on in the next turn or forfeit the match.

Can caamib survive another round with his limited and overused cards? Will he gamble it all on his next draw with only Victim, Scapegoat, Bluster, and Self-Destruct as his standby options for attack and defense? Will he continue to accuse his opponents of stacking the deck against him? Find out next time, in the thrilling conclusion of In-Cel-Emo!

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Captain Zens

(*Salutes*)

Well sir, it appears that his supposedly 'indestructible' argument for his 'way of thinking' that would instantly 'convert' anyone to his 'cause' is as invincible as a Mysteron retrometabolised double thrown into a high voltage grid by Spectrum agent Captain Scarlet

@#1724952

image

Elesa uses Emolga and Zebstrika on Sadfuck. It's Super Effective!

Sadfuck faints under his 'indestructible' logic fried by high voltage and fucks off.

@Anon

Sadsick bangs on & on about supposedly 'superior' Eastern (European) culture. Well that hairdresser who taught that robber a lesson is also a Karate expert: Far Eastern culture. And possesses the Western Feminist attitude to render herself superior to the Sadsick-esque inferior subhuman man who thought he had the right to have ideas above his 'gender' - when he doesn't.

Moral: If that Russian woman is anything to go by - and I trust she's not the only one - then Modernism is not only in rude health, it's becoming stronger.

Good. And that's why Sadfuck's fucked off. You've still conceded the point, and proved we on FSTDT right, regardless. >:D

...and that good peeps is another Argument Annihilation technique that you can utilise too: Cornering someone into an argumental Claymore Mine Array of their own making.

@Skyknight, Svata

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97923&Page=3#1611193

@Neith

"In addition to what everyone else has said, I will add that you want to fuck helpless little 12-year-old girls, and you don't think there should be any age of consent for boys. Wanting to fuck a 12-year-old makes you a pedophile."

I refer Passerby to... Passerby, on that same page, prior to Neith's comment:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97923&Page=3#1610903

@Governmentsggfs
'And why I'm I not a good person?'

Proof that he's in such a state of denial, he's living in a rusted old U-Boat in a certain river in Egypt. Sadsicksville; population: him. Like I say, Sadsick = Humpty Dumpty in "Alice Through The Looking Glass": only more so.

Meanwhile...:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97478&Page=3#1602420

Keep pointing & laughing at Sadfuck. Or in his case, Sadnotfuck. >:D

I'm getting some, Mary Jane. And you're not. LOL!

(From ED article):

'penile insensitivity due to years of chronic wanking'

image

Time to point & laugh, FSTDT!

...and time to add this to the list of past threads where Mary Jane Lick Sick has fucked off:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97304&Page=2

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97476&Page=2

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97478&Page=3

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=97923&Page=3

http://www.whygodwhy.org/t3806p575-love-shy

And still conceded the point(s), regardless.

http://www.whygodwhy.org/t3962p725-coalphaantimodernistincelblogger

@cammy

"Anyway, told you many times. I'll leave when you assholes stop talking about me."

I refer you to the above FSTDT/WGW links. And you've left previous WGW threads as well. Contrarian little squit, much? Like I say: you're nothing more than a Mega-Emo Attention Whore & Hyper-Narcissist with Sociopathic Entitlement Issues.

You're still talked about. So many touched nerves, so little time to sperg, eh Sadsick...?

@Sad[I]sick

Your so-called 'blog' (which is your 'life', otherwise you'd concentrate solely on these FSTDT/WGW threads) is merely an echo-chamber, 'preaching to the converted'. Andy Schaftafly's Conservapedia has been reviled by conservative commentators, journalists, bloggers et al, and he's regarded as a pariah by mainstream Republicans & a heretic by fundamentalist Christianity in the US (his 'Bible Project). Conservapoodia is nothing more than a wanking sock in HTML form. A 'Vanity Project' that's damaging the image of fundamentalist Christianity, if anything. An echo-chamber.

Even Hitler - by killing himself - admitted he & his way of 'thinking' was wrong. Western (& 'Eastern') culture triumphed. Still here, and becoming stronger (Germany, post-WWII; the EU; Angela Merkel. That Russian Karate expert who taught that subhuman 'man' a lesson. Feminism. Modernism).

But you keep convincing yourself that you're 'right', and everyone else is wrong; you're 'sane', and everyone else isn't. The West. You. You do the maths.

http://www.whygodwhy.org/t3962p850-coalphaantimodernistincelblogger

Sayeth the one who'll never marry, thus he'll never experience 'Women's Suffrage', i.e. divorce settlements, therefore that issue is as relevant to him as Chris Boardman's Lotus carbon fibre bike is to a mackerel. [/Surreal]

Lel!

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"Anyway, told you many times. I'll leave when you assholes stop talking about me."

We're still talking about you, Sadsick. Oh yes, that's right: if you did return, you'd have to rebut my previous point: your scalpel-sharp, invincible & impossible to argue 'logic' against 'Modernism' & 'Feminism' (but only to my satisfaction) that would make me experience a Damascene 'epiphany', realise 'Why have I been so 'Modernist' & 'Feminist' all this time?! Mary Jane is absolutely right! I shall follow him as my Fuhrer as a fellow 'Co-Alpha' unto death!'

...but remember: handwaving me away as a 'Lunatic' as per usual, you'll have conceded the point. As you'll have equally conceded the point by not appearing ITT again to argue the point adequately (again, to my satisfaction, that makes me 'see the light').

Quite the contrarian multi-dimensional paradox for Sadsick, resembling the argumental equivalent of an MC Escher artwork.

And we've still won, regardless.

Ah, whither Sir DixonDongs in that thread (as per a previous one in WGW, infected by Sadsick): he's the funniest poster on that forum.

@Anon

And thus is his ultimate hypocrisy. 'Western Culture' & 'Modernism' are anathema to Sadsick. Yet, he uses this as another excuse for him to say that 'Modernism is evil', yet Modern technlogy' is fine. Fact: LGBT people by & large support Feminism, by definition.

The inventor of the Digital Computer, and developer of what we use today, Alan Turing: Gay.

Ergo, 'Modern Technology' is interconnected with Modernism. Certainly the spread of such, culturally. BBSs. Forums. Mypage. Bebo. Facebook. Twitter.

Alan Turing: UK. Western Culture.

What Sadsick uses to spew his BS: the WWW.

HTML. Invented by Sir Tim Berners-Lee: UK. Western Culture.

Not seeing Mr. Berners-Lee subscribing to Sadsick's 'way of thinking'.

'Western Culture' being evil, thus by definition 'Eastern Culture' being superior (Fact: Sadsick has even said that Hitler would've been better for the West. Yeah. Mary Jane's a Hitler-lover, to compound his FAIL). 'Western Culture is evil'. Another excuse by Sadsick to justify the unjustifiable.

His whole life is just one big - but extremely pathetic - excuse. I refer you to that .GIF of the spoilt brat in the supermarket, which represents Sadsick. He can no longer justify his 'Entitlement' issues. The rest of us have grown up.

image

Oh, so you were abused in your youth, Sadsick? Boo hoo. You'd never be SAS material. Sir Ranulph Fiennes, adventurer & explorer. He cut off his OWN fingers when they nearly turned gangrenous due to frostbite. He was thrown out of the SAS for being too rough. PROTIP: The US Navy SEALs respect the SAS. It's rumoured that there are a few gay men in our SAS. Can you say 'Spetsnaz', Mary Jane' I know you can. Those women in the IDF. Krav Maga. [/The Russian woman 'teaching that robber a lesson']

You no longer have the right to resort to ANY excuses now, Mary Jane Lick Sick. EVER.

old comment by Passerby

@ Sexless Coconutsack

I told you what the only difference was: public access. Do I really have to explain the difference between a third party criminal background check and the criminal records kept by every country that has a functioning legal system? Why do you think Croatia HAS a Deparment of Criminal Records if they supposedly don't exist? Read it for yourself. Paragraphs 4 and 5. Sorry, but as we've been trying to tell you since day one you're nowhere near as smart as you think you are. If you were half as knowledgable about the psychology of women or even a quarter as clever as you try to claim you wouldn't have a long-running blog detailing what a massive fuckup you are and how you blame everyone else for that. You lost the right to even argue the point a long time ago but we've made it somewhat official.

You lost the game, son, and you lost because you never bothered to learn the rules.

Edit:

"Immoral men who aren't self-absorbed rapists and insist on doing crazy things like working for a living to provide for their wife and kids cannot get women ..." (caamib cannot read further from laughing)

Whaaat? Are you off your meds again, dear?

So you agree that this line of reasoning is insane? Because it's yours.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Passerby

And see how he handwaves me away with his use of 'Lunatic'? Can I call it, or what?! The more he refuses to counter what I - and the rest of FSTDT - say, with said invincible argument for his 'way of thinking', he himself continues to concede the point, and also prove Modernism and Feminism right.

Nope, still not seeing his invincible reasoning as to why I'm a 'Lunatic' and/or 'Insane', nor his utterly indestructible argument for why I should drop my Feminism/Modernism, realise I was 'wrong' all along, and follow his 'cause' of 'Co-Alpha'-ism

...oh, and the inventor of the Digital Computer - Turing - was gay, and therefore Feminist and Modernist.

@rikalous

Indeed. Sad[i]sick[/i] here has a [i]woman[/i] to thank: Ada Lovelace.

'In fact [/snerk!], modern technology was brought about by men (and a Gay, thus Feminist man: Alan Turing) modern women find to be boring geeks (I refer you to Ada Lovelace) and modernism as a way of thinking is extremely anti-intellectual', you say?

image

Oh no more, please Mr. Wilde, I am bereft of ribs! Houston, we have sides liftoff.

Florence Nightingale. Your argument is [i]invalid[/i]. [/Statistics]

'In fact, modern technology was brought about by men modern women find to be boring geeks and modernism as a way of thinking is extremely anti-intellectual'. 'Modern' women. Ada Lovelace, Florence Nightingale & all their ilk. Funny then, that Queen Victoria didn't do anything to stifle the likes of Ms. Nightingale; the Industrial Revolution, the 'New Renaissance' and all that jazz. And her husband Prince Albert was very much the 'tech geek' of his time.

'modern women find to be boring geeks and modernism as a way of thinking is extremely anti-intellectual' he says, eh FSTDTers? The more I read this latest piece of BS by Sadsick, it makes me laugh. Especially with this thought: Mere 'woman' Hedy Lamarr. Without her, we wouldn't have Wi-Fi and Bluetooth today. ('This early version of frequency hopping, although novel, soon was met with opposition from the U.S. Navy and was not adopted') Quite the gap between her innovation then, and home computers in the 1980s to recent years; no man came up with such an invention during that time to prove her wrong, and thus you right, eh?

'modern women find to be boring geeks and modernism as a way of thinking is extremely anti-intellectual'. Thank you, Mary Jane Lick Sick. Thank you for walking into a Claymore mine array of your [i]own[/i] making. [/Inconvenient Facts]

And not just in the most obvious way, neither (the point: 'modern women'):

"modern women find to be boring geeks and modernism as a way of thinking is extremely anti-intellectual"

image

So is improper use of grammar by a man.

The not so 'modern' [i]man[/i] Samuel Johnson ([i]1709[/i]-1784) would like a word with you. About [i]your[/i] anti-[i]intellectualism[/i].

'modern women I find to be boring geeks', I think you'll find is the actual wording. 'F', see me after class.

Whatever was left from his auto-annihilation by the previous argumental Claymore mine array, and placed there by himself no less, has flown up and triggered off an even larger Claymore mine array to reduce such to nothing.

Ah, the exponentially increasing FAIL of the intellectually inferior Mary Jane Lick Sick, it knows no bounds. Nope, not seeing Feminism & 'Modernism' collapsing, little boy (*Pats Sadsick on head*), so you go back to your cardboard box 'He-Man Woman Hater's Club' fort dear, the adults are talking.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

Still conceding the point, Mary Jane Lick Sick. Still not seeing that 'Invincible Argument' of yours that'll make me instantly drop my Feminist mindset, realise that YOU'VE been right all along, drop whatever I'm doing and follow you as my Fuhrer of 'Coalfart-ism'.

...or in that river in Egypt over one simple fact: you don't have an 'Invincible Argument' as to why you're 'right' and the rest of Planet Reality is wrong. All you have merely impotent 'Ventings' on a nondescript 'blog'. Thus you still concede the point. And always will, as long as your 'GOR'-esque fantasy remains exactly that: a fantasy.

Your one-man 'cause': accelerating the 'collapse' of Modernism. Yeah. It's working, isn't it? And still chimping out whenever anyone dares to call you out on your BS and laugh at the micropenis of your 'Manifesto' that is your thought-wanking in HTML form on said 'blog'; nope, that's not the behaviour of a self-confessed 'Intelligent', 'Moral' and 'sane' person, nosiree. [/hyper-sarcasm]

...now watch as he handwaves me away again, via use of 'Lunatic' & 'Insane', without that 'Invincible Argument' that'll make anyone who reads such 'convert' immediately. And he'll still concede the point, regardless. [/hyper-paradox]

Moral: Constantly Googling your screename(s) to see if anyone is laughing at your micropenis of a 'philosophy' on an irrelevance of a 'blog', then going to said forum/board & chimping out at those who do. Sad.

...still, if you want to prove us wrong - and how you are 'Intelligent', 'Moral' and how 'Sane' you are, compared to the rest of us - then you know the only possible way you can: Not appear here in FSTDT - or anywhere else, for that matter - in perpetuity, no matter theform(s) of ridicule-based provocation.

You'll prove how sad & wrong you are - chimping out at said ridicule of your psychological metaphorical 'micropenis' - if you do. [/Mega-paradox]

(From linked WGW thread; page 33):

caamib wrote: 'it takes a lot of balls to write a blog I'm writing'

@Biped

"Yeah, blogging is serious business!"

And every single post by cammy in that WGW thread - as per previous ones in his screename du jour guises - proves he's a sad, pathetic little chimpout artist in desperate need of psychological treatment.

The prosecution rests.

Go ahead and prove us wrong, Mary Jane. If you can.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Pharaoh Bastethotep

Mary Jane Lick Sick makes it so blatantly obvious, even Stevie Wonder can see it's him.

"In some countries one can be convicted with the conviction immediately deleted from the record."

Which ones? I doubt that even Croatia is one of those that do. Perhaps third-world shitholes, with the rampant corruption and all.

Detention is still a conviction: it'll still be on your criminal record, idiot.

Strange that I don't have a criminal record for so much as spitting on the pavement. I've never resorted to banging a drum whilst being naked in public. I've never done what cammy-poo has:

https://lolcow.wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Marjan_%C5%A0ikli%C4%87&%2Fwiki%2FUser%3ACephalometrist%2FHolden_Draft=#Marjan_and_the_Law

'he posted his revenge fantasies/revenge plans on the original love-shy forums. An administrator informed Interpol and about two weeks later, Marjan was arrested by the Croatian police. He spent one month in jail for this.'

And why would I commit - in the eyes of the court - the serious crime of Contempt by begging the judge for sex? That's the last thing you should think of doing; 'desperate' or not.

But then, as I have a job I like doing, and I'm in a relationship with a magnificent woman whom I have the utmost respect for; we have consenting sex at least twice a week. She's in a job and makes more than I do; and more power to her, says I, at least I'm not a lazy workshy welfare case - via the largesse of a government presided by a woman in Croatia - who is such the saddo retard with no life that he can only spew his BS & impotent whinings to anyone he thinks will listen on the internet; but no longer on Reddit, as he was permabanned from there.

Your 'Sacreds' get welfare too, dont forget, Mary Jane. So you're exactly like them. Don't forget: 'Privilege' (http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=118912)

Are you entitled to that money, cammy-poo...?! [/hyper-paradox]

caamib #sexist whygodwhy.org

118 comments

Confused?